Closed
Bug 561988
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Can't install Jetpacks from a website
Categories
(Toolkit :: Add-ons Manager, defect)
Toolkit
Add-ons Manager
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: whimboo, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [rewrite])
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.3a5pre) Gecko/20100426 Minefield/3.7a5pre There is currently no way to install a jetpack from a website without having the jetpack engine installed separately. There is no notification bar shown when you open a page which contains a jetpack. Steps: 1. Create a fresh profile 2. Open http://ehsanakhgari.org/blog/2010-01-12/bugzilla-made-even-more-awesome A notification bar should be shown to let you install the jetpack.
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
It is not expected that you should be able to install jetpacks based on the old jetpack prototype in the new add-ons manager without the jetpack prototype installed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
That means with an updated jetpack (an example I will get from you) it already works? In that case it would be nice to get at least 2-3 differnet ones so we can run tests by installing multiple ones until an official page with jetpacks is available.
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2) > That means with an updated jetpack (an example I will get from you) it already > works? In that case it would be nice to get at least 2-3 differnet ones so we > can run tests by installing multiple ones until an official page with jetpacks > is available. The final specification for how they work only got decided a short time ago but yes I'm trying to get some made up. Since they aren't in the wild though I suspect it's not critical that we test much of these before the trunk landing.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > The final specification for how they work only got decided a short time ago but > yes I'm trying to get some made up. Since they aren't in the wild though I > suspect it's not critical that we test much of these before the trunk landing. If we detect a bug which requires a change of the specification, would that involve a schema change of the extension.sqlite? Or is that file immune to such a change?
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > The final specification for how they work only got decided a short time ago but > > yes I'm trying to get some made up. Since they aren't in the wild though I > > suspect it's not critical that we test much of these before the trunk landing. > > If we detect a bug which requires a change of the specification, would that > involve a schema change of the extension.sqlite? Or is that file immune to such > a change? It is unlikely. But schema changes to extensions.sqlite aren't necessarily a problem once on trunk, we can write code to easily migrate between the schemas, I just haven't been doing that on the development branch because it is additional work and testing which seems mostly wasted when it is only a tiny group of people currently using the branch.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•