Closed
Bug 599748
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
Remove custom |def check_call()|, now that Python 2.4 is unsupported
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: General, defect)
Firefox Build System
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla6
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
3.91 KB,
patch
|
ted
:
review+
benjamin
:
approval2.0-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
{
/testing/mozmill/mozrunner-2.5.1/mozrunner/killableprocess.py
* line 86 -- def check_call(*args, **kwargs):
}
Jeff, I'm not sure about this one.
{
/build/util.py
* line 44 -- def check_call(*popenargs, **kwargs):
}
Ted, do you want to keep an empty/placeholder util.py?
Flags: in-testsuite-
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
for mozrunner, it is a straight inclusion of the pypi version of mozrunner: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mozrunner . As far as I know, mozrunner is still scheduled to support 2.4, so I see no reason to remove it from m-c. By the same token, I see no reason not to remove it either. ctalbert?
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0)
> Ted, do you want to keep an empty/placeholder util.py?
No, you can just hg rm that file and fix the files that import it.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mozrunner
Thanks for your answer.
Wrt this bug, this occurrence should be fixed, when times come, in upstream repository.
Assignee: nobody → sgautherie.bz
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #478915 -
Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek)
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #478915 -
Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 478915 [details] [diff] [review]
(Av1) Remove 'util.py'
[Checked in: Comment 12]
"approval2.0=?":
Trivial build utils cleanup, zero risk.
Attachment #478915 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 478915 [details] [diff] [review]
(Av1) Remove 'util.py'
[Checked in: Comment 12]
Per bug 601207,
I'll push upload.py only;
client.py (+ util.py) needs to support v2.4 still.
Ted, please read discussion there in case you would want to file a bug to have client.py called from a more recent version in MXR case...
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> Comment on attachment 478915 [details] [diff] [review]
> (Av1) Remove 'util.py'
>
> Per bug 601207,
> I'll push upload.py only;
> client.py (+ util.py) needs to support v2.4 still.
>
> Ted, please read discussion there in case you would want to file a bug to have
> client.py called from a more recent version in MXR case...
m-c client.py is not used for mxr nor for any buildbots, the c-c client.py is however, so this should still be good-to-go.
CC:ing justdave just incase my presumption about mxr is incorrect, though I would be shocked if so.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 478915 [details] [diff] [review]
(Av1) Remove 'util.py'
[Checked in: Comment 12]
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ec1525343e0b
Attachment #478915 -
Attachment description: (Av1) Remove 'util.py' → (Av1) Remove 'util.py'
[Checked in: Comment 8]
Attachment #478915 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
No longer depends on: 601207
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla2.0b8
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
I backed out all the changesets in your push because they weren't approved.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 478915 [details] [diff] [review]
(Av1) Remove 'util.py'
[Checked in: Comment 12]
(In reply to comment #9)
> I backed out all the changesets in your push because they weren't approved.
See discussion in bug 595756 :-<
Attachment #478915 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #478915 -
Attachment description: (Av1) Remove 'util.py'
[Checked in: Comment 8] → (Av1) Remove 'util.py'
[Checked in: Comment 8]
Attachment #478915 -
Flags: approval2.0? → approval2.0-
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #478915 -
Attachment description: (Av1) Remove 'util.py'
[Checked in: Comment 8] → (Av1) Remove 'util.py'
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9)
> I backed out all the changesets in your push because they weren't approved.
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/60ce967b4a96
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 478915 [details] [diff] [review]
(Av1) Remove 'util.py'
[Checked in: Comment 12]
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/2d69f47f25e5
Attachment #478915 -
Attachment description: (Av1) Remove 'util.py' → (Av1) Remove 'util.py'
[Checked in: Comment 12]
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•14 years ago
|
||
Ah, I just remembered bug 601207 :-/
Dave, could you check/confirm what the current MXR status is w.r.t. python version and this check-in?
Updated•7 years ago
|
Product: Core → Firefox Build System
Comment 14•3 years ago
|
||
The bug assignee didn't login in Bugzilla in the last 7 months.
:mhentges, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Assignee: bugzillamozillaorg_serge_20140323 → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Flags: needinfo?(mhentges)
Comment 15•3 years ago
|
||
There's no longer a mozrunner
-related check_call()
function defined.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago → 3 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(mhentges)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•