605329 - UI review and revamp

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(addons.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Add-on Builder, defect, P3)

Description

[Daniel Buchner [:dbuc]]

Chowse has agreed to do a usability and UX review that will have development impacts for the 1.0a6 release and beyond. Any extremely urgent UX issues found will be addressed in 1.0a6.

Comment 1

[Wil Clouser [:clouserw]]

I think this happened.  Is there more to do here?

Comment 2

[Chris Howse [:chowse]]

(In reply to comment #1)
> I think this happened.  Is there more to do here?

We had a chance to briefly review the Builder UX, but I didn't have the time to prepare any deliverables (wires, comps) before the end of quarter. We decided to defer this until after 1.0a6, when we could explore some more substantive changes and get the necessary deliverables to engineering earlier.

Comment 3

[Wil Clouser [:clouserw]]

Looks like it's in .7: https://wiki.mozilla.org/AMO/FlightDeck/1.0a7

Comment 4

[Daniel Buchner [:dbuc]]

We will need this review performed at Chowse's earliest convenience after the 1.0a6 push to live on November 22.

Comment 5

[Dietrich Ayala (:dietrich)]

I compiled a list of Flightdeck UX issues here:

http://etherpad.mozilla.com:9000/flightdeck-ux

Comment 6

[Daniel Buchner [:dbuc]]

I updated the things we've covered, nearly all the rest will be covered within this quarter

Comment 7

[Wes Kocher (:KWierso) (Not reading bugmail; email directly if needed)]

What's the status of things in this bug? I'm going through the SDK and Builder components in Bugzilla, clearing out old ones that haven't been touched in a while.

Could any remaining issues from that etherpad be filed as separate bugs so this one can be closed?

Comment 8

[Daniel Buchner [:dbuc]]

There are still two or three things left on Dietrich's list that I'd like to get to, marking as future in advance of prioritization.

Comment 9

[Daniel Buchner [:dbuc]]

Pending a new UI/UX review in our run up to 1.0 in Q4 that accounts for where the app is now, I am going to mark this fixed. I will open a new ticket for that work item.