Closed Bug 606837 Opened 14 years ago Closed 14 years ago

Gray out Panorama background on inactive windows

Categories

(Firefox Graveyard :: Panorama, defect, P3)

x86
macOS
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED
Firefox 4.0b11

People

(Reporter: mitcho, Assigned: mitcho)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [good first bug][visual][Mac])

Attachments

(4 files, 4 obsolete files)

In Firefox proper, when the window is inactive, the entire chrome section, including toolbar, becomes a lighter gray. Perhaps the entire Panorama background should become a lighter gray as well, so as not to produce the ugly current situation (see attachment). Assigning to Aza to confirm spec.
Mitcho is exactly right. The background color of the screen plus the title bar's inactive color should be lighter and match.
Blocks: 598154
Priority: P4 → P3
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 4.0
Assignee: aza → ian
Assignee: ian → nobody
bugspam (moving b9 to b10)
Blocks: 608028
bugspam (removing b9)
No longer blocks: 598154
Punt
No longer blocks: 608028
Target Milestone: Firefox 4.0 → Future
Assignee: nobody → mitcho
Blocks: 627096
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Attached patch Patch v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #506124 - Flags: review?(ian)
Attachment #506125 - Flags: ui-review?(faaborg)
Comment on attachment 506125 [details] Window states with patch v1 Hmm, was hoping to flag multiple people for ui-review?... no dice.
Attachment #506125 - Flags: feedback?(shorlander)
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Sent to try, just in case, and so people can check out the builds.
Comment on attachment 506125 [details] Window states with patch v1 looks good to me. Stephen might have an opinion on the exact values used for the inactive state (perhaps it gets a little too dark at the bottom?) Fixing the line is important though, so we should probably check this in immediately and make any tweaks in follow up bugs.
Attachment #506125 - Flags: ui-review?(faaborg) → ui-review+
(In reply to comment #9) > perhaps it gets a little too dark at the bottom? Indeed, I tried to keep the same gradient differential, so it may be darkish at the bottom... maybe in inactive mode it should actually be "flat" and thus without a gradient at all? Or just a subtler one? Stephen?
Attached patch Patch v1.1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
I made a little mistake so mac try failed spectacularly. Fixed and sending back to try. Design is same as v1.
Attachment #506124 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #506229 - Flags: review?(ian)
Attachment #506124 - Flags: review?(ian)
Passed try.
Comment on attachment 506229 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1.1 >--- a/browser/themes/pinstripe/browser/tabview/tabview.css >+++ b/browser/themes/pinstripe/browser/tabview/tabview.css >@@ -5,16 +5,20 @@ body { > font-size: 12px; > line-height: 16px; > } > > #bg { > background: -moz-linear-gradient(top,#C4C4C4,#9E9E9E); > } > >+#bg.unfocused { Use :-moz-window-inactive >+ background: -moz-linear-gradient(top,#E1E1E1,#BBBBBB); "top," is redundant
Attachment #506229 - Flags: review-
Attachment #506229 - Flags: review?(ian)
Attached patch Patch v1.2 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
(In reply to comment #13) > Use :-moz-window-inactive Ah, thanks Dāo! That can lighten this patch a bit, too.
Attachment #506229 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #506395 - Flags: review?(ian)
Comment on attachment 506125 [details] Window states with patch v1 This looks good. It does seem a little dark. The native values for the inactive window gradient would be rgb(237,237,237) to rgb(216,216,216) this is also a bit flatter. I am also not sure about keeping the dark search overlay for the inactive window. It seems too close to the actual active colors when you would expect a lighter window in the background. It would be best to use the same values for the background and lighten the overlay and probably the search box. I will attach a screenshot of what I had in mind.
Attachment #506125 - Flags: feedback?(shorlander) → feedback+
(In reply to comment #16) > Created attachment 506415 [details] > Panorama inactive window with search Thanks Stephen! I used those new values. What do you think? Inactive: https://skitch.com/mitcho/rk7b8/minefield-group-your-tabs Inactive search: https://skitch.com/mitcho/rk7bn/minefield-group-your-tabs
Stephen, you can ui-review based on those skitch links I posted (sorry, a little short on time right now).
Attachment #506395 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #506436 - Flags: ui-review?(shorlander)
Attachment #506436 - Flags: review?(ian)
Attachment #506395 - Flags: review?(ian)
(In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Created attachment 506415 [details] > > Panorama inactive window with search > > Thanks Stephen! > > I used those new values. What do you think? > > Inactive: https://skitch.com/mitcho/rk7b8/minefield-group-your-tabs > Inactive search: https://skitch.com/mitcho/rk7bn/minefield-group-your-tabs Looks good! -moz-mac-chrome-inactive should give the same(or close) values instead of hardcoding.
(In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #17) > > (In reply to comment #16) > > > Created attachment 506415 [details] > > > Panorama inactive window with search > > > > Thanks Stephen! > > > > I used those new values. What do you think? > > > > Inactive: https://skitch.com/mitcho/rk7b8/minefield-group-your-tabs > > Inactive search: https://skitch.com/mitcho/rk7bn/minefield-group-your-tabs > > Looks good! -moz-mac-chrome-inactive should give the same(or close) values > instead of hardcoding. Actually, that is wrong :) Ignore that.
Attachment #506436 - Flags: ui-review?(shorlander) → ui-review+
Comment on attachment 506436 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1.3, with inactive values from Stephen >+#searchbox:-moz-window-inactive { >+ background-color: #BBBBBB; You and your tab characters! r+ with that addressed
Attachment #506436 - Flags: review?(ian) → review+
Comment on attachment 506436 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1.3, with inactive values from Stephen Bugzilla attachment.cgi temporarily down. Requesting approval in the mean time...
Attachment #506436 - Flags: approval2.0?
Comment on attachment 506436 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1.3, with inactive values from Stephen a=beltzner
Attachment #506436 - Flags: approval2.0? → approval2.0+
Attachment #506436 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 4.0b11
verified with nightly build of minefield.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Firefox → Firefox Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: