649687 - Document End of Life Plan for reps.mozilla.org

Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

(Websites :: website-archive.mozilla.org, defect)

Description

[Austin King [:ozten]]

Before this web application launches, let's document the end of life plans.

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Websites/ReMo/End_Of_Life#End_Of_Life

Please record:
* When will the campaign end? Once all existing features have been integrated into the Mozillians app.
* When is the estimated date that we will retire this website? 2.5 months.
* What are the privacy concerns for this website? User data stored in Bugzilla.
* Identify where are we collecting and storing: A Join ReMo form posts to "Mozilla Reps"/"Mentorship"
** firstname
** lastname
** age
** city
** country
** community
** email
** im
** projects
** member since date
** languages
** privacypolicy agreement
** various types of comments

Since the "backend" is bugzilla, it's quite possible it won't affect website retirement.

Comment 1

[David Boswell]

I think it is good to document this, but it is worth noting that there's a fundamental difference between ReMo and a campaign site.  ReMo is intended to be a long-lived piece of infrastructure that doesn't have a known end date.

Perhaps we can create a different set of questions that address that the issues relevant to EOL'ing a campaign site are different than issues with other types of sites?

Comment 2

[Austin King [:ozten]]

(In reply to comment #1)
Good point. I thought EOL plans was part of our standard process, regardless of type of site.

> ReMo is intended to be a long-lived piece of infrastructure that doesn't have a known end date.

Absolutely, but the reps sub-domain probably won't be a long term piece of infrastructure. This is subject to change, but this documents our current thinking and lets other teams see the longer term plan.

> Perhaps we can create a different set of questions 

Interesting, yes we probably need this for any holes in the current bug.

Comment 3

[David Boswell]

> Good point. I thought EOL plans was part of our standard process, regardless of
> type of site.

It is standard process now, but I think we've only had a chance to apply this to campaign sites just because we've happened to had a number of campaign sites launching recently.

Comment 4

[u597032]

Website is no longer active