Closed
Bug 657348
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Why are there so many 6.0a1 nightly builds?
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P2)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: ted, Assigned: catlee)
Details
(Whiteboard: [buildduty])
Attachments
(2 files)
|
3.73 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
|
555 bytes,
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
catlee
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
While looking to fix bug 649884, I noticed that we seem to have an awful lot of 6.0a1 nightly builds. The attachment has a list of all the 6.0a1 Windows symbol files from the symbol server, as well as the output of some cut | sort | uniq -c that shows that we have >1 nightly build for basically every day.
Are we really generating more than one nightly almost every day? Or do we have a project branch that doesn't have a MOZ_SYMBOLS_EXTRA_BUILDID set, so the symbol files are indistinguishable from those produced from mozilla-central?
The downside to this is that the symbol cleanup script only keeps 30 nightly builds worth of symbols around, so if we have >1 nightly per day, it winds up keeping a lot less than 30 days' worth.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Actually, it strikes me, maybe those are Win64 builds?
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → armenzg
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
There also seem to be lots of linux64-tracemonkey builds, at least two nightlies every day:
firefox-6.0a1-Linux-20110416033343-linux64-tracemonkey-symbols.txt
firefox-6.0a1-Linux-20110416040208-linux64-tracemonkey-symbols.txt
2 20110416
2 20110417
2 20110418
2 20110419
(etc)
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Actually, it strikes me, maybe those are Win64 builds?
If it was, what would I need to set MOZ_SYMBOLS_EXTRA_BUILDID to?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
It doesn't really matter, it's an arbitrary string. "win64" would be fine. That doesn't explain comment 2, though.
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Is this a side effect of bug 592244 ?
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
I think it might be one of the project branches like tracemonkey but I have not had time to look into this and I doubt I will tackled before my EOD.
From looking yesterday at how new project branches get added they already set MOZ_SYMBOLS_EXTRA_BUILDID to the branch name.
Putting back into the pool.
Assignee: armenzg → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Whiteboard: [buildduty]
| Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → catlee
Priority: -- → P2
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
turns out that all the generic projects were sharing tracemonkey's environments, which included MOZ_SYMBOLS_EXTRA_BUILDID. the extra builds are from other projects like devtools that were uploading their symbols with -tracemonkey appended.
Attachment #533289 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #533289 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #533289 -
Flags: checked-in+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•