662280 - Bump SeaMonkey version numbers on new-process repos to new version scheme

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)

Description

[Robert Kaiser]

The SeaMonkey core developers have ACKed the plan to bump the version numbers on the "new release process" repos to the new scheme as follows:

We're bumping suite/config/version.txt on comm-central to "2.4a1", on comm-aurora to "2.3a2" and on comm-beta to "2.2".

As noted in bug 662277, I need to bump version-50.txt on comm-beta in addition to that, as it's using the Mozilla 5 platform.

This bug is just here to have something to refer to in the checkin comments. ;-)

Comment 1

[Robert Kaiser]

http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/2ce1037fbf74
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-aurora/rev/ba7244526210
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-beta/rev/5fde5647d1dc

Comment 2

[Tony Mechelynck [:tonymec]]

FWIW, I have seen comm-aurora tinderbox-builds named seamonkey-2.3a2.en-US.* but all comm-central tinderbox-builds are still calling themselves 2.2a1pre, as follows, with file timestamps in PDT, from the HTTP access to ftp.mozilla.org - "dm-ftp01.mozilla.org in the Pacific Time Zone (PST/PDT)":
06-Jun-2011 17:21 seamonkey-2.2a1pre.en-US.win32.installer.exe
06-Jun-2011 17:21 seamonkey-2.2a1pre.en-US.win32.zip
06-Jun-2011 11:52 seamonkey-2.2a1pre.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2
06-Jun-2011 16:31 seamonkey-2.2a1pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2
06-Jun-2011 16:15 seamonkey-2.2a1pre.en-US.mac.dmg

Comment 3

[Justin Wood (:Callek)]

I think its b/c its dep builds, but not sure. Either way tonights nightlies *should* change.

Comment 4

[Tony Mechelynck [:tonymec]]

(In reply to comment #3)
> I think its b/c its dep builds, but not sure. Either way tonights nightlies
> *should* change.

comm-central:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110607 Firefox/7.0a1 SeaMonkey/2.4a1 ID:20110607003003
and, at http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/
seamonkey-2.4a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2	07-Jun-2011 06:29 	23M
seamonkey-2.4a1.en-US.mac.dmg			07-Jun-2011 08:29 	41M
seamonkey-2.4a1.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2	07-Jun-2011 09:43 	21M
seamonkey-2.4a1.en-US.win32.installer.exe	07-Jun-2011 12:24 	15M
seamonkey-2.4a1.en-US.win32.zip			07-Jun-2011 12:24 	19M
seamonkey-2.4a1.en-US.langpack.xpi		07-Jun-2011 12:24 	824K

comm-aurora: no nightlies AFAICT
06-Jun-2011 22:40 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-aurora-linux64/1307413821/seamonkey-2.2a1pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2
06-Jun-2011 22:42 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-aurora-macosx64/1307413821/seamonkey-2.2a1pre.en-US.mac.dmg
 the above two, too early?
07-Jun-2011 02:09 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-aurora-linux/1307413821/seamonkey-2.3a2.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2
07-Jun-2011 04:47 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-aurora-win32/1307413821/seamonkey-2.3a2.en-US.win32.installer.exe

comm-beta: no nightlies AFAICT
07-Jun-2011 03:48 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-win32/1307426133/seamonkey-2.2.en-US.win32.installer.exe
07-Jun-2011 07:23 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux/1307426133/seamonkey-2.2.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2
07-Jun-2011 12:17 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux64/1307468585/seamonkey-2.2a1pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2
07-Jun-2011 12:32 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-macosx64/1307468585/seamonkey-2.2.en-US.mac.dmg

Didn't check: debug and localized builds, mar files, files other than installable archives and langpacks

I'm setting this VERIFIED on the assumption that the *next* comm-aurora tinderbox-builds for linux64 and macosx64 will be called 2.3a2 like the others. Don't REOPEN unless they do. If some other build, later than the ones listed above, goes back to an earlier version number (not likely, but who knows), I think it'd be better to open a new bug with the "regression" keyword.

Comment 5

[Tony Mechelynck [:tonymec]]

oh-oh, the comm-beta linux64 will also have to be watched. Not reopening -yet- for an "unofficial" branch.

Comment 6

[Robert Kaiser]

The ones still reporting as 2.1a1pre might just need a clobber, but for tinderbox-builds it doesn't matter too much, and daily builds (once they get turned on for aurora) or beta builds (that go through the release machinery) will not have that problem as they're always clobbers.