Closed Bug 681062 Opened 14 years ago Closed 2 years ago

Slower than v8 on compiled dlmalloc benchmark

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

People

(Reporter: azakai, Unassigned)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

Attached file dlmalloc benchmark
Attached is dlmalloc compiled to JS. Results: m-c -m -j -p 9.273 jm -m -j -p -n 4.139 v8 2.739 TI is much better than current spidermonkey, but still significantly behind v8. I think this is fairly important since dlmalloc is real-world code, not an artificial microbenchmark. One difference from microbenchmarks is the size of the code. In bug 678939 Jan mentioned that not compiling IFEQX might be a factor in such scripts, and that should be now done on jm but not m-c, which can potentially explain some of the slowness on m-c (but not that jm is still slower than v8).
Forgot to say, those numbers are with arguments 400 400
Assignee: general → nobody
Severity: normal → S3

Should target WASM these days.
Closing as Incomplete.

Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: