Closed Bug 683416 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago
Remove build support for standalone necko and standalone xslt transformiix
Ed if you don't feel like working on this bug then please re-assign it to me.
Removes support for building standalone xslt & standalone necko. Have separated out file removals for easier review.
Attachment #557326 - Flags: review?(khuey)
Removes confvars.sh + build.mk from both content/xslt/ and netwerk/, since only used when building standalone. Post makefile changes in part 1, a bunch of files in content/xslt/src/ are now unused, so take those out too.
Attachment #557332 - Flags: review?(khuey)
Roping in the xslt owners to see if they have objections to dropping standalone transformiix.
After part A, TX_EXE is never defined: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=TX_EXE
Attachment #557333 - Flags: review?(khuey)
I'm all for this, but Peterv is the module owner.
Let's do it.
Attachment #557326 - Flags: review?(khuey) → review+
Attachment #557332 - Flags: review?(khuey) → review+
Attachment #557333 - Flags: review?(khuey) → review+
B and C are mechanical, I trust your ability to delete files correctly, so I didn't actually look at these.
Thanks khuey :-) http://tbpl.allizom.org/?tree=Try&usebuildbot=1&rev=c902a63fb74c A: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/df264cbf7b9c B: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/0c97e9647100 C: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/962b157801a6
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla9
It'd be awesome to also kill txAtoms.h and do s/txXPathAtoms|txXMLAtoms|txXSLTAtoms|txHTMLAtoms/nsGkAtoms/g
On my list for a followup :-) (Wanted to try and keep the more mechanical changes separate so khuey didn't have to actually read a 220kb patch :-))
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
That was C, and we also have: B: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0c97e9647100 A: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/df264cbf7b9c
Seeing the similar --enable-application=standalone change listed on https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_9_for_developers makes me dev-doc-needed may be appropriate for this as well. (Sorry for adding it late).
Docs updated: https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Building_Necko_standalone https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Building_XXX_Standalone Also mentioned on Firefox 9 for developers. Thanks for calling this to our attention!
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.