+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #697212 +++ Steps to reproduce (copied from bug 697212 comment 4): 1) Load http://stepheneb.github.com/avalanche2d-js/avalanche2d.html 2) Uncheck "Visualization" and "Graph" to keep this as a pure-JS test 3) press "Go" and wait for 5000 model-steps to complete 4) Press "Reset" 5) press "Go" and wait for 5000 model-steps to complete 6) record value displayed in "rate: nnnn (steps/s)" TI is making as a lot faster than Fx7 here, but we're still a bit slower than Chrome.
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
See Also: → 697212
Version: 7 Branch → Trunk
Just updated nightly and tested with the latest version of the code. Running just the model Nightly is now up to 91% of the speed of Chrome 17.0.920.1 on my system. Running the model, visualization and graph Nightly is up to 77% of the speed of Chrome 17.0.920.1 on my system. Updated benchmarks here: https://docs.google.com/a/concord.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtvlFoSBUC5kdDM4cHJhU0I4NGg5TjlWRkQ0ZExpcGc
FYI: Because the model itself is somewhat chaotic the work in running a single model-step will vary. Here's how I take these performance measurements: When I make a measurement I open the page and first run the simulation 3 times (click "Go" let the simulation complete 5000 steps, and click "Reset"). Then I take 5 measurements with the visualization and grapher ON followed by 5 more with the visualization and grapher OFF -- collecting the rate in model-steps/s.
With "Visualization" and "Graph" unchecked, I get about the same numbers as Chrome with the latest IonMonkey nighty (20000 steps per second) Without Ion it's slightly slower (18700 steps) With "Visualization" and "Graph" checked, we're still a bit slower than Chrome but that's bug 697212.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.