Closed
Bug 705249
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Thunderbird does not show attachments in messages
Categories
(MailNews Core :: MIME, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 674473
People
(Reporter: dex, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
66.05 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:9.0a2) Gecko/20111104 Firefox/9.0a2 Iceweasel/9.0a2 Build ID: 20111104042026 Steps to reproduce: Updated from version 3.1.10 to version 8.0 Actual results: Thunderbird stop displaying attachments in some new and existing letters. In old letters there is a "clip sign", which tells that there is an attachment. But when I select that letters - atachment sign just disappearing and there is no pannel with attachments. After downgrade back to 3.1.10 - attachments showing perfect.
There is some .dbf attachment but is marked by the sending program as text/plain (so readable text). Can you see if your problem is already reported as bug 695042 or bug 674473 or bug 701261?
Component: General → MIME
Product: Thunderbird → MailNews Core
QA Contact: general → mime
(In reply to :aceman from comment #1) > There is some .dbf attachment but is marked by the sending program as > text/plain (so readable text). > > Can you see if your problem is already reported as bug 695042 or bug 674473 > or bug 701261? No, this is not that problems. The main part of message views fine. Switching between viewing mode does not change anything. Letters with attached dbf files, in which "Content-Type: application/octet-stream;" displays fine. But I don`t think that there is real need to hide attachments with wrong "Content-Type"... If there`s attachment then user must have ability to save it...
(In reply to Volodia from comment #2) > But I don`t think that there is > real need to hide attachments with wrong "Content-Type"... If there`s > attachment then user must have ability to save it... I'd agree with this.
Attachment #576896 -
Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
> Content-Type: multipart/related; charset=windows-1251;boundary="-----7D81B75CCC90D2974F7A1CBD" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: multipart/related; charset=windows-1251;boundary="-----7D81B75CCC90D2974F7A1CBD"binary > -------7D81B75CCC90D2974F7A1CBD > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 > -------7D81B75CCC90D2974F7A1CBD > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="B27460_EXT_1841952.dbf" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Notwithstanding the nonsensical Content-Transfer-Encoding header, this is exactly the structure bug 674473 is about (attachment wrongfully placed into a "related" context and thus hidden now). Why do you think this is not a duplicate?
(In reply to rsx11m from comment #4) > > Content-Type: multipart/related; charset=windows-1251;boundary="-----7D81B75CCC90D2974F7A1CBD" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: multipart/related; charset=windows-1251;boundary="-----7D81B75CCC90D2974F7A1CBD"binary > > > -------7D81B75CCC90D2974F7A1CBD > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 > > > -------7D81B75CCC90D2974F7A1CBD > > Content-Type: text/plain > > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="B27460_EXT_1841952.dbf" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > > Notwithstanding the nonsensical Content-Transfer-Encoding header, this is > exactly the structure bug 674473 is about (attachment wrongfully placed into > a "related" context and thus hidden now). Why do you think this is not a > duplicate? Well, I re-read that bug and you are right. My bug-report is duplication.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•