Closed Bug 707170 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Several features about custom fields are missing in the documentation

Categories

(Bugzilla :: Documentation, defect)

4.0.2
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Bugzilla 3.4

People

(Reporter: LpSolit, Assigned: LpSolit)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

There are several features about custom fields which are missing from the documentation, see bug 291433 (since Bugzilla 3.4), bug 308253 (since 3.4), bug 251556 (since 4.0) and bug 479400 (since 4.2). Rather than splitting patches amongst these bugs, and to avoid conflict, I'm going to fix them all at once. For branches which do not have some given feature, I'm simply going to remove the relevant text from the patch.
Attached patch patch, v1Splinter Review
Attachment #578616 - Flags: review?(dkl)
Blocks: 516692
Attachment #578616 - Flags: review?(timello)
Comment on attachment 578616 [details] [diff] [review]
patch, v1

Review of attachment 578616 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Looks good. If you agree with the suggested changes, you can fix on checkin. r=dkl

::: docs/en/xml/administration.xml
@@ +2412,5 @@
>              <para>
> +              <emphasis>Reverse Relationship Description:</emphasis>
> +              When the custom field is of type <quote>Bug ID</quote>, you can
> +              enter text here which will be used as label in the referenced
> +              bug to list bugs which point to it. This gives you the ability

Only one bug can point at another bug at any given time (unlike dependencies) to this sentence is incorrect.

@@ +2458,5 @@
> +          <listitem>
> +            <para>
> +              <emphasis>Field only appears when:</emphasis>
> +              A custom field can be made visible when some criteria is met.
> +              For instance, when the bug belongs to such or such product(s),

For instance, when the bug belongs to one or more products,
Attachment #578616 - Flags: review?(dkl) → review+
(In reply to David Lawrence [:dkl] from comment #2)
> Only one bug can point at another bug at any given time (unlike
> dependencies) to this sentence is incorrect.

No, you can have several bugs pointing to the same bug. I tested this. What you cannot have is one bug pointing to several other bugs.


> For instance, when the bug belongs to one or more products,

OK, I will do this change on checkin. Thanks!
Flags: approval4.2+
Flags: approval4.0+
Flags: approval3.6+
Flags: approval3.4+
Flags: approval+
Attachment #578616 - Flags: review?(timello)
Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/trunk/
modified docs/en/xml/administration.xml
Committed revision 8040.

Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/4.2/
modified docs/en/xml/administration.xml
Committed revision 7979.

Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/4.0/
modified docs/en/xml/administration.xml
Committed revision 7667.

Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/3.6/
modified docs/en/xml/administration.xml
Committed revision 7264.

Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/3.4/
modified docs/en/xml/administration.xml
Committed revision 6815.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.