Closed Bug 715225 Opened 13 years ago Closed 12 years ago

Clean up menu contents

Categories

(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: General, defect, P2)

ARM
Android
defect

Tracking

(firefox11 verified, firefox12 verified, fennec11+)

VERIFIED FIXED
Firefox 12
Tracking Status
firefox11 --- verified
firefox12 --- verified
fennec 11+ ---

People

(Reporter: ibarlow, Assigned: bnicholson)

Details

(Keywords: polish, uiwanted)

Attachments

(1 file)

There are some items in the menu that probably shoudn't be there anymore, or should be re-ordered. 

CC-ing Madhava on this for the final list.
Assignee: nobody → madhava
It would be wonderful to have these changes complete in due time prior to the 16th string freeze date.
Assignee: madhava → nobody
OS: Mac OS X → Android
Hardware: x86 → ARM
Assignee: nobody → ibarlow
tracking-fennec: --- → 11+
Priority: -- → P3
Let's get this list ASAP :)
tracking-fennec: 11+ → ---
Priority: P3 → --
The set is

Reload
Forward
Bookmark
Share
Save as PDF
--------------- + "More" pre-ICS; the rest are in the secondary 
Clear Site Settings (disabled when not applicable)
Add-ons
Downloads
Settings
Quit

So, the delta with what we have now is:
- remove "Request Desktop Site"
- some minor reorg
- Clear Site Settings should be disabled when it's not applicable
(In reply to Madhava Enros [:madhava] from comment #3)

> So, the delta with what we have now is:
> - Clear Site Settings should be disabled when it's not applicable

FYI, this is bug 711774.
(In reply to Madhava Enros [:madhava] from comment #3)
> So, the delta with what we have now is:
> - remove "Request Desktop Site"

And this was already fixed by bug 711774. So the only thing left for this bug is:

> - some minor reorg
Doh! I meant bug 709888 in my comment above. Sorry for the spam.
Assignee: ibarlow → bnicholson
tracking-fennec: --- → 11+
Priority: -- → P2
In anticipation of bug 701824, where in this list do we want Character Encoding?
Does putting menu items into secondary have an impact on the space constraints for the menu item? If so, does that grow or shrink?
Doing a quick test on my Droid Razr, the constraints were exactly the same for vertical orientation. For horizontal orientation, the secondary list was more constrained since the primary menu expands to width of the display, but the secondary menu does not.
Attached patch patchSplinter Review
Attachment #590284 - Flags: review?(mbrubeck)
Attachment #590284 - Flags: review?(mbrubeck) → review+
Comment on attachment 590284 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

[Approval Request Comment]
trivial patch for menu reordering. no risk.
Attachment #590284 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
(In reply to Brian Nicholson (:bnicholson) from comment #9)
> Doing a quick test on my Droid Razr, the constraints were exactly the same
> for vertical orientation. For horizontal orientation, the secondary list was
> more constrained since the primary menu expands to width of the display, but
> the secondary menu does not.

That sounds to me that the constrained secondary in horizontal is still wider than in vertical?

Sounds like little l10n impact if at all, but either way, it'd be good to land this soooon if approved.
(In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #13)
> (In reply to Brian Nicholson (:bnicholson) from comment #9)
> > Doing a quick test on my Droid Razr, the constraints were exactly the same
> > for vertical orientation. For horizontal orientation, the secondary list was
> > more constrained since the primary menu expands to width of the display, but
> > the secondary menu does not.
> 
> That sounds to me that the constrained secondary in horizontal is still
> wider than in vertical?
> 
> Sounds like little l10n impact if at all, but either way, it'd be good to
> land this soooon if approved.

For me, the secondary menu was constrained to the exact same width in both orientations.
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/9b15fc2bd106
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 12
Comment on attachment 590284 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

[Triage Comment]
Mobile only - approved for Aurora.
Attachment #590284 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
Verified on M-A & M-C
Galaxy Nexus (Android 4.0.3)

20120126053754
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/9d5ede8cb11a

20120126031113
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/402b394b6623
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Firefox for Android → Firefox for Android Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: