Closed
Bug 721575
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
backport 020e61c8efed, 25fe3fddc59e and d377d38a23d3 to FF10 ESR 2
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: General, defect)
Tracking
(firefox-esr1011+ fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: akeybl, Assigned: espindola)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [qa-])
Attachments
(1 file)
7.19 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #719499 +++
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → respindola
Summary: backport 020e61c8efed, 25fe3fddc59e and d377d38a23d3 to beta → backport 020e61c8efed, 25fe3fddc59e and d377d38a23d3 to FF10 ESR 2
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
tracking-firefox-esr10:
--- → .1+
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Please land on mozilla-esr10 as soon as possible. For more information on the landing process, please see https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/ESR_Landing_Process
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=3d155a8916b6
Attachment #598207 -
Flags: review?(akeybl)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
where do I find "tracking-esr1"?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
tracking-firefox-esr10 is already set to 11+. Once you've gotten an r+, you can land on mozilla-esr10. I'm not the right person to perform that review.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #598207 -
Flags: review?(akeybl) → review?
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 598207 [details] [diff] [review] backport patches How should I land? The tree is closed, is that normal?
Attachment #598207 -
Flags: review? → review?(mh+mozilla)
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #4) > tracking-firefox-esr10 is already set to 11+. Once you've gotten an r+, you > can land on mozilla-esr10. I'm not the right person to perform that review. Why would a review be required for what basically is transplanting patches from other branches? Isn't approval enough?
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Rafael Ávila de Espíndola (:espindola) from comment #5) > How should I land? The tree is closed, is that normal? It's now approval required again, and you can use a=akeybl. I've also updated https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/ESR_Landing_Process with that part of the process. (In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] from comment #6) > Why would a review be required for what basically is transplanting patches > from other branches? Isn't approval enough? I didn't request the review.
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #7) > I didn't request the review. You did in the paragraph I quoted. "Once you've gotten an r+, you can land on mozilla-esr10."
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mozilla-Esr10&rev=8cd4656e310d
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #598207 -
Flags: review?(mh+mozilla)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
updating status-esr10 to fixed thanks to the landing in comment 9.
status-firefox-esr10:
--- → fixed
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Core → Firefox Build System
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•