Closed Bug 721794 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Add SAMPLE_LABEL for cycle collector entry points

Categories

(Core :: XPCOM, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla13

People

(Reporter: mccr8, Assigned: mccr8)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

This will get called more with bug 721543, so we should get coverage of it in the SPS.
Summary: Add SAMPLE_LABEL for forgetSkippable → Add SAMPLE_LABEL for cycle collector entry points
This covers all the major entry points, eg those that take any time at all. In my testing, forgetSkippable takes less than a ms, but it isn't only called every 250ms, so I don't imagine the extra overhead of a label will be too bad. I want to add it to the profiler in case it could become a large source of time under some circumstances. I haven't tested this yet, but I can't imagine any problems.
Assignee: nobody → continuation
Sounds ok to me. forgetSkippable isn't particularly hot code. But, is it ok to #include "sampler.h" in xpcom? Should it at least be #ifdef'ed?
(In reply to Olli Pettay [:smaug] from comment #2) > But, is it ok to #include "sampler.h" in xpcom? > Should it at least be #ifdef'ed? Why wouldn't it be okay? It is already used in one place in xpcom, in xpcom/threads/nsTimerImpl.cpp I'm not sure what you mean about being #ifdef'ed?
Because xpcom can be used in code which doesn't use tools/ I have no idea why it would be ok to #include sampler.h in xpcom by default. Benjamin might know.
Ah, that's interesting. In the worst case I can lift this out to nsJSEnvironment or whatnot, but there are a few callsites, and we'd have to remember to add the label to any new ones, which is why I was doing it like this.
Apart from the glue, which is special, this can rely on the profiler, that's not a problem. However, I really think that the header name "sampler.h" is very generic... can we make it mozilla/sampler.h as with most of our other new headers?
That's a good idea. I'll get a patch ready to apply this to the whole project.
Comment on attachment 592267 [details] [diff] [review] add SPS labels for all major CC entry points Sounds like maybe this is okay then? Just r- if I'm misunderstanding.
Attachment #592267 - Flags: review?(bugs)
Attachment #592267 - Flags: review?(bugs) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: