Closed
Bug 727987
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Assertion failure: obj, at ../../jsval.h:774 or Crash on heap (JIT) or Crash [@ js::gc::ChunkBitmap::markIfUnmarked] with OOM
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla13
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox11 | --- | wontfix |
| firefox12 | --- | affected |
| firefox13 | --- | fixed |
| firefox-esr10 | --- | wontfix |
| status1.9.2 | --- | unaffected |
People
(Reporter: decoder, Assigned: billm)
References
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression, testcase, Whiteboard: [sg:dos][js-triage-done])
Crash Data
Attachments
(1 file)
|
687 bytes,
patch
|
Waldo
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The following test asserts/crashes on mozilla-central revision 4a9a6ffd1f21:
gcparam("maxBytes", gcparam("gcBytes") + 4*(1));
arr = [1e0, 5e1, 9e19, 0.1e20, 1.3e20, 1e20, 9e20, 9.99e20,
0.1e21, 1e21, 1e21+65537, 1e21+65536, 1e21-65536, 1];
for (var i = 0; i < 4000; i++) {
arr.push(new Boolean(false));
}
When stepping through the assert, I first got this crash with options -m -n:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff7f3fcd9 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7f3fcd9 in ?? ()
#1 0x00007ffff7f3fc2e in ?? ()
#2 0x0000000000000001 in ?? ()
#3 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) x /4i $pc
=> 0x7ffff7f3fcd9: mov 0x8(%rsi),%rsi
0x7ffff7f3fcdd: movabs $0x7ffff6000250,%r11
0x7ffff7f3fce7: cmp %r11,%rsi
0x7ffff7f3fcea: je 0x7ffff7f3fcf5
(gdb) info register rsi
rsi 0x0 0
This looked like a simple null-deref. However, without any options, I get this crash:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000004b9dcc in js::gc::ChunkBitmap::markIfUnmarked (this=0xfc0b8, cell=0x0, color=0) at /srv/repos/larch/js/src/jsgc.h:666
666 if (*word & mask)
(gdb) x / 4i $pc
Invalid number "4i".
(gdb) x /4i $pc
=> 0x4b9dcc <js::gc::ChunkBitmap::markIfUnmarked(js::gc::Cell const*, uint32_t)+58>: mov (%rax),%rdx
0x4b9dcf <js::gc::ChunkBitmap::markIfUnmarked(js::gc::Cell const*, uint32_t)+61>: mov -0x10(%rbp),%rax
0x4b9dd3 <js::gc::ChunkBitmap::markIfUnmarked(js::gc::Cell const*, uint32_t)+65>: and %rdx,%rax
0x4b9dd6 <js::gc::ChunkBitmap::markIfUnmarked(js::gc::Cell const*, uint32_t)+68>: test %rax,%rax
(gdb) info register rax rdx
rax 0xfc0b8 1032376
rdx 0xfc0b8 1032376
which is certainly security-relevant. I can't judge if you can get the non-jitted crash in the browser somehow, so I'm marking this s-s.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
It's an OOM.
Assignee: general → wmccloskey
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #598006 -
Flags: review?(jwalden+bmo)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Also, we'll always crash at exactly the same address that Christian saw (0xfc0b8). I'm not sure what the security implications of that are. It seems possible that there could be important stuff there, and we're going to set a bit on that word. But I think an attacker would have to be pretty clever to exploit this.
Whiteboard: js-triage-needed → [js-triage-done]
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Heh, I'm just afraid once I see "gc" with a crash and a non-null address ^_^
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #598006 -
Flags: review?(jwalden+bmo) → review+
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [js-triage-done] → [sg:dos][js-triage-done]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla13
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•14 years ago
|
status-firefox13:
--- → fixed
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
This is a regression from bug 695756 so it affects the ESR, though it doesn't seem needed.
Blocks: 695756
status1.9.2:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox-esr10:
--- → affected
status-firefox11:
--- → wontfix
status-firefox12:
--- → affected
Keywords: regression
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
JSBugMon: This bug has been automatically verified fixed.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•14 years ago
|
Updated•13 years ago
|
Group: core-security
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•