730009 - Update SM code reviews and flag rules page

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(SeaMonkey :: Website, defect)

Description

[Jens Hatlak (:InvisibleSmiley)]

Attachment: patch

I'm going to split off the main part from bug 678833.

Changes:
* blocking -> tracking
* alpha/beta/final -> Aurora/Beta/Release
* addition of "patch fixes failing tests" to "Criteria for +" of approval section
* fixed nits

Will send links to Council in a minute.

Comment 1

[Justin Wood (:Callek)]

Comment on attachment 600071 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

No objection to these changes, but I might want to try and carve out some time to better explain my take on some of this.

Comment 2

[Ian Neal]

Comment on attachment 600071 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

>+ <li>L10n string changes (Aurora/Beta/Release are string-frozen)</li>
Worth mentioning there are very occasional exceptions - around stability back outs as there are on m-a?

Comment 3

[Jens Hatlak (:InvisibleSmiley)]

Checking in src/dev/review-and-flags.en.html;
/www/seamonkeyproject-org/src/dev/review-and-flags.en.html,v  <--  review-and-flags.en.html
new revision: 1.6; previous revision: 1.5
done

(In reply to Ian Neal from comment #2)
> >+ <li>L10n string changes (Aurora/Beta/Release are string-frozen)</li>
> Worth mentioning there are very occasional exceptions - around stability
> back outs as there are on m-a?

Added "exceptions like stability backouts on Aurora prove the rule".

Comment 4

[Tony Mechelynck [:tonymec]]

IIUC this bug is about http://www.seamonkey-project.org/dev/review-and-flags — but what about https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/SeaMonkey which "was last modified on 2 November 2010, at 16:25"? (I'm not sure if it's by the site's UTC or by my prefs' CET=+0100 but the difference is of course irrelevant here).

N.B. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/All also includes a section about SeaMonkey but I don't know if it is or isn't autogenerated from Modules/SeaMonkey (This page "was last modified on 28 June 2011, at 13:42."

Should a followup bug be opened about updating the wiki, or are the owners and peers listed there still valid?

Comment 5

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

(In reply to Tony Mechelynck [:tonymec] from comment #4)

I believe your comment is more related to bug 732698 than this one ;-)