Closed
Bug 735645
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
expose sub and sup elements in text attributes
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Core
Disability Access APIs
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla14
People
(Reporter: surkov, Assigned: maxli)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
(Keywords: access, Whiteboard: [good first bug][mentor=trev.saunders@gmail.com][lang=c++])
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
4.32 KB,
patch
|
surkov
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
follow up from bug 473569
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
fix to check sub and sup tagnames in: TextAttrsMgr::TextPosTextAttr:: GetTextPosValue(nsIFrame* aFrame) const (http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/accessible/src/base/TextAttrs.cpp?force=1#719) also please add mochitests attributes/test_text.html (after area6)
Whiteboard: [good first bug][mentor=trev.saunders@gmail.com][lang=c++]
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #611311 -
Flags: review?(trev.saunders)
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 611311 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 Review of attachment 611311 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: accessible/src/base/TextAttrs.cpp @@ +764,5 @@ > + if (tagName == nsGkAtoms::sup) { > + return eTextPosSuper; > + } else if (tagName == nsGkAtoms::sub) { > + return eTextPosSub; > + } lose the { and } as there is only one statement (this is the coding style of the module) remove the else as we do a return in the if.
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 611311 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 >+ const nsIAtom* tagName = aFrame->GetContent()->Tag(); I think GetContent can return null here. also please fix comment 3
Attachment #611311 -
Flags: review?(trev.saunders)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #611311 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #611335 -
Flags: review?(trev.saunders)
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 611335 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v2 Review of attachment 611335 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: accessible/src/base/TextAttrs.cpp @@ +760,5 @@ > } > } > > + const nsIContent* content = aFrame->GetContent(); > + if (content) { please add content->IsHTML check ::: accessible/tests/mochitest/attributes/test_text.html @@ +205,5 @@ > attrs = { "text-position": "sub" }; > testTextAttrs(ID, 128, attrs, defAttrs, 128, 142); > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > + // area7 (sup and sub elements, bug 735645) refer to bug # for details otherwise it makes me feel we have a bug @@ +603,5 @@ > </p> > > + <p id="area7"> > + <sup>superscript</sup><sub>subscript</sub> > + </p> please put it under area6 test, note it has some incorrect tests for <sup> element
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 611335 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v2 canceling review per last comment.
Attachment #611335 -
Flags: review?(trev.saunders)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → maxli
Attachment #611335 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #611613 -
Flags: review?(trev.saunders)
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 611613 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v3 The C++ looks right although I'm not sure what we should have override in cases like <sup style="text-pos:su"> I'm sort of short on time and I think Alex had some nits about tests, so I'll let him do review.
Attachment #611613 -
Flags: review?(trev.saunders) → review?(surkov.alexander)
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 611613 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v3 Review of attachment 611613 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- r=me with comment addressed ::: accessible/tests/mochitest/attributes/test_text.html @@ +156,5 @@ > > attrs = {}; > testTextAttrs(ID, 13, attrs, defAttrs, 13, 27); > > + tempElem = getNode(ID).firstChild.nextSibling; this should point to sup element (This <sup>sentence</sup> has the word) but you test second text node (has the word). maybe you could have like: var attrs = {}; var supAttrs = { "text-position": "super" } var subAttrs = { "text-position": "sub" } testTextAttrs(ID, 5, supAttrs, defAttrs, 5, 13); testTextAttrs(ID, 13, attrs, defAttrs, 13, 27); no font-size is needed since it's part of other tests
Attachment #611613 -
Flags: review?(surkov.alexander) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #10) > > attrs = {}; > > testTextAttrs(ID, 13, attrs, defAttrs, 13, 27); > > > > + tempElem = getNode(ID).firstChild.nextSibling; > > this should point to sup element (This <sup>sentence</sup> has the word) but > you test second text node (has the word). Um, the sup element gets tested the line above the one you quoted (unless I'm misunderstanding something...) > no font-size is needed since it's part of other tests If I remove that, the mochitest fails since it would otherwise expect 12pt font for the 10pt sup/sub element.
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Max Li [:maxli] from comment #11) > (In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #10) > > > > attrs = {}; > > > testTextAttrs(ID, 13, attrs, defAttrs, 13, 27); > > > > > > + tempElem = getNode(ID).firstChild.nextSibling; > > > > this should point to sup element (This <sup>sentence</sup> has the word) but > > you test second text node (has the word). > > Um, the sup element gets tested the line above the one you quoted (unless > I'm misunderstanding something...) well, these firstChild.nextSibling.oldestGrandMa are hard readable things. All they are used to get CSS vertical align computed value, I think we can hardcode it instead. > > no font-size is needed since it's part of other tests > > If I remove that, the mochitest fails since it would otherwise expect 12pt > font for the 10pt sup/sub element. I see.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
Tests updated.
Attachment #612409 -
Flags: review?(surkov.alexander)
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 612409 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v4 Review of attachment 612409 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- r=me, thank you
Attachment #612409 -
Flags: review?(surkov.alexander) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #611613 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/f3acabd0b48c
Flags: in-testsuite+
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla14
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f3acabd0b48c
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•