744162 - Update the Windows RDF for the Flash Player 11.2.202.233 Release

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Toolkit Graveyard :: Plugin Finder Service, defect)

Description

[John Pfeiffer]

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)

Steps to reproduce:

A new Flash Player will be released on Thursday 4/12/2012 at 10am PST:

RDF changes for 32-bit Windows systems:

<pfs:version>11.2.202.232</pfs:version>
<pfs:InstallerHash>sha256:9f43300386c66f76427d55584a6640993e8377cf0e0865832dee8f0e6c32e20c</pfs:InstallerHash>

RDF changes for 64-bit Windows systems:

<pfs:version>11.2.202.232</pfs:version>
<pfs:InstallerHash>sha256:ef0851f43a8b2b9c1295e83b176774ab45d3aa3b689a794a8cb1d98f061be397</pfs:InstallerHash>

Comment 1

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

taking

Comment 2

[John Pfeiffer]

Sorry for the late change, we had to rebuild. Please use the following RDF changes. Also, the release date has moved out to Friday 4/13/2012 at 10am PST:

RDF changes for 32-bit Windows systems:

<pfs:version>11.2.202.233</pfs:version>
<pfs:InstallerHash>sha256:94887c02a7bc40c844798c3ca840d53ead56203410d2a1cf49f1f557773a41a2</pfs:InstallerHash>

RDF changes for 64-bit Windows systems:

<pfs:version>11.2.202.233</pfs:version>
<pfs:InstallerHash>sha256:d60c42140f5612a818e364690f2d6ee021a45cabc0f2cfffe1d010e99939c374</pfs:InstallerHash>

Comment 3

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

Attachment: patch to update the version changes

Comment 4

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

(In reply to John Pfeiffer from comment #2)
> Sorry for the late change, we had to rebuild. Please use the following RDF
> changes. Also, the release date has moved out to Friday 4/13/2012 at 10am
> PST:
> 
> RDF changes for 32-bit Windows systems:
> 
> <pfs:version>11.2.202.233</pfs:version>
> <pfs:InstallerHash>sha256:
> 94887c02a7bc40c844798c3ca840d53ead56203410d2a1cf49f1f557773a41a2</pfs:
> InstallerHash>
> 
> RDF changes for 64-bit Windows systems:
> 
> <pfs:version>11.2.202.233</pfs:version>
> <pfs:InstallerHash>sha256:
> d60c42140f5612a818e364690f2d6ee021a45cabc0f2cfffe1d010e99939c374</pfs:
> InstallerHash>

np, updated my patch.

Comment 5

[Wil Clouser [:clouserw]]

I assume it's a bad thing if this goes out today?

Comment 6

[John Pfeiffer]

The new installers will be deployed to production today (4/12) around 5pm PST, so you should feel free to deploy the RDF changes as soon as the new installers become available.

Comment 7

[Wil Clouser [:clouserw]]

ok.  we update at 2pm so this will miss that window.  Thanks.

Comment 8

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

released - clearing flag

Comment 9

[Wil Clouser [:clouserw]]

https://github.com/mozilla/zamboni/commit/3fa8652b633cea11fc49264ac867685c0be544a9

Comment 10

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

Wil, there seems to be a problem.

https://pfs.mozilla.org/plugins/PluginFinderService.php?mimetype=application%2Fx-shockwave-flash&appID={ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}&appVersion=20120312181643&clientOS=Windows%20NT%206.1;%20WOW64&chromeLocale=en-US&appRelease=11.0

still lists a old 11.1 version for flash not the latest one. Do we have caching issues again ?

Comment 12

[Wil Clouser [:clouserw]]

This missed the 2pm window on Thursday - the next one is next Thursday at 2pm.  If this is critical we can try to get it out before then.  Let us know.

Comment 13

[Hector Zhao [:hectorz]]

https://pfs.mozilla.org/plugins/PluginFinderService.php?mimetype=application%2Fx-shockwave-flash&appID={ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}&appVersion=20120420145725&clientOS=Windows%20NT%206.1&chromeLocale=zh-CN&appRelease=12.0 still shows 11.1.102.62 for me,

https://addons.mozilla.org/services/pfs.php?mimetype=application%2Fx-shockwave-flash&appID={ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}&appVersion=20120420145725&clientOS=Windows%20NT%206.1&chromeLocale=zh-CN&appRelease=12.0 shows 11.2.202.233 as expected

Maybe https://pfs.mozilla.org/plugins/PluginFinderService.php is served using https://github.com/mozilla/zamboni/blob/master/services/pfs.py ?

Comment 14

[Wil Clouser [:clouserw]]

oremj knows how the rewrites go

Comment 15

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

can we get this fixed asap?

Comment 16

[Jeremy Orem [:oremj]]

Yes, it is using services/pfs.py

Comment 17

[Matthew N. [:MattN]]

(In reply to Jeremy Orem [:oremj] from comment #16)
> Yes, it is using services/pfs.py

Could you correct it so it points to the views.py view specified in bug 750112 comment 2?  Not sure why/how it changed.

Comment 18

[Jeremy Orem [:oremj]]

(In reply to Matthew N. [:MattN] from comment #17)
> (In reply to Jeremy Orem [:oremj] from comment #16)
> > Yes, it is using services/pfs.py
> 
> Could you correct it so it points to the views.py view specified in bug
> 750112 comment 2?  Not sure why/how it changed.

We've never used the pfs in views.py in production. We went from the php version to services/pfs.py.

Comment 19

[Kev Needham [:kev]]

Attachment: Patch PFS to current versions of Flash and Java

Patch to bring pfs.py up-to-date (Java and Flash; Director is fine). Please review and push asap.

Comment 20

[Wil Clouser [:clouserw]]

this is pushed to production.  thanks

Comment 21

[Kev Needham [:kev]]

Thanks, Wil, much appreciated. Will test and verify.

Comment 22

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

i hate to do this, but need to reopen this.

In a live test for java and shockwave it stills displays the old stuff like old java 29 update and old flash version :(

https://pfs.mozilla.org/plugins/PluginFinderService.php?mimetype=application%2Fx-shockwave-flash&appID={ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}&appVersion=20120420145725&clientOS=Windows%20NT%206.1&chromeLocale=zh-CN&appRelease=12.0

Comment 23

[Matthew N. [:MattN]]

Resolved by the AMO push yesterday plus the follow-up fix in bug 751984

Comment 24

[John Pfeiffer]

Thanks everyone, quickest turnaround yet!