Closed Bug 744940 Opened 8 years ago Closed 7 years ago

IndexedDB Support for Multi-Process Firefox


( :: Security Assurance: Review Request, task)

Not set


(Not tracked)



(Reporter: curtisk, Assigned: jst)




(Whiteboard: [pending secreview])

Who is/are the point of contact(s) for this review?
Please provide a short description of the feature / application (e.g. problem solved, use cases, etc.):
Please provide links to additional information (e.g. feature page, wiki) if available and not yet included in feature description:
Does this request block another bug? If so, please indicate the bug number This review will be scheduled amongst other requested reviews. What is the urgency or needed completion date of this review?

Please answer the following few questions: (Note: If you are asked to describe anything, 1-2 sentences shall suffice.)

Does this feature or code change affect Firefox, Thunderbird or any product or service the Mozilla ships to end users?

Are there any portions of the project that interact with 3rd party services?

Will your application/service collect user data? If so, please describe 

If you feel something is missing here or you would like to provide other kind of feedback, feel free to do so here (no limits on size):

Desired Date of review (if known from and whom to invite.
get info from JST about where this one is going
Assignee: nobody → curtisk
Assignee: curtisk → jst
No longer blocks: 666693
Blocks: 666693
Why do we need a security review for this? This is just making internal changes to existing (security reviewed) functionality. No changes to functionality at all.
Whiteboard: [pending secreview][triage needed]
Flags: needinfo?(dveditz)
Whiteboard: [pending secreview][triage needed] → [pending secreview]
There's plenty of opportunity for vulnerabilities when remoting a big feature like this but we don't need a "big picture" security review on it.
Closed: 7 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(dveditz)
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.