Closed Bug 747743 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago
Mojibake in context menus on the chat conversation
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; ja; rv:126.96.36.199) Gecko/20120306 Firefox/3.6.28 Build ID: 20120306064154 Steps to reproduce: 1. Open chat tab. 2. Connect twitter account. 3. Right click individual tweet to show its context menu. Actual results: Only the menus of twitter actions (retweet, reply, follow, ... ) has mojibake. It seems that the localized UTF-8 strings are not properly handled.
I'm a bit confused by this bug report, as: - I've tried to replace the en-US strings with strings containing UTF8 characters in my debug build, and these strings were displayed correctly. - I've tried to find the ja translation of these strings, but http://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/ja/file/tip/chat/twitter.properties doesn't exist (I've checked the URL with the French locale, and http://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/fr/file/tip/chat/twitter.properties#l20 does exist).
I've tested on Aurora build. (We haven't updated l10n-central.) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120422 Thunderbird/13.0a2 http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/l10n/mozilla-aurora/ja/file/47eeb04b0b3c/chat/twitter.properties Tooltips and options are displayed correctly.
I couldn't reproduce with a string containing French non ASCII characters, but I can reproduce using the strings in the ja localized file. It's caused by a trivial type error in the idl interface. Thanks for reporting this!
Comment on attachment 617456 [details] [diff] [review] Fix This change looks fine, thanks for fixing it Florian.
Attachment #617456 - Flags: review?(clokep) → review+
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 14.0
Attachment #617456 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora? → approval-comm-aurora+
Drive-by comment here - should the UUID for that IDL have been changed?
(In reply to Mike Conley (:mconley) from comment #6) > Drive-by comment here - should the UUID for that IDL have been changed? I don't think Thunderbird cares since we haven't turned this on, but Instantbird might...
(In reply to David :Bienvenu from comment #7) > (In reply to Mike Conley (:mconley) from comment #6) > > Drive-by comment here - should the UUID for that IDL have been changed? > > I don't think Thunderbird cares since we haven't turned this on, but > Instantbird might... I've never applied that rule for Instantbird as I'm not aware of any binary add-on using our xpcom interfaces.
Looks like this was pushed to aurora earlier today: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-aurora/rev/88ca33153d6a
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.