751520 - Give Mike Hommey access to a win7 test slave

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard :: CIDuty, task)

Description

[Mike Hommey [:glandium]]

I'm getting reftest crashes on try that I can't reproduce locally. It would be helpful to have access to a win opt test slave to do some debugging (meaning I'd need enough privileges to install debugging stuff)

LDAP account: mhommey at moco.

Comment 1

[Armen [:armenzg]]

talos-r3-w7-002 loaned. Credentials sent.

Comment 2

[Mike Hommey [:glandium]]

I'm done with that slave. I haven't done any cleanup, hearing that it would be reimaged (which would be better, considering I installed MSVC2010 on it).

However, for the same project, I have other issues I can't reproduce locally on OSX 10.6 32-bits. I would thus need access to an OSX 10.6 32-bits test slave.

Thanks

Comment 3

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

10:49 < bhearsum|buildduty> glandium: when you say "os x 32-bit test slave", do you mean the ones that run the "OS X 
                            opt" and "OS X debug" tests?
10:49 < glandium> bhearsum|buildduty: indeed
10:50 < glandium> are they 64-bits ?
10:50 < bhearsum|buildduty> they're 10.5
10:50 < glandium> but running 32-bits binaries
10:50 < glandium> oh, i thought they were 32-bits 10.6
10:51 < bhearsum|buildduty> nope
10:51 < glandium> if they're 10.5, then let me retract, i have access to a 10.5 machine
10:51 < bhearsum|buildduty> oh, ok
10:51 < bhearsum|buildduty> that's easy =)
10:51 < glandium> isn't it? :)

Comment 4

[Mike Taylor [:bear]]

this was reopened to loan a 10.6, but c#3 implies that 10.6 loaner is no longer needed and c#2 says the win7 slave is no longer needed.

is this accurate?  are you done with the win7 slave and we can recollect?

Comment 5

[Mike Hommey [:glandium]]

(In reply to Mike Taylor [:bear] from comment #4)
> this was reopened to loan a 10.6, but c#3 implies that 10.6 loaner is no
> longer needed and c#2 says the win7 slave is no longer needed.
> 
> is this accurate?  are you done with the win7 slave and we can recollect?

yes, you can.

Comment 6

[Kim Moir [:kmoir] ET]

So it looks like the machine has been reimaged.  Can it I reallocate it back to the production pool?  Slavealloc says the machine is in use due to bug 737495 but this bug points to this one which indicates the slave is no longer needed.

Comment 7

[Mike Hommey [:glandium]]

(In reply to kmoir from comment #6)
> So it looks like the machine has been reimaged.  Can it I reallocate it back
> to the production pool?

yes

Comment 8

[Kim Moir [:kmoir] ET]

Okay, done.  Closing.