759243 - Permanent, but intermittent counted as failure test_hiddenitems.xul | blur 10,slider - got [object XULElement], expected [object HTMLInputElement]

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Toolkit :: XUL Widgets, defect)

Description

[Phil Ringnalda (:philor)]

Your guess is as good as mine - could be intermittent and related to bug 575294, intermittent and unrelated, or it could be permaorange on Win PGO only and I just don't know it yet.

https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=12148097&tree=Mozilla-Inbound
Rev3 WINNT 6.1 mozilla-inbound pgo test mochitest-other on 2012-05-28 20:52:56 PDT for push 6d605438199c
slave: talos-r3-w7-074

16258 INFO TEST-START | chrome://mochitests/content/chrome/toolkit/content/tests/chrome/test_hiddenitems.xul
16259 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/chrome/toolkit/content/tests/chrome/test_hiddenitems.xul | blur 10,slider - got [object XULElement], expected [object HTMLInputElement]

Comment 1

[Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot]

philor
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=12148532&tree=Mozilla-Inbound
Rev3 WINNT 6.1 mozilla-inbound opt test mochitest-other on 2012-05-28 21:09:14
slave: talos-r3-w7-067

16259 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/chrome/toolkit/content/tests/chrome/test_hiddenitems.xul | blur 10,slider - got [object XULElement], expected [object HTMLInputElement]
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/browser/browser/components/tabview/test/browser_tabview_bug654295.js | Test timed out
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/browser/browser/components/tabview/test/browser_tabview_bug654295.js | Found a browser window after previous test timed out

Comment 2

[Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot]

philor
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=12148585&tree=Mozilla-Inbound
Rev3 WINNT 5.1 mozilla-inbound debug test mochitest-other on 2012-05-28 20:38:05
slave: talos-r3-xp-030

16140 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/chrome/toolkit/content/tests/chrome/test_hiddenitems.xul | blur 10,slider - got [object XULElement @ 0xaefed38 (native @ 0x10a163a0)], expected [object HTMLInputElement @ 0x83c7180 (native @ 0x10ecbf20)]
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/browser/browser/devtools/highlighter/test/browser_inspector_highlighter.js | transparent veil box width matches dimensions of element (no zoom) - Got 970, expected 22
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/browser/browser/devtools/highlighter/test/browser_inspector_highlighter.js | transparent veil box height matches dimensions of element (no zoom) - Got 37, expected 22

Comment 3

[Phil Ringnalda (:philor)]

Intermittent, but extremely frequent, apparently.

Comment 4

[Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot]

philor
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=12148603&tree=Mozilla-Inbound
Rev3 WINNT 5.1 mozilla-inbound opt test mochitest-other on 2012-05-28 21:19:01
slave: talos-r3-xp-070

16137 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/chrome/toolkit/content/tests/chrome/test_hiddenitems.xul | blur 10,slider - got [object XULElement], expected [object HTMLInputElement]
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/browser/browser/base/content/test/browser_bug553455.js | Should have seen the install fail - Got addon-progress-notification, expected addon-install-failed-notification
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/browser/browser/base/content/test/browser_bug553455.js | Should have seen the right message - Got Add-on downloading, expected This add-on could not be installed because it appears to be corrupt.

Comment 5

[Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot]

philor
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=12149184&tree=Mozilla-Inbound
Rev3 Fedora 12x64 mozilla-inbound debug test mochitest-other on 2012-05-28 21:30:22
slave: talos-r3-fed64-019

16187 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/chrome/toolkit/content/tests/chrome/test_hiddenitems.xul | blur 10,slider - got [object XULElement @ 0x1a06220 (native @ 0x38faa50)], expected [object HTMLInputElement @ 0x18bbcc0 (native @ 0x1f936f0)]
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | automationutils.processLeakLog() | leaked 32 bytes during test execution
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | automationutils.processLeakLog() | leaked 1 instance of GenericFactory with size 32 bytes

Comment 6

[Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot]

philor
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=12149028&tree=Mozilla-Inbound
Rev4 MacOSX Lion 10.7 mozilla-inbound opt test mochitest-other on 2012-05-28 21:44:18
slave: talos-r4-lion-077

15597 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/chrome/toolkit/content/tests/chrome/test_hiddenitems.xul | blur 6,slider - got [object XULElement], expected [object HTMLInputElement]
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/browser/browser/base/content/test/browser_homeDrop.js | Test timed out
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/browser/browser/base/content/test/browser_homeDrop.js | expectUncaughtException was called but no uncaught exception was detected!

Comment 7

[Phil Ringnalda (:philor)]

Okay, that's scary - it wasn't intermittent, it was permanent, but it wasn't counted as a failure, so unless something else in the run failed, it showed as green - https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=12145939&tree=Mozilla-Inbound is the log for one of the "green" runs on your push. Backed out, but, how did that not count as a failure?

Comment 8

[Phil Ringnalda (:philor)]

One possible explanation - bug 678420 was a test that failed, then navigated back in history, loading the previous test into the current test's context, hiding its failures.

Comment 9

[Mats Palmgren (PTO)]

Attachment: fix

There's a bug in the preceding test, test_focus_anons.xul - it doesn't
remove its blur event listener at the end of the test, so it depends
on the bug that part 1 in bug 575294 fixes.

https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?usebuildbot=1&tree=Try&rev=2f33cd615bac

Comment 10

[Mats Palmgren (PTO)]

BTW, backing out was the right call.  It's really scary that we can have failures
like this and still report the test run as succeeding.  Do you know if we have a
bug open on this?

Comment 11

[Phil Ringnalda (:philor)]

Yeah, bug 677964, though so far nobody seems to have had any ideas about it.

Comment 12

[Phil Ringnalda (:philor)]

Comment on attachment 628103 [details] [diff] [review]
fix

lgtm

Comment 13

[Mats Palmgren (PTO)]

https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/2eefd38b71f1

Comment 14

[Ed Morley [:emorley]]

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/2eefd38b71f1