Closed
Bug 769369
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
[ARMv6] Fennec loses responsiveness after time
Categories
(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: General, defect)
Tracking
(firefox16-)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox16 | - | --- |
People
(Reporter: nhirata, Assigned: kats)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [ARMv6])
Attachments
(1 file)
731.43 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
1. go to youtube.com
2. pan around
3. go to hulu.com
4. pan around
5. go to newground.com
6. pan around
Expected: responsive and will continue to pan
Actual: sluggish response
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Phone, 2.2?
Summary: [arm v6] Fennec loses responsiveness after time → [ARMv6] Fennec loses responsiveness after time
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Samsung GT-I5510, Android 2.2
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [ARMv6]
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Adding qawanted to see if this still reproduces. If so, we should get mobile devs to take a look at the issues.
tracking-firefox16:
--- → +
Keywords: qawanted
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
I don't have the device, I brought it back to mnt View so this task can be done by another QA.
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
I have the device with me looking at it will be down the queue as it is below the minimum specs put forth.
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kevin Brosnan [:kbrosnan] from comment #6)
> I have the device with me looking at it will be down the queue as it is
> below the minimum specs put forth.
I don't think we need to keep a hard and fast rule of minimum specs (at least for blocklisting). A quality evaluation was never given for this phone at https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Fennec/Armv6Compatibility, so it's unclear if the phone runs ARMv6 builds well.
If the phone functions well, we should try to fix this issue, regardless of minimum specs.
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
This is also reproducible on Lg Optimus One P500 (Android 2.2) using the latest Nightly 18.0a1 2012-09-03. Furthermore following the same STR from comment0 using a Armv7 low-end device HTC Desire (2.2) i observed that there is no big difference in functionality between the two devices.
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
The devices listed here are just under our draft minimum spec, so there's little reason to believe this won't happen with in-spec devices.
Brad - can you reassign for FF16 investigation?
Assignee: nobody → blassey.bugs
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: blassey.bugs → bugmail.mozilla
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Aaron, are you able to repro on any device we have in Toronto?
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Also as a note to my future self: the first patch on bug 781883 may have helped with this, since GeckoApp was restarted 5 times over the logcat capture period.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
I'm not able to reproduce on an ARMv6 Xperia running 2.3.4 and the latest nightly, so I don't think this affects all ARMv6 phones. I'll need to get my hands on a device where this is reproducible to debug it.
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kartikaya Gupta (:kats) from comment #10)
> Aaron, are you able to repro on any device we have in Toronto?
I haven't seen this on the Samsung Gio, nor the HTC Legend.
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #9)
> The devices listed here are just under our draft minimum spec, so there's
> little reason to believe this won't happen with in-spec devices.
>
> Brad - can you reassign for FF16 investigation?
Based on where we are with the cycle, the lack of movement and the inability to reproduce this with an in-spec device, do we still want to track this?
Keywords: qawanted
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Aaron Train [:aaronmt] from comment #14)
> (In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #9)
> > The devices listed here are just under our draft minimum spec, so there's
> > little reason to believe this won't happen with in-spec devices.
> >
> > Brad - can you reassign for FF16 investigation?
>
> Based on where we are with the cycle, the lack of movement and the inability
> to reproduce this with an in-spec device, do we still want to track this?
Agreed, given the lack of reproducibility we'll untrack.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
I'm unable to reproduce the sluggishness using the STR in comment 0 on a GT-I5510M running 2.2.2 using the latest nightly. Closing WFM; please reopen if needed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Updated•4 years ago
|
Product: Firefox for Android → Firefox for Android Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•