Closed
Bug 769533
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
get rid of AppendwithConversion
Categories
(Core :: XPCOM, defect)
Core
XPCOM
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla16
People
(Reporter: m_kato, Assigned: m_kato)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
9.48 KB,
patch
|
justin.lebar+bug
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.44 KB,
patch
|
justin.lebar+bug
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Attachment #637775 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #637776 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
I can review this early next week if you like, Makoto. My review load is probably lower than dbaron's.
That's fine. I think the main interesting thing to investigate is whether the removal of the null-check is safe for all of the char*/PRUnichar* callers.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #637775 -
Flags: review?(dbaron) → review?(justin.lebar+bug)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #637776 -
Flags: review?(dbaron) → review?(justin.lebar+bug)
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 637775 [details] [diff] [review]
replace AppendWithConversion with others
># HG changeset patch
># Parent 2791940fb1ff454482ed91a76c9865c14b7b924e
>
>Part 1: replace AppendWithConversion with others
>
>dbaron: I think the main interesting thing to investigate is whether the
>removal of the null-check is safe for all of the char*/PRUnichar* callers.
I'm not sure what you mean -- AppendASCIItoUTF16 and LossyAppendUTF16toASCII both do null-checks on the pointers, so we should be good, right?
r=me pending dbaron's confirming that I'm not missing something here.
Attachment #637775 -
Flags: review?(justin.lebar+bug) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #637776 -
Flags: review?(justin.lebar+bug) → review+
(In reply to Justin Lebar [:jlebar] from comment #4)
> I'm not sure what you mean -- AppendASCIItoUTF16 and LossyAppendUTF16toASCII
> both do null-checks on the pointers, so we should be good, right?
Oh, right.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/3c3fc27e9746
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/5a96f6193e75
Assignee: nobody → m_kato
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla16
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/3c3fc27e9746
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5a96f6193e75
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•4 years ago
|
Component: String → XPCOM
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•