Open
Bug 776324
Opened 12 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
remove support for RFC 2231 continuation parameters in HTTP header field parameters
Categories
(Firefox :: File Handling, defect)
Firefox
File Handling
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: julian.reschke, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug, Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
1.36 KB,
patch
|
jduell.mcbugs
:
review-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
RFC 2231 parameter continuations aren't needed in HTTP (which doesn't have MIME's line length restrictions), and aren't widely implemented (see http://greenbytes.de/tech/tc2231/#encoding-2231-cont -- they are unsupported in Safari, Chrome, and IE). The existing code will need to be kept for MIME header field parsing (as long as the mail client uses nsMIMEHeaderParams) though.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #644750 -
Flags: review?(jduell.mcbugs)
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 644750 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch Review of attachment 644750 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- This doesn't look like a patch to remove support for RFC 2231 continuation parameters in HTTP header fields: it looks like a patch to remove some old broken-but-long-supported content-disposition behaviors (like using 'name' instead of 'filename'. Did you attach the right patch here Julian?
Attachment #644750 -
Flags: review?(jduell.mcbugs) → review-
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jason Duell (:jduell) from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 644750 [details] [diff] [review] > Proposed patch > > Review of attachment 644750 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > This doesn't look like a patch to remove support for RFC 2231 continuation > parameters in HTTP header fields: it looks like a patch to remove some old > broken-but-long-supported content-disposition behaviors (like using 'name' > instead of 'filename'. Did you attach the right patch here Julian? No, I did not. Sorry for the confusion :-)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Julian Reschke from comment #3) > No, I did not. Sorry for the confusion :-) Actually, it was the correct patch applied to the wrong bug :-)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: Core → Firefox
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•