806890 - [mr] translate Mozilla Annual Report for 2011 ("State of Mozilla")

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(www.mozilla.org :: L10N, defect)

Description

[Pascal Chevrel:pascalc]

The Mozilla annual report, called State of Mozilla, will be public on November 11. If your translation, is ready for this date, it will be published and promoted simultaneously as English, but since mozilla.org does continuous deployment, we can of course push your translation whenever it is ready of course.

This year the report is on 2 pages but longer pages than last year.

The pages on the staging site is there:
https://www-demo1.allizom.org/b/mr/foundation/annualreport/2011/
https://www-demo1.allizom.org/b/mr/foundation/annualreport/2011/faq

Note that the pages design is not final but the text content is, so you will probably see visual changes to this page before it becomes public.

There are videos linked but they are not available, as soon as we have them, we will probably use the Universal Subtitles service to translate them.

There are 2 lang files to translate:
https://svn.mozilla.org/projects/mozilla.com/trunk/locales/fr/foundation/annualreport/2011faq.lang
https://svn.mozilla.org/projects/mozilla.com/trunk/locales/fr/foundation/annualreport/2011.lang

As usual, send these translation directly on svn or attach the files to this bug and I will send them myself. Use a pure text editor and make sure the file is saved in UTF8

If you see visual issues for your locale (bad fonts, overflowing content, margins...), please indicate it in this bug.

There is one string that has two undefined numerals in the same sentence (we don't have the numbers yet) that may cause problem for locales with complex plurals (Breton, Polish...) but should not be a problem for most of the locales, here it is:

Mozillaâs consolidated reported revenue (Mozilla Foundation and all subsidiaries) for 2011 was %(revenue)s million, up approximately %(increase)s percent from 2010.

As soon as we get these numbers, I will spread this information so as that you can adjust your sentence if necessary.

If you have any problem, don't hesitate to ask me!

Thanks

Pascal

Comment 1

[Pascal Chevrel:pascalc]

Wontfixing for your locale

Comment 2

[Aniket Deshpande]

(In reply to Pascal Chevrel:pascalc from comment #1)
> Wontfixing for your locale

why the bug is marked as resolved? why won't you fix for the locale?

Comment 3

[Pascal Chevrel:pascalc]

Aniket are you volunteering to work on this bug? I am marking as wontfix because nobody stepped in to translate those pages in the last 6 months and at some point, we need to move on, but if you want to do it, I'll be happy to reopen and prepare the server for your locale :)

Comment 4

[Aniket Deshpande]

Yes, i am working on this bug. The translation is still not complete. I need some time probably a week.

Comment 5

[Pascal Chevrel:pascalc]

reopening then :)

Comment 6

[Aniket Deshpande]

Attachment: annual report 2011

please review.

Comment 7

[sandeep shedmake]

(In reply to aniket from comment #6)
> Created attachment 733757 [details]
> annual report 2011
>

Thanks for localization.
 
> please review.

Would look into it. 
Stay tuned!

-Sandeep

Comment 8

[sandeep shedmake]

Attachment: l10n review

From Comment 7,

Translations reviewed (please see the diff via attachment titled 'l10n.patch').


Following were observed while review process:

+ Extra white-space should be avoided
+ Punctuation marks should be intact
+ Maintain FUEL compatibility for terminology consistency
+ Proofread translations before submitting for review
+ Long sentence(s) needs extra proofreading


Aniket, 
1) Please incorporate the said corrections mentioned in attachment titled 'l10n.patch' 
2) Re-submit the revised translation patch (set flag: review ? as [e-mail]).

Comment 9

[Aniket Deshpande]

Hi Sandeep,
  
   Thanks for reviewing and marking out the mistakes. I will sumbit the revised translation patch soon.

Regards,
Aniket

Comment 10

[Aniket Deshpande]

Attachment: revised l10n patch

sorry for the white spaces. I have a few questions though.

Comment 11

[sandeep shedmake]

(In reply to aniket from comment #10)
> Created attachment 735119 [details] [diff] [review]
> revised l10n patch
> 
> sorry for the white spaces. I have a few questions though.

What are the questions?

I guess one would be: whether to use 'Mozillaसाठी' or 'Mozilla साठी'. 
'Mozillaसाठी' is preferred.
Reference: http://tinyurl.com/cxh9p4k >> शब्दयोगी अव्यय >> शब्दाला जोडून येणारे अव्यय.


-Sandeep

Comment 12

[Aniket Deshpande]

Yes, that was one of the question. We need more proofreading for larger strings. My question is can we localize the file in parts? I think we will have better proofreading from this and it will be easier to maintain terminology conisitency.

Aniket

Comment 13

[sandeep shedmake]

(In reply to aniket from comment #12)
> Yes, that was one of the question. We need more proofreading for larger
> strings. My question is can we localize the file in parts? I think we will
> have better proofreading from this and it will be easier to maintain
> terminology conisitency.
> 
> Aniket

Despite strings being short or large; proofreading is essential post-localization to maintain quality translation(s). 

I prefer translating a file fully and later proofreading it post localization.

If you wish to proofread your last submitted translations in Comment 10, you can do so. Else, i can proceed with review.

Looking forward...


-Sandeep

Comment 14

[Aniket Deshpande]

(In reply to sandeep shedmake from comment #13)
> (In reply to aniket from comment #12)
> > Yes, that was one of the question. We need more proofreading for larger
> > strings. My question is can we localize the file in parts? I think we will
> > have better proofreading from this and it will be easier to maintain
> > terminology conisitency.
> > 
> > Aniket
> 
> Despite strings being short or large; proofreading is essential
> post-localization to maintain quality translation(s). 
> 
> I prefer translating a file fully and later proofreading it post
> localization.
> 
> If you wish to proofread your last submitted translations in Comment 10, you
> can do so. Else, i can proceed with review.
> 
> Looking forward...
> 
> 
> -Sandeep

I proofread the file submitted. I do not wish to proofread it again. Please review.

Aniket

Comment 15

[sandeep shedmake]

Comment on attachment 735119 [details] [diff] [review]
revised l10n patch

patch looks good.

Thanks
-Sandeep

Comment 16

[sandeep shedmake]

Attachment: Final Marathi reviewed localization for 2011.lang file

'735119: revised l10n patch' submitted in Comment 10 applied successfully. 


From Comment 5, Comment 6 and Comment 15,

Thanks Aniket for your localization time and effort.

Pascal, looking forward with respect to resolution of this bug.


Regards
-Sandeep

Comment 17

[sandeep shedmake]

Comment on attachment 735676 [details]
Final Marathi reviewed localization for 2011.lang file

Aniket, hope you localize (and proofread) the faq.lang file as well to fix this bug.

Looking forward...


-Sandeep

Comment 18

[Aniket Deshpande]

Hi Sandeep,
   Thank you for reviewing the patch. I am yet to complete with the faq.lang file. I will submit it as soon as i localize and proofread it.

Regards,
Aniket.

Comment 19

[Aniket Deshpande]

Attachment: 2011 FAQ

Hi Sandeep,
   This is the localized file for 2011 faq.please review.

Aniket.

Comment 20

[sandeep shedmake]

Comment on attachment 740932 [details]
2011 FAQ

setting review flag to [e-mail]

Comment 21

[sandeep shedmake]

Comment on attachment 740932 [details]
2011 FAQ

From Comment 19 and Comment 20

Firstly, thanks for the localization. Nice work!!


Translations reviewed (please see the diff via http://pastebin.mozilla.org/2386702).


Following were observed while review process:
+ Take care of currency conversion (while converting USD amount to Rupee amount, current USD-INR conversion rate is very important)
+ Grammatical correction required in couple of translations (rest seems good to me)


Aniket, 
1) Please incorporate the said corrections mentioned in http://pastebin.mozilla.org/2386702
2) Re-submit the revised translation patch (set flag: review ? as [e-mail]).


-Sandeep

Comment 22

[Aniket Deshpande]

Attachment: patch for 2011 faq

Hi,
   I am submitting the patch for 2011 faq with the said corrections. Thank you Sandeep for all your help. Looking forward for more work! I have a question, now that i have done my second bug, where do i request for Level 1 Access?
         
Regards,
Aniket.

Comment 23

[sandeep shedmake]

Comment on attachment 747954 [details] [diff] [review]
patch for 2011 faq

Patch looks good.


Thanks.
-Sandeep

Comment 24

[Pascal Chevrel:pascalc]

Sandeep, can you commit the patches to svn please? Thanks

Comment 25

[sandeep shedmake]

Attachment: Final Marathi reviewed localization for 2011faq.lang

'747954: patch for 2011 faq' submitted in Comment 22 applied successfully.

Comment 26

[sandeep shedmake]

Committed via r115847 .

Thanks.
-Sandeep

Comment 27

[sandeep shedmake]

From Comment 24 and Comment 26,

Marking this bug as FIXED.

Comment 28

[Aniket Deshpande]

Thank you Sandeep :)