Closed
Bug 809143
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Get Jetpack tests running on automated Fennec test infrastructure
Categories
(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: General, defect)
Add-on SDK Graveyard
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: KWierso, Unassigned)
References
Details
Jetpack's support of Fennec is getting to the point where we should start getting automated tests running, to make sure we don't regress anything.
I'm not entirely sure what getting this all set up would entail, as I haven't really attempted much manual testing with Android. Matteo would probably know more.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
I think for starters, setting up tests on the Jetpack tree for "Android 2.2 Armv6 opt" and for "Android 2.2 opt" would be sufficient, though getting the debug versions tested too would be better.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Is there any progress about it? We can't really claims that Mobile is supported by SDK until we don't have the automated tests properly running on Tinderbox. At the moment we'll continue to have the Mobile support as "experimental", but we should leave this status sooner rather than later.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → jsantell
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Unassigning myself from bugs I haven't gotten around to
Assignee: jsantell → nobody
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: sdk-test-issues
Updated•10 years ago
|
Summary: Get Jetpack tests running on Fennec in the test infrastructure → Get Jetpack tests running on automated Fennec test infrastructure
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: sdk-fennec
Updated•10 years ago
|
Severity: normal → critical
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
What would it take to enable the mochi-jp suite for Fennec?
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend)
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Erik Vold [:erikvold] (please needinfo? me) from comment #4)
> What would it take to enable the mochi-jp suite for Fennec?
It's been so long since I looked at this that I'm afraid I don't know anymore. I could guess that the harness JS would need some changes as would runtests.py but that's probably not helpful.
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Priority: P1 → --
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Add-on SDK is no longer supported so resolving bugs as INCOMPLETE
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•