Please do not proliferate prefixes anymore.
Hmm. So the idea would be to not parse :scope, right?
I bore @supports in mind.
Sure. I'll see what I can cook up, I guess.
Created attachment 690052 [details] [diff] [review] Add a preference to control :scope and pref it off. Just preffed off for now until we have a setup for auto-preffing-off on beta/release, I guess
5 years ago
I guess ifdefs in all.js based on MOZ_UPDATE_CHANNEL would work for the actual builds, but would confuse everybody doing their own build (since that has MOZ_UPDATE_CHANNEL set to default)?
Yeah... We really need a better solution for this stuff. Also, I think we should actually use the same pref as <style scoped> for :scope. I'm just not sure what that is.
My patches for <style scoped> don't actually use a pref at the moment (I misremembered that they did).
Note that I'm also fine with shipping :scope unprefixed and unpreffed. Not sure how happy everyone else is with that, though.
Comment on attachment 690052 [details] [diff] [review] Add a preference to control :scope and pref it off. Why don't you leave it on for nightly/aurora using the mechanism added in bug 820148 (though see bug 814530 -- I'm not completely confident it works yet)? r=dbaron
er, meant to say "though see bug 814530 comment 6"
> Why don't you leave it on for nightly/aurora using the mechanism added in bug 820148 That's the plan once that mechanism works; this patch predates that mechanism existing...
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/066cdafa5ec3 using the new ifdef magic.
Is there a bug for preffing this on? What are the conditions for this to happen? RELEASE_BUILD has the side effect of making it opaque if and when we can start using new CSS features in our code base.
> Is there a bug for preffing this on? Not yet. > What are the conditions for this to happen? Not clear yet. :(
That said, I think we should enable this and scoped stylesheets together, so the conditions should be the same.
I didn't put the scoped stylesheets support behind a pref.
OK. Should we just go ahead and unpref :scope then? Scoped stylesheets are m-c only, right?
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky (:bz) from comment #18) > OK. Should we just go ahead and unpref :scope then? Well... should we be taking into account how far advanced the relevant specification is? :scope is in Selectors 4, which is a WD at the moment. I don't remember what "rules" CSS WG members have in terms of unprefixed implementations. As for the feature itself, I can't really see it changing much that would need us to have it be prefixed, really. > Scoped stylesheets are m-c only, right? Yes. I realise now though that I did not do anything special to make :scope match the style scope element in scoped style sheets. I guess I should do that...
Docs: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:scope (with a live sample ;-) ) and https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox/Releases/20