Open
Bug 819496
Opened 12 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
offline data domain is listed in non-private window
Categories
(Firefox :: Private Browsing, defect)
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: jbecerra, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [testday-20121207])
Using latest birch nightly, if I am in per-window private browsing mode and I visit a page that can request permission to store data for offline use, when the private browsing window is closed, the domain name (and possibly cached data) remains in the list of sites that can store data. Steps: 1. Launch the browser and open a page. 2. Open a PB window using command-shift-p 3. Go to https://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/01/offline-web-applications/ 4. Click on the todo demo link (shortened) http://is.gd/RNGOU6 5. When prompted, allow the site to store data for offline use. 6. Try addin a task 7. Close the PB window 8. Go to the advanced tab in preferences window and select the network section Expected: There should be nothing about the site you just visited and allowed to store data Actual: You can see developer.mozilla.org listed and some number regarding storage used.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [testday-20121207]
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Hmm, Josh I thought we fixed this at some point, but I can't find the bug number...
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Unfortunately offline app storage uses the permission manager, which doesn't (and never has) had any concept of temporary permissions for private browsing. It's a problem, to be sure, but since this isn't a regression I don't think it needs to block the release of per-window private browsing.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
This happens in the latest Fx18b3 as well.
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2) > Unfortunately offline app storage uses the permission manager, which doesn't > (and never has) had any concept of temporary permissions for private browsing. > It's a problem, to be sure, but since this isn't a regression I don't think it > needs to block the release of per-window private browsing. Agreed. Who should be CCed here?
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•