822790 - Privacy technical followup for spdy persistent cwnd setting

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(mozilla.org :: Security Assurance: Review Request, task)

Description

[Patrick McManus [:mcmanus]]

Initial Questions:

Project/Feature Name: spdy persistent cwnd setting
Tracking  ID:822745
Description:
seeking technical privacy review

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822745#c0
http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol/spdy-protocol-draft3#TOC-2.6.4-SETTINGS
Additional Information:

Urgency: 2-4 weeks
Key Initiative: Firefox Desktop
Release Date: 
Project Status: development
Mozilla Data: Yes
New or Change: Existing
Mozilla Project: none
Mozilla Related: firefox all 
Separate Party: No

Security Review Questions:

Affects Products: 
Review Due Date: 
Review Invitees: 
Extra Information:

Comment 1

[Curtis Koenig [:curtisk-use curtis.koenig+bzATgmail.com]]]

I'm confused this bug is for a security review but the notes say privacy review?

Comment 2

[Patrick McManus [:mcmanus]]

I filled out https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/form.moz.project.review as per https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/HowTo/Privacy_Review

and it magically opened a series of bugs on my behalf. This is one of them. All I seek is a privacy review on 822745 - your assistance in the process would be appreciated.

Comment 3

[Curtis Koenig [:curtisk-use curtis.koenig+bzATgmail.com]]]

that is what I needed to know, we will get this started

Comment 4

[Curtis Koenig [:curtisk-use curtis.koenig+bzATgmail.com]]]

Please fill out the form on this wiki and notify my when done to check it before we send it on to a privacy champ

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Reviews/Persistent_SPDY_CWND

Comment 5

[Patrick McManus [:mcmanus]]

(In reply to Curtis Koenig [:curtisk] from comment #4)
> Please fill out the form on this wiki and notify my when done to check it
> before we send it on to a privacy champ
> 
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Reviews/Persistent_SPDY_CWND

ok

Comment 6

[Curtis Koenig [:curtisk-use curtis.koenig+bzATgmail.com]]]

I believe Tom reviewed this before he moved on and he didn't raise any flags. So I am going to close this one resolved-fixed.