Closed Bug 832503 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

support B2G v1.0.x, v1.1 and v2 branches

Categories

(Release Engineering :: General, defect)

x86
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: joduinn, Assigned: joduinn)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [re-b2g])

Attachments

(4 files)

1) on github: create v1.0.0 branch in gaia repo, from the 15jan tag. 
2) on github: create v1-train branch in gaia repo, from shira. 

3) on hg.m.o: create gaia-1_0_0 and gaia-v1-train repos in hg. Tracked in bug#832479
4) on hg.m.o: adjust vcs2vcs mirroring to support gaia-1_0_0 and gaia-v1-train repos

5) on hg: switch b2g18 gecko in-tree configs to use v1.0.0 gaia (which is gaia-v1_0_0 in hg)

6) on hg: switch "date" gecko in-tree configs to use v1-train gaia (which is gaia-v1-train in hg).

7) on github: remove nightly and shira from gaia repo

note: final decision on whether to create v1.0.0 and v1-train versions of b2g-manifest is being deferred for now. It doesnt block the above work, investigations will be continued next week.
(In reply to John O'Duinn [:joduinn] from comment #0)
> 1) on github: create v1.0.0 branch in gaia repo, from the 15jan tag. 
> 2) on github: create v1-train branch in gaia repo, from shira. 
> 
> 3) on hg.m.o: create gaia-1_0_0 and gaia-v1-train repos in hg. Tracked in
> bug#832479
> 4) on hg.m.o: adjust vcs2vcs mirroring to support gaia-1_0_0 and
> gaia-v1-train repos
> 
> 5) on hg: switch b2g18 gecko in-tree configs to use v1.0.0 gaia (which is
> gaia-v1_0_0 in hg)
bah, typo even after multiple reviews. This should be:
5) on hg: switch b2g18 gecko in-tree configs to use v1.0.0 gaia (which is gaia-1_0_0 in hg)


> 6) on hg: switch "date" gecko in-tree configs to use v1-train gaia (which is
> gaia-v1-train in hg).
> 
> 7) on github: remove nightly and shira from gaia repo
> 
> note: final decision on whether to create v1.0.0 and v1-train versions of
> b2g-manifest is being deferred for now. It doesnt block the above work,
> investigations will be continued next week.
r+ from hwine on irc
Attachment #704087 - Flags: review+
Attachment #704091 - Flags: review?(hwine)
Comment on attachment 704091 [details] [diff] [review]
b2g config changes for date

lgtm, as I understand the white board ;)
Attachment #704091 - Flags: review?(hwine) → review+
Attachment #704091 - Flags: checked-in+
Attachment #704087 - Flags: approval-mozilla-b2g18?
date branch is on fire after landing Attachment #704091 [details] [diff]. looks like gaia-v1-train (nee shira) is waaaay out of date in the upstream github repo.
catlee: per email, akeybl gives a+ to land on b2g18.
Comment on attachment 704087 [details] [diff] [review]
b2g config changes for b2g18

a+ from akeybl via email
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g18/rev/a9a3a184d9b1
Attachment #704087 - Flags: approval-mozilla-b2g18? → checked-in+
Depends on: 833408
Comment on attachment 705025 [details] [diff] [review]
make date like mozilla-b2g18

Do we want unagi_stable here? (for dogfooders).
If so, we may want to make double sure that these aren't going to conflict with and/or overwrite the b2g18 ones.
Attachment #705025 - Flags: review? → review+
Attachment #705025 - Flags: checked-in+
in production
We're hitting graph server submission errors on linux and linux64 builds, eg
  No machine_name called 'Linux_date' can be found
(In reply to Nick Thomas [:nthomas] from comment #11)
> We're hitting graph server submission errors on linux and linux64 builds, eg
>   No machine_name called 'Linux_date' can be found

A quick look on tbpl.m.o for "date", shows no talos results for linux, linux64. Maybe something needs to be added to graphserver db?
Assignee: nobody → hwine
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Whiteboard: [re-b2g]
Depends on: 835005
Depends on: 835865
Missing entries based on bug 834570 - should resolve these issues
Attachment #707706 - Flags: review?(armenzg)
Attachment #707706 - Flags: review?(armenzg) → review+
Comment on attachment 707706 [details] [diff] [review]
missing entries for date

pushed changes to production and staging

landed details:
 http://hg.mozilla.org/graphs/rev/699fdadabd51
Attachment #707706 - Flags: checked-in+
from a quick read of dep.bug#834789, it looks like "nightly" will be removed from b2g-manifests as well as gaia. 

Unclear - should we revert bug#822970 and enable master branch in bug#820955?
per convo w/hwine last night, I'm grabbing this to make this bug match reality. Its really a tracking bug, with the remaining real work being done in dep bugs.
Assignee: hwine → joduinn
afaict, we're all done here. If there's anything else, please file new followup bugs.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: