Closed Bug 847370 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

HTMLMediaElement - crossOrigin vs crossorigin

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

Product:
Core
Component:
DOM: Core & HTML
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

()

Status:
RESOLVED FIXED
Milestone:
mozilla22

People

(Reporter: baku, Assigned: baku)

References

Details

(Keywords: dev-doc-complete, site-compat)

Attachments

(1 file)

patch
9.67 KB, patch
bzbarsky
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review 
The IDL file has crossorigin but the specs say crossOrigin.
Easy to fix, but I don't know how many sites we are going to break...
We do spell it crossOrigin in HTMLImageElement (as do other browsers)... Other browsers do not appear to have it on HTMLMediaElement yet so I think it should be relatively safe to rename.
Assignee: nobody → amarchesini
Depends on: 842986
Attached patch patch — — Splinter Review 

        Attachment #720680 -
        Flags: review?(bzbarsky)

    
    

    
  
Comment on attachment 720680 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

r=me

As Anne said, the number of sites using this is almost certainly 0.

        Attachment #720680 -
        Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review+

    
  
Depends on: 841493

    
    

    
  
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8c128b49091f
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite-
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla22

    
    

    
  
I've added this bug to the compatibility doc. Please correct the info if wrong.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Site_Compatibility_for_Firefox_22
Keywords: site-compat
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML

          You need to log in
          before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.