Closed
Bug 84882
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Need turbo mode setting in browser prefs
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Preferences, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla0.9.2
People
(Reporter: slogan, Assigned: slogan)
References
Details
Attachments
(6 files)
4.51 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
4.51 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
4.51 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
6.77 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
16.11 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
45.73 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details |
Need to allow the user at install time to specify if the turbo mode should be
enabled or not. Also need preferences to allow the user to turn on and off turbo
mode.
Next step is to figure out how to handle setting and clearing of turbo mode in
both the native install and in the prefs panel.
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
Syd, please don't use the word "Turbo" etc in the UI. (If we're going to use any
cute gimmicky names, it should be "Silvia", but I feel I'll be outvoted on
that). Anyhow, Turbo really doesn't describe what the functionality does.
This is better but not perfect:
<!ENTITY enableTurbo.label "Start &brandShortName; silently when I start my
computer">
Again, not perfect, but better:
-IDC Turbo Mode=&Obtain faster startup times by executing in turbo mode
+IDC Turbo Mode=Start &brand; silently when I start my computer to make new
browsing sessions begin faster.
It's important to identify that this is enabling *preloading*. You may want to
deselect this option by default if the target machine has less than 128Mb RAM...
resetting subject for prefs side of things, installer is covered in another bug
Summary: Need turbo mode setting in installer and browser prefs → Need turbo mode setting in browser prefs
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
Shouldn't the 'Component' field be updated?
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
besides the removal of a localization comment:
-<!--LOCALIZATION NOTE (enbJavaCheck.label): 'Java' should never be translated
-->
from:
/cvsroot/mozilla/xpfe/components/prefwindow/resources/locale/en-US/pref-advanced
.dtd
other than that, r=ssu
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 83882 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14•23 years ago
|
||
1) I didn't understand what was going on with CreateALink. Could you tell me
more about what that's supposed to be doing?
2) Do we really need to link with OLE to make this work? I guess that
CreateALink method makes it a requirement.
3) For some reason I thought we were past the localization freeze. Is adding
these strings going to cause them a problem? We may need to get an OK from a
localization person.
4) Did you have a chance to have a UI person (german or jennifer) help you out
with where we are adding the turbo functionality. Seems like you have it in a
good spot to me but I don't believe in engineers (i.e. myself) dictating UI
policy =).
The rest of the code looks good to me.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
sr=mscott, a=asa
Comment 16•23 years ago
|
||
Anyone able to attach a screenshot of this UI change? I can see three problems
from reading the patch itself.
(1) The checkbox is in the wrong panel -- it should be in the `System' panel,
along with the other Windows-specific OS-related prefs.
(2) The word `enable' is introduced twice, which (a) sounds like an order rather
than an option, and (b) is tautological with the fact that you're using a
checkbox. (Yes I know that mistake exists in other places in the panel, but
precedent is no exuse.)
(3) An entire groupbox is used to surround only one control (the checkbox), making
the UI look incomplete.
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•23 years ago
|
||
rewording was done before I landed. and I consulted documentation people inside
of netscape for assistance.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 18•23 years ago
|
||
Matthew: I think you should open new bugs based on your comments.
Comment 19•23 years ago
|
||
re: #3 in mpt's comments, ugh. It's definitely far from pretty, but we do it
all over the place (Software Installation, Colors > View Source Window, Smart
Browsing, etc.). I know, precedent isn't justification, but I think there needs
to be a larger-scale effort to clean up these singular "groups".
Verifying fixed, though, since the UI's there. But I think we need new bugs
opened on what Matt mentioned.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 20•23 years ago
|
||
Could someone please file a bug for me, with a screenshot attached? I can't see
this UI, so I don't know what else needs fixing. Thanks.
Comment 21•23 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•23 years ago
|
||
Please open a new bug for your UI issues, assign to someone else, and discuss
there. And don't CC me -- I worked with enough people on getting this right to
begin with. I'm learning *everyone* is a UI expert, I have a feeling whatever we
do, it will never make anyone happy, and I've got other, more important stuff to
look at.
Thanks :-)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•