Closed Bug 853452 Opened 9 years ago Closed 8 years ago
Add devices to a Signature Summary matview
At least for those products that report devices (right now, FennecAndroid, B2G, WebappRuntimMobile), we should add a list of affected devices to the Signature Summary. We already added reporting on devices to report/list in bug 777372, so that explains where to get this information from, bug 847939 might make it easier to get to that data now, but I guess some aggregation work needs to be done here as well.
For Signature X - which devices and what percentage per device See: https://github.com/mozilla/socorro/pull/748/files for target data For FennecAndroid, B2G, WebappRuntimMobile: Table should have: 'Signature', 'Android_CPU_ABI', 'Android_Manufacturer', 'Android_Model', 'Android_Version', count
For reference for the week of 8/5/2013, we had about 9300 unique devices.
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/mozilla/socorro https://github.com/mozilla/socorro/commit/f8dd6ed2c96d8cf576c608f3131b920e81eb5794 Fixes bug 853452 Adds signature summary for Android Devices * Added a signature_summary_devices to signature_summary update function * Adding crontabber support for android_device table * Added migration to add new tables https://github.com/mozilla/socorro/commit/16a97bc79c1fb1df34aebaa73180ddb7c6283346 Merge pull request #1441 from selenamarie/bug853452-devices-sigsum Fixes bug 853452 Adds signature summary for Android Devices
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Adding needsinfo? - is the ui in place to expose this data or am I simply overlooking it? I'm looking in the #summary section, is this the correct? Example: https://crash-stats.allizom.org/report/list?product=FennecAndroid&range_value=7&range_unit=days&date=2013-08-26&signature=JSScript%3A%3AfullyInitFromEmitter%28js%3A%3AExclusiveContext*%2C+JS%3A%3AHandle%3CJSScript*%3E%2C+js%3A%3Afrontend%3A%3ABytecodeEmitter*%29&version=FennecAndroid%3A26.0a1 https://crash-stats.allizom.org/report/list?product=B2G&range_value=7&range_unit=days&date=2013-08-26&signature=mozalloc_abort%28char+const*%29+|+abort+|+js%3A%3Aion%3A%3AIonCode%3A%3Atrace%28JSTracer*%29&version=B2G%3A25.0a1
No UI yet! Sorry -- Brandon is working on the UI separately.
Summary: Add devices to Signature Summary → Add devices to a Signature Summary matview
(In reply to Selena Deckelmann :selenamarie :selena from comment #5) > No UI yet! Sorry -- Brandon is working on the UI separately. Excellent! I eagerly await our army of dataz. Bumping to [qa-]
I should have filed a separate bug for selena; my bad. Reopening until the UI is complete and dropping the qa- flag, since we will need QA on the new UI.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
We need to open a separate bug because this change needs to ship before the UI ships.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago → 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.