Closed Bug 854339 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

Stretching the "equal sign"

Categories

(Core :: MathML, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla24

People

(Reporter: fredw, Assigned: fredw)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: dev-doc-complete)

Attachments

(1 file, 2 obsolete files)

Attached file testcase (obsolete) —
Using stretchy equal sign is used to implement the AMScd extension by LaTeXML and MathJax. I attach a testcase produced by MathJax. The idea would be to add a direction:horizontal to the equal sign here: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/mathml/mathfont.properties#114 and to add a construction for the equal sign (for example by repeating U+2550 BOX DRAWINGS DOUBLE HORIZONTAL, which is in STIX fonts) in the Unicode table: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/mathml/mathfontUnicode.properties Here is a minimal testcase <math> <mn>2</mn> <munder> <mi>BASE</mi> <mo stretchy="true">=</mo> </munder> </math> The "2" is to workaround bug 687807. Someone willing to work on this could also have a look at bug 687807 comment 4. Then I guess that should be enough to make the attached testcase render correctly.
I have read the above description, and I am interested in working on it.
(In reply to rushikesh from comment #1) > I have read the above description, and I am interested in working on it. Thanks, I guess you already read https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Introduction but if you need more information, do not hesitate to ask. Regarding the syntax to use for mathfontUnicode see http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/mathml/mathfont.properties#1211 Here, I think you could just do as for the double vertical line: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/mathml/mathfontUnicode.properties#27 that is only use U+2550 for both the "glue" and "size0" character.
Assignee: nobody → rushikesh90
(In reply to Frédéric Wang (:fredw) from comment #0) > The "2" is to workaround bug 687807. Someone willing to work on this could > also have a look at bug 687807 comment 4. Then I guess that should be enough > to make the attached testcase render correctly. I've uploaded a patch on bug 687807. With that new patch, a minimal test case for the present bug becomes: <math> <munder> <mi>BASE</mi> <mo stretchy="true">=</mo> </munder> </math>
Hi, I am still working ..I will need if any help is required
Rushikesh, could you confirm that you're still working on this?
Flags: needinfo?(rushikesh90)
Yes..but I am still finding it hard to get to the root of problem.. can you give me some hint?
Flags: needinfo?(rushikesh90)
Really the most difficult part is to understand the whole process to compile, create a patch, submit it etc: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Introduction You will probably find someone on IRC #introduction to help you. Have you been able to build the source? I also recommend to install the math fonts: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla_MathML_Project/Fonts/Test Then regarding the bug itself, consider <math> <munder> <mi>AVERYLONGBASE</mi> <mo stretchy="true">&#x2194;</mo> </munder> </math> you should see that the arrow stretches to cover AVERYLONGBASE. The construction is described at this line: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/mathml/mathfontUnicode.properties#33 \u2194 = \u2190\uFFFD\u2192\u23AF\u2194\u27F7 where each \u**** is a Unicode code point that can be understood that way (from left to right): 1) \u2194: the character we want to stretch, "LEFT RIGHT ARROW U+2194" 2) The construction is described by various characters that we will put together to form the stretchy arrow: \u2190: the left piece "LEFTWARDS ARROW U+2190" \uFFFD: the middle piece. The character "REPLACEMENT CHARACTER U+FFFD" means that we don't actually use a middle piece (as opposed to e.g. horizontal braces) \u2192: the right piece "RIGHTWARDS ARROW U+2192" \u23AF: the glue "HORIZONTAL LINE EXTENSION U+23AF" that is we repeat several horizontal line characters between the left and right pieces. 3) Alternatively, for small sizes we can use a single character: \u2194: the smallest size "LEFT RIGHT ARROW U+2194" \u27F7: a larger size "LONG LEFT RIGHT ARROW U+27F7" Now, try instead with <math> <munder> <mi>AVERYLONGBASE</mi> <mo stretchy="true">=</mo> </munder> </math> At the moment, the equal sign does not stretch and this is the bug we want to fix. You need to modify http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/mathml/mathfontUnicode.properties to add a construction for the equal sign. Since its code point is EQUALS SIGN U+003D, that would be a new line \003D = ... I suggest considering U+2550 BOX DRAWINGS DOUBLE HORIZONTAL ═ for the pieces. Hope that helps.
Depends on: 687807
Rushikesh, have you been able to build the source code since the last time? Have you tried asking help on #introduction?
Flags: needinfo?(rushikesh90)
Assignee: rushikesh90 → fred.wang
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(rushikesh90)
Keywords: helpwanted
Whiteboard: [mentor=fredw][good first bug]
Attached patch Patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=89f9371c0b90 The test case from AMScd does not work because of other missing features / bugs with our stretchy support.
Attachment #728897 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #756457 - Flags: review?(karlt)
Comment on attachment 756457 [details] [diff] [review] Patch >+\u003D = \uFFFD\uFFFD\uFFFD\u2550\u003D # = equal sign Could we use U+003D EQUALS SIGN instead of U+2550 BOX DRAWINGS DOUBLE HORIZONTAL for the repeated glyph here? That should stretch fine I expect? And it would be more consistent with the unstretched glyph.
Attachment #756457 - Flags: review?(karlt) → review+
Attached patch Patch V2Splinter Review
Yes, that seems to work too.
Attachment #756457 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla24
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: