Closed
Bug 863290
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
crash in webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices
Categories
(Core :: WebRTC: Audio/Video, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla24
People
(Reporter: scoobidiver, Assigned: gcp)
References
Details
(Keywords: crash, Whiteboard: [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum-][qa-])
Crash Data
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
11.64 KB,
patch
|
jesup
:
review+
lsblakk
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
There's one crash in 23.0a1/20130417.
Signature webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices() More Reports Search
UUID a7ae40c2-684e-40d8-b5a9-56db92130418
Date Processed 2013-04-18 09:41:09
Uptime 156
Install Age 21.2 hours since version was first installed.
Install Time 2013-04-17 12:26:28
Product FennecAndroid
Version 23.0a1
Build ID 20130417031053
Release Channel nightly
OS Android
OS Version 0.0.0 Linux 3.0.31-742798 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Dec 22 17:04:04 KST 2012 armv7l samsung/m0xx/m0:4.1.2/JZO54K/I9300XXELLA:user/release-keys
Build Architecture arm
Build Architecture Info
Crash Reason SIGSEGV
Crash Address 0x2c
App Notes
AdapterDescription: 'ARM -- Mali-400 MP -- OpenGL ES 2.0 -- Model: GT-I9300, Product: m0xx, Manufacturer: samsung, Hardware: smdk4x12'
GL Layers! EGL? EGL+ GL Context? GL Context+ GL Layers+ WebGL? WebGL+ Stagefright? Stagefright+
samsung GT-I9300
samsung/m0xx/m0:4.1.2/JZO54K/I9300XXELLA:user/release-keys
Processor Notes sp-processor05.phx1.mozilla.com_15317:2012; exploitability tool failed: 127
EMCheckCompatibility True
Adapter Vendor ID ARM
Adapter Device ID Mali-400 MP
Device samsung GT-I9300
Android API Version 16 (REL)
Android CPU ABI armeabi-v7a
Frame Module Signature Source
0 libdvm.so libdvm.so@0x4c948
1 libdvm.so libdvm.so@0x4c92b
2 libxul.so webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices jni.h:605
3 libxul.so webrtc::ViEInputManager::CreateCaptureDevice vie_input_manager.cc:195
4 binder binder@0x2a
5 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x1b6f9
6 binder binder@0x26
7 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x1b6f9
8 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x15269
9 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x19c27
10 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x19c4b
11 binder binder@0x26
12 binder binder@0x26
13 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x19c91
14 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x171a3
15 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x16aaf
16 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x19f03
17 binder binder@0x26
18 binder binder@0x26
19 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x17305
20 libbinder.so libbinder.so@0x19dfd
21 libcamera_client.so libcamera_client.so@0x25a62
22 libc.so libc.so@0x1c6a3
23 libc.so libc.so@0x1c6a3
24 libc.so libc.so@0x1c655
25 libxul.so webrtc::CriticalSectionScoped::~CriticalSectionScoped critical_section_wrapper.h:52
26 libxul.so webrtc::TraceImpl::AddMessageToList trace_impl.cc:463
27 libxul.so webrtc::EventPosix::Wait event_posix.cc:157
28 libxul.so webrtc::EventPosix::Set event_posix.cc:106
29 libxul.so webrtc::TraceImpl::AddImpl trace_impl.cc:613
30 dalvik-heap (deleted) dalvik-heap @0x256403f
31 dalvik-heap (deleted) dalvik-heap @0x356461e
32 dalvik-heap (deleted) dalvik-heap @0x2d2b35
33 libxul.so libxul.so@0x6e4c6a
34 dalvik-heap (deleted) dalvik-heap @0x272645f
35 org.mozilla.fennec-2.apk org.mozilla.fennec-2.apk@0x125756f
36 dalvik-mark-stack (deleted) dalvik-mark-stack @0x2ca0467
37 org.mozilla.fennec-2.apk org.mozilla.fennec-2.apk@0x1567961
38 libc.so libc.so@0x1ee75
39 libxul.so webrtc::CriticalSectionPosix::Leave critical_section_posix.cc:39
40 libxul.so webrtc::CriticalSectionScoped::~CriticalSectionScoped critical_section_wrapper.h:52
41 libxul.so webrtc::TraceImpl::StaticInstance static_instance.h:148
42 libxul.so webrtc::Trace::Add trace_impl.cc:754
43 OMXCodec (deleted) OMXCodec @0x2ee92e
44 OMXCodec (deleted) OMXCodec @0x9b2c3f
45 dalvik-heap (deleted) dalvik-heap @0x3726273
46 libxul.so nsXBLWindowKeyHandler::WalkHandlersAndExecute nsXBLWindowKeyHandler.cpp:489
47 OMXCodec (deleted) OMXCodec @0x52863
48 dalvik-mark-stack (deleted) dalvik-mark-stack @0x3d9095d
49 OMXCodec (deleted) OMXCodec @0x11431e
50 dalvik-heap (deleted) dalvik-heap @0x52d1c2f
51 libxul.so webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoImpl::GetCapability rw_lock_wrapper.h:43
52 libxul.so webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoImpl::GetBestMatchedCapability device_info_impl.cc:311
53 libxul.so webrtc::ViEInputManager::GetCaptureCapability vie_input_manager.cc:111
54 libxul.so webrtc::ViECaptureImpl::GetCaptureCapability vie_capture_impl.cc:472
55 libxul.so webrtc::ViECaptureImpl::ShowCaptureSettingsDialogBox vie_capture_impl.cc:503
56 libxul.so mozilla::MediaEngineWebRTCVideoSource::ChooseCapability MediaEngineWebRTCVideo.cpp:177
57 libxul.so webrtc::ViECaptureImpl::AllocateCaptureDevice vie_capture_impl.cc:121
58 libxul.so webrtc::ViECaptureImpl::AllocateExternalCaptureDevice vie_capture_impl.cc:150
59 libxul.so mozilla::MediaEngineWebRTCVideoSource::Allocate MediaEngineWebRTCVideo.cpp:226
60 libxul.so mozilla::MediaEngineWebRTCVideoSource::ChooseCapability MediaEngineWebRTCVideo.cpp:200
61 libxul.so mozilla::GetUserMediaRunnable::ProcessGetUserMedia dom/media/MediaManager.cpp:697
62 libc.so libc.so@0x12e52
63 libnss3.so PR_Unlock nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptsynch.c:205
64 libxul.so mozilla::GetUserMediaRunnable::Run dom/media/MediaManager.cpp:558
65 libnss3.so PR_ExitMonitor nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptsynch.c:557
66 libxul.so nsEventQueue::GetEvent ReentrantMonitor.h:80
67 libxul.so nsThread::ProcessNextEvent nsThread.cpp:627
68 libxul.so NS_ProcessNextEvent nsThreadUtils.cpp:238
69 libxul.so nsThread::ThreadFunc nsThread.cpp:265
70 libnss3.so pt_AttachThread nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:276
71 libnss3.so _pt_root nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:191
72 libnss3.so pt_AttachThread nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:276
73 libc.so libc.so@0x12e02
74 libc.so libc.so@0x1255a
More reports at:
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?signature=webrtc%3A%3Avideocapturemodule%3A%3ADeviceInfoAndroid%3A%3ANumberOfDevices%28%29
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
gcp - any ideas?
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Defensively blocking for gUM, but if we can't do anything here with the given stack or URLs after getting them, feel free to renom.
Whiteboard: [native-crash] → [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum+]
There's no URLs provided from this.
My guess is that it may have to do with showing the capture settings and having more than 1 camera. (front and back) I think I would have to play around with webrtc on android and understand how webrtc works a little better to figure out how to reproduce the crash.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
This is going to be hard to debug with STR. Seems to imply failure to set up capture_device_info_ with CreateDeviceInfo.
Flags: needinfo?(gpascutto)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Hard to debug without, of course.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Keywords: steps-wanted
QA Contact: jsmith
Whiteboard: [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum+] → [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum-]
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum-] → [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum-][blocking-gum-]
Do we have a Galaxy S III somewhere?
Samsung Galaxy S III : GT-I9300
ICS : 4.1.2
on Firefox 23a1
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
I have one...
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
If I had to guess on STR potentially here, I doubt it's a complex STR causing this. We just turned this feature on by default, so if we know the device, I'd say a good way nail down the STR here is go to http://mozilla.github.io/webrtc-landing/gum_test.html and exploratory test the video, audio, video&audio functionality. That might end up revealing the crash.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
I developed the feature on a Nexus 4 and Galaxy S3 using (among others) those pages, so really I do would like to know if there's reliable STR. Maybe it's something simple as order of operations being different from what I tend to do or whatever.
I don't have the device, so I wouldn't be able to find the STRs as easily.
My guess would be to try to connect to someone at the same time looking at the settings and changing the capture capability... or something of the nature?
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Naoki Hirata :nhirata (please use needinfo instead of cc) from comment #10)
> I don't have the device, so I wouldn't be able to find the STRs as easily.
>
> My guess would be to try to connect to someone at the same time looking at
> the settings and changing the capture capability... or something of the
> nature?
The stack's reference to "number of devices" usually happens as part of the camera capture process for device setup during the perms management flow. So I actually think some testing on a S3 with video or video&audio might be worthwhile.
Thanks, Jason. As stated before, I would need the device to test; I'm not sure speculating will lead to any sort of result GCP could use. I was looking at the bottom of the stack as well as the top to see how things lead to that point.
There's some other scenarioes I would test beyond set up or settings.
Ie what if another app was still using the camera in the background while the WEBRTC was setting up or being configured? Is there any other ways of switching the cameras in using front or the back one, etc. etc.
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
I can't reproduce the crash on a S3 by testing some of the gUM & WebRTC test apps.
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Crash Signature: [@ webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices()] → [@ webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices()]
[@ _JNIEnv::CallIntMethod(_jobject*, _jmethodID*, ...) | webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices() ]
Keywords: needURLs
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@ webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices()]
[@ _JNIEnv::CallIntMethod(_jobject*, _jmethodID*, ...) | webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices() ] → [@ webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices()]
[@ _JNIEnv::CallIntMethod(_jobject*, _jmethodID*, ...) | webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices()]
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
We currently set up the Android objects in EnumerateVideoDevices, but there is some evidence we can be setting up things without passing through there, see for example https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866093#c1
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
Okay, jesup confirmed that also for video it's perfectly possible to start without going through EnumerateVideoDevices. The current code assumes that those functions are called first and will do the SetAndroidObjects call.
This would be consistent with this crash signature, so fingers crossed. Jesup, do you know STR to reproduce this situation?
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
Got this while running under the debugger, yay:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
Loading libraries and symbols...
[Switching to Thread 14070]
0x408ba6da in ?? () from /home/morbo/jimdb/moz-gdb/lib/00658c727e962a43/system/lib/libdvm.so
(gdb) bt
#0 0x408ba6da in ?? () from /home/morbo/jimdb/moz-gdb/lib/00658c727e962a43/system/lib/libdvm.so
#1 0x7bbff3ca in _JNIEnv::CallIntMethod (this=<optimized out>, obj=<optimized out>, methodID=0x6d14e118)
at /home/morbo/android-ndk-r8c/platforms/android-9/arch-arm/usr/include/jni.h:637
#2 0x7cafcaa4 in webrtc::videocapturemodule::DeviceInfoAndroid::NumberOfDevices (this=0x771fe0a0)
at /home/morbo/hg/mozilla-central/media/webrtc/trunk/webrtc/modules/video_capture/android/device_info_android.cc:72
#3 0x7cb59128 in webrtc::ViEInputManager::NumberOfCaptureDevices (this=0x7712a040)
at /home/morbo/hg/mozilla-central/media/webrtc/trunk/webrtc/video_engine/vie_input_manager.cc:75
#4 0x7cb3f516 in webrtc::ViECaptureImpl::NumberOfCaptureDevices (this=0x77c752c0)
at /home/morbo/hg/mozilla-central/media/webrtc/trunk/webrtc/video_engine/vie_capture_impl.cc:80
#5 0x7b860d06 in mozilla::MediaEngineWebRTC::EnumerateVideoDevices (this=0x7f13e340, aVSources=0x824ffda4)
at /home/morbo/hg/mozilla-central/content/media/webrtc/MediaEngineWebRTC.cpp:110
#6 0x7b9ffc5a in mozilla::GetUserMediaRunnable::SelectDevice (this=0x7f3f38d0)
at /home/morbo/hg/mozilla-central/dom/media/MediaManager.cpp:613
#7 0x7ba03eae in mozilla::GetUserMediaRunnable::Run (this=0x7f3f38d0)
at /home/morbo/hg/mozilla-central/dom/media/MediaManager.cpp:537
#8 0x7c654d7c in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x7f1cee40, mayWait=<optimized out>, result=0x824ffe87)
at /home/morbo/hg/mozilla-central/xpcom/threads/nsThread.cpp:627
#9 0x7c604076 in NS_ProcessNextEvent (thread=<optimized out>, mayWait=<optimized out>)
at /home/morbo/hg/mozilla-central/objdir-android/xpcom/build/nsThreadUtils.cpp:238
#10 0x7c6542d2 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=0x7f1cee40) at /home/morbo/hg/mozilla-central/xpcom/threads/nsThread.cpp:265
#11 0x773fbdf4 in _pt_root (arg=0x7851c600) at /home/morbo/hg/mozilla-central/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:204
#12 0x402743dc in __thread_entry () from /home/morbo/jimdb/moz-gdb/lib/00658c727e962a43/system/lib/libc.so
#13 0x40273ac8 in pthread_create () from /home/morbo/jimdb/moz-gdb/lib/00658c727e962a43/system/lib/libc.so
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•12 years ago
|
||
EnumerateVideoDevices is in that stack, so bug 866093 probably won't solve this.
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•12 years ago
|
||
D/*WEBRTCN*(16302): SetAndroidObjects: Registered native functions
D/*WEBRTCN*(16302): VideoCaptureDeviceInfoAndroid get method id
D/*WEBRTCN*(16302): SetAndroidObjects: construct static java device object
D/WEBRTC (16302): VideoCaptureDeviceInfoAndroid
D/WEBRTC (16302): Camera 0, Facing back, Orientation 90
...
E/mm-camera( 191): mctl_open_and_init_comps: mctl_open_comps failed, rc = -1
E/mm-libcamera2(11271): mm_camera_util_private_s_ctrl: fd=31, S_CTRL, id=0x800000d, value = 0x42be3950, rc = -1
E/QCameraHWI_Parm(11271): native_set_parms failed: type 3 length 424 error Connection timed out
E/QCameraHWI_Parm(11271): MM_CAMERA_PARM_DIMENSION Failed.
..
E/WEBRTC (16302): Failed to init VideoCaptureDeviceInfo exnull
D/WEBRTC (16302): Failed to create VideoCaptureDeviceInfoAndroid.
D/*WEBRTCN*(16302): SetAndroidObjects: could not create Java Capture Device info object
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•12 years ago
|
||
Okay, I got the cause: this happens if the camera in the device gets stuck for whatever reason and we fail to open it.
We generate an exception around:
https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/media/webrtc/trunk/webrtc/modules/video_capture/android/java/org/webrtc/videoengine/VideoCaptureDeviceInfoAndroid.java#114
And the calling code doesn't deal very well with the missing camera.
This is probably why it's hard to reproduce; I don't know any good way to get the Android Camera stuck. It happened just once on this Nexus 4 and this bug was 100% reproducible then. After rebooting, it's not reproducible at all.
Also note the Android camera errors in the logcat above?
Comment 22•12 years ago
|
||
Sounds like STR is going to be hard to get here then. I'll pull the keyword, but based on what I'm seeing above, you've got an idea on some of the problems underlying this crash, so we might be okay.
Keywords: steps-wanted
Comment 23•12 years ago
|
||
Bouncing back up to a blocker now that momentum is possible.
Whiteboard: [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum-][blocking-gum-] → [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum+][blocking-gum-]
Updated•12 years ago
|
Blocks: android-webrtc
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•12 years ago
|
||
Add error handling for SetObjects failure. After fixing that we still crash because VideoConduit doesn't null it's pointers on construction, but does check them for nullness in the destructor. Fixed that too.
Attachment #746314 -
Flags: review?(rjesup)
Comment 25•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 746314 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch 1. Detect SetObjects failure. Initialize objects.
Review of attachment 746314 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: media/webrtc/signaling/src/media-conduit/VideoConduit.h
@@ +159,5 @@
> + mPtrViECodec(NULL),
> + mPtrViENetwork(NULL),
> + mPtrViERender(NULL),
> + mPtrExtCapture(NULL),
> + mPtrRTP(NULL)
nullptr please for all of these (and the other ones right above).
Attachment #746314 -
Flags: review?(rjesup) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•12 years ago
|
||
Backed it out, for some reason it's causing Android 4.0 (but not 2.2) orange.
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/e698d3534b96
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•12 years ago
|
||
05-07 23:32:49.765 E/WEBRTC ( 2197): Failed to init VideoCaptureDeviceInfo exnull
05-07 23:32:49.765 W/CameraService( 1294): CameraService::connect X (pid 2197) rejected (existing client).
05-07 23:32:49.773 E/WEBRTC ( 2197): Failed to init VideoCaptureDeviceInfo exFail to connect to camera service
We fail to open the camera, subsequent opens continue to fail because we are already holding the lock.
The tests pass on my local devices.
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•12 years ago
|
||
More logging, getting the available frame rates fails:
05-14 11:26:34.718 D/WEBRTC ( 2205): VideoCaptureDeviceInfoAndroid
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 413: camera_get_camera_info() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): cameraHal BACK 0
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): cameraHal 0
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/WEBRTC ( 2205): Camera 0, Facing back, Orientation 0
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/WEBRTC ( 2205): Opening Camera 0
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 413: camera_get_camera_info() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): cameraHal BACK 0
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): cameraHal 0
05-14 11:26:34.726 I/CameraService( 1293): Opening camera 0
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 314: camera_device_open() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.726 I/****CameraHAL( 1293): camera_device open
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/CameraHardware( 1293): PREVIEW SIZE: w=320 h=240 framerate=30
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 120: camera_set_callbacks() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.726 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 128: camera_enable_msg_type() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.726 I/AwesomePlayer( 1293): setDataSource_l('/system/media/audio/ui/camera_click.ogg')
05-14 11:26:34.750 I/AwesomePlayer( 1293): setDataSource_l('/system/media/audio/ui/VideoRecord.ogg')
05-14 11:26:34.757 D/WEBRTC ( 2205): Getting Camera 0 parameters
05-14 11:26:34.757 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): focus-mode=0;picture-format=jpeg;picture-size=320x240;picture-size-values=320x240;preview-format=yuv422sp;preview-fps-range-values=(8000,8000),(8000,10000),(10000,10000),(8000,15000),(15000,15000),(8000,20000),(20000,20000),(24000,24000),(25000,25000),(8000,30000),(30000,30000);preview-frame-rate=30;preview-size=320x240;preview-size-values=320x240,352x288,640x480,720x480,720x576,848x480;video-frame-format=yuv420sp
05-14 11:26:34.757 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 249: camera_get_parameters() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.757 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 255: camera_put_parameters() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.757 D/CameraHardware( 1293): PREVIEW SIZE: w=320 h=240 framerate=30
05-14 11:26:34.765 D/WEBRTC ( 2205): Getting Camera 0 resolutions & framerates
05-14 11:26:34.765 E/WEBRTC ( 2205): Failed to init VideoCaptureDeviceInfo exception: null
05-14 11:26:34.765 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 135: camera_disable_msg_type() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.765 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 135: camera_disable_msg_type() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.765 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 154: camera_stop_preview() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.765 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 226: camera_cancel_picture() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.765 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 272: camera_release() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.765 I/CameraService( 1293): Destroying camera 0
05-14 11:26:34.765 D/****CameraHAL( 1293): 289: camera_device_close() ENTER
05-14 11:26:34.765 D/WEBRTC ( 2205): Failed to create VideoCaptureDeviceInfoAndroid.
05-14 11:26:34.765 D/WEBRTC ( 2205): VideoCaptureDeviceInfoAndroid
Assignee | ||
Comment 30•12 years ago
|
||
Improved version of previous patch:
1) Don't try to use the Java Env if attaching to it fails. (Didn't see any crashers with this, but it's an obvious bug.
2) The Android 4.0 test boards will fail getSupportedPreviewFrameRates(). This is allowed by the Android API but the code didn't handle it.
3) Android 2.2 wouldn't report any cameras back. Added some simple code to handle it.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #749869 -
Attachment is patch: true
Attachment #749869 -
Flags: review?(rjesup)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #746314 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 31•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 749869 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch 1. v2 Detect SetObjects failure. Initialize objects.
Review of attachment 749869 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
r+
Please also submit an issue on webrtc.org and a patch to reitveld and put links in a comment here.
Attachment #749869 -
Flags: review?(rjesup) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 32•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•12 years ago
|
||
https://code.google.com/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=1780
Hmm, my patches will have slight differences due to our changes in these files, and I won't be able to test anything I rebase. I linked the issues to the patches here, if anyone at webrtc.org cares they can pick them up.
Assignee | ||
Comment 34•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 35•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → gpascutto
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla24
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum+][blocking-gum-] → [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum+][blocking-gum-][qa-]
Reporter | ||
Comment 36•12 years ago
|
||
It's not fixed. See the link in comment 0.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 37•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 749869 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch 1. v2 Detect SetObjects failure. Initialize objects.
[Approval Request Comment]
Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): Bug 750010 and friends
User impact if declined: Crashes when trying to use WebRTC
Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): Landed on m-c a few days ago. Doesn't solve all crashes but fixes reall bugs.
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): Don't care about WebRTC stability for 23. Little risk, change in preffed-off feature.
Attachment #749869 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Updated•11 years ago
|
status-firefox24:
--- → affected
Comment 38•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 749869 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch 1. v2 Detect SetObjects failure. Initialize objects.
Approving for uplift to increase webrtc stability.
Attachment #749869 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
Assignee | ||
Comment 39•11 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 40•11 years ago
|
||
A comment in French (post-patch) says: "I was using WebRTC, switched to the Android desktop then launched again WebRTC"
Assignee | ||
Comment 41•11 years ago
|
||
That sounds like bug 874546 expect it wouldn't produce this backtrace at all.
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum+][blocking-gum-][qa-] → [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum+]
Comment 42•11 years ago
|
||
One interesting comment came in:
I was using two websites that tried to access getUserMedia - not at the same time. one (the one that crashed) was still displaying the prompt for sharing when I came back from testing the other one. I pressed share and it crashed. let me know if you need more info!
Maybe this has to do with multiple tabs using getUserMedia? Let's do qawanted on that.
Keywords: qawanted
Comment 43•11 years ago
|
||
We're crashing enough here even nightly that I'm concerned that as we go up to higher branches, the rate of crashes here will spike. We shouldn't lose this on our radar - we need to narrow this down to find out what's crashing us here. comment 42 gives a clue.
tracking-fennec: --- → ?
Comment 44•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jason Smith [:jsmith] from comment #43)
> We're crashing enough here even nightly that I'm concerned that as we go up
> to higher branches, the rate of crashes here will spike. We shouldn't lose
> this on our radar - we need to narrow this down to find out what's crashing
> us here. comment 42 gives a clue.
Wasn't able to find anything sadly. I did hit the other crash in bug 880437, however.
tracking-fennec: ? → ---
Keywords: qawanted
Comment 45•11 years ago
|
||
Can't block until we have something actionable here.
Whiteboard: [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum+] → [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum-]
Reporter | ||
Comment 46•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Gian-Carlo Pascutto (:gcp) from comment #41)
> That sounds like bug 874546 expect it wouldn't produce this backtrace at all.
Currently no crashes since 24.0a1/20130606 when the patch of bug 874546 landed.
Depends on: 874546
Comment 47•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Scoobidiver from comment #46)
> (In reply to Gian-Carlo Pascutto (:gcp) from comment #41)
> > That sounds like bug 874546 expect it wouldn't produce this backtrace at all.
> Currently no crashes since 24.0a1/20130606 when the patch of bug 874546
> landed.
I'm going to close this for now since bug 874546 fixed this and we haven't seen crashes over a few days. If we end up seeing these crashes again, reopen the bug.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum-] → [native-crash][getUserMedia][android-gum-][qa-]
Comment 48•11 years ago
|
||
We're only preffing on Fx24, not 23. So I'm marking 23 as disabled.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•