870540 - [meta] Enable us to use the second number in the Firefox version

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Firefox :: General, defect)

Description

[Alex Keybl [:akeybl]]

We'd like to use the second number in the ESR (and mainline Firefox) version number for planned security releases of a single Gecko version.

Comment 1

[Alex Keybl [:akeybl]]

Can't remember why I tracked this for 23. Still tracking for 24 though, to prepare for a 24.1.

Comment 2

[bhavana bajaj [:bajaj]]

:bhearsum, the dependencies look resolved, anything else needed for this to work which may not be on this bug?

Comment 3

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

(In reply to bhavana bajaj [:bajaj] from comment #2)
> :bhearsum, the dependencies look resolved, anything else needed for this to
> work which may not be on this bug?

Nope, should be fine. Sorry for missing this question - somehow I wasn't cc'ed or anything.

Comment 4

[Florian Bender]

… and RESO-FIX the bug?

Comment 5

[u279076]

I don't see anything specific needing QA verification here. Please replace the [qa-] whiteboard tag with the verifyme keyword if there's something needed from us here.

Comment 6

[Kohei Yoshino]

Bug 870868 froze the second number of the UA Gecko version at zero:

(Bug 870868 Comment 0)
> Please freeze the second number of the UA Gecko version at zero. So for
> instance Firefox 24.1 would show up as Firefox 24.0 in the UA.

This bug says "enable us to *use* the second number" but it actually won't affect site/add-on compatibility, right?

Comment 7

[Alex Keybl [:akeybl]]

(In reply to Kohei Yoshino [:kohei] from comment #6)
> Bug 870868 froze the second number of the UA Gecko version at zero:
> 
> (Bug 870868 Comment 0)
> > Please freeze the second number of the UA Gecko version at zero. So for
> > instance Firefox 24.1 would show up as Firefox 24.0 in the UA.
> 
> This bug says "enable us to *use* the second number" but it actually won't
> affect site/add-on compatibility, right?

Correct, because bug 870868 was resolved.

Comment 8

[Kohei Yoshino]

akeybl: thanks for your clarification. 

jorgev: you may want to update your add-on compat doc:
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2013/09/03/compatibility-for-firefox-24/

Comment 9

[Jorge Villalobos [:jorgev] (he/him)]

This was done some time ago. Thanks for the poke.