Closed
Bug 87476
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
Why have both nsContentDLF and nsLayoutDLF?
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
mozilla0.9.4
People
(Reporter: dbaron, Assigned: dbaron)
Details
Why do we have both nsContentDLF and nsLayoutDLF? This looks like a mistake in
the layout/content split, I think. It seems like we only use nsLayoutDLF.
(This is confusing for people who want to modify the code -- both have been
modified recently.)
Assignee | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P2
Summary: Why have both nsContentDLF and nsLayoutDLF → Why have both nsContentDLF and nsLayoutDLF?
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9.3
I did not analyze these two files that much in the split - I just made the
minimal change to get things working.
Before you go and remove one or both, please make sure that whatever you do you
still leave in the possibility of creating a "DOM Builder" component that could
be used on the server, for example, without layout.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
Changes made to nsContentDLF.cpp (unused) are:
C L
1.2 1.41
1.3 ----
1.4 1.42
1.5 1.46
1.6 1.48
1.7 1.49
1.8 1.51
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
The only revisions where the changes were different between the two were 1.3,
1.5, and 1.6, but I think there were some initial differences too.
Assignee | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.3 → mozilla0.9.4
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/xpfe/appshell/src/nsWebShellWindow.cpp#146
was confusing me about what we were using, but it's not used.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 71248 ***
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•