Closed Bug 87793 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

Need CRC checking and single connection dload for Mac

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Installer, defect)

Product:
SeaMonkey
Component:
Installer
Platform:
PowerPC
Mac System 8.5
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Status:
VERIFIED FIXED
Milestone:
mozilla0.9.3

People

(Reporter: slogan, Assigned: slogan)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: nsbranch+)

Attachments

(7 files)

patch to implement both problems
10.43 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
better patch, also fixes problem with pause/resume
20.49 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
patch to fix this
20.49 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
same diff as the last dif, but using -u50 for better perspective
78.07 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
only validate xpi, zip, and jar files
2.05 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
same patch as id=43920, but with -u20
5.53 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
deals with case comparisons
7.00 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review 
Patch is forthcoming
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Keywords: nsbeta1, nsBranch
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9.3

    
  
QA Contact: gemal → gbush

    
  
Keywords: nsbeta1 → nsbeta1+

    
    

    
  


  

    
    

    
  
r=ssu for patch 41481 and also for the next patch (if there is one) that fixes a 
minor URL display problem.

    
    

    
  
Minor URL display problem is also fixed, just needed to add a missing EraseRect 
on the XPI file short name before redrawing a new one.

syd

    
    

    
  
hey syd, can you please attach new diffs using -uw? Thanks. I can't read these
types of diffs. I'm not smart enough.

    
    

    
  
thanks sean!!

sr=mscott

    
  
Keywords: vtrunk

    
  
Whiteboard: nsbranch+

    
    

    
  
*** Bug 65674 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

    
    

    
  
This is the famous error 13 bug.

    
    

    
  


  

    
    

    
  
is there a strlwr() or strupr() (on the mac )to use instead of the for loop?  
I'm wondering if it might be faster than the for() loop

    
    

    
  
We're talking about 5 files and 3 characters = 15 assignments run once by a user 
once every 6 months. Doubt it matters much.

    
    

    
  
r=ssu for last patch (id=43972)

    
    

    
  
sr=mscott

    
    

    
  
a=asa

    
    

    
  
so, is this checked in? smoketester still oberserving this bug this morning.

    
    

    
  
syd's last patch has been checked in to the trunk at the request of leaf.  it 
was one of the last bugs blocking 0.9.3.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED

    
    

    
  
verified fixed on commercial build 2001-08-01-04-trunk
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Browser → Seamonkey

          You need to log in
          before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
        






  

    
  







  

    

      
Attachment

      

      
      
      
      
    

    

      

        

          

            
General

            

              Creator: 



            

            
Created: 

            
Updated: 

            
Size: