Closed Bug 880672 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Unprefix -moz-grab and -moz-grabbing

Categories

(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla27
Tracking Status
relnote-firefox --- 27+

People

(Reporter: hsivonen, Assigned: fryn)

References

(Blocks 2 open bugs)

Details

(Keywords: dev-doc-complete, site-compat)

Attachments

(1 file)

These CSS cursor keywords should be unprefixed (and upstreamed to the spec).
Frank -- didn't you talk with Tantek about this already? Or was that a different cursor?
(In reply to Justin Dolske [:Dolske] from comment #1)
> Frank -- didn't you talk with Tantek about this already? Or was that a
> different cursor?

I talked to Tantek about it several times, explaining that there have been two interoperable implementations for years (Gecko and WebKit) and he agreed that we should add them to the CSS3 UI spec, but he hasn't followed through on adding them to the spec.
Sorry, yes this is in my court to at least update the editor's draft accordingly:
http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-ui#issue-26
and get another CR/LC draft published by the CSSWG.
I did raise it to the WG on www-style, got no objections, one strong approval. I also raised it in a telcon (but can't find the minutes :( ) and I remember it being approved there too.
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86_64 → All
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Attached patch patchSplinter Review
Assignee: nobody → fyan
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #766563 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #766563 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Assignee: fryn → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Frank, do you still want review on this patch?  What's the status?
Flags: needinfo?(fryn)
Comment on attachment 766563 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

Review of attachment 766563 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

(In reply to Boris Zbarsky (:bz) from comment #5)
> Frank, do you still want review on this patch?  What's the status?

I do want review on this patch.

`grab` and `grabbing` have received approval from members of the CSS working group for inclusion in the CSS3 UI Module. It's simply not been entered into the editor's and working drafts yet, but there's no reason to keep waiting for that to happen.
Attachment #766563 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Flags: needinfo?(fryn)
Comment on attachment 766563 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

r=me, but needs sr from dbaron
Attachment #766563 - Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #766563 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #766563 - Flags: review+
So I don't actually see any record of a group decision here; all I see is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0056.html .  Tantek, did you want to raise this?
Flags: needinfo?(tantek)
After Tab's affirmative response to that email:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0058.html
I raised it in the subsequent telcon, and there was no objection. Unfortunately I can't find any sign of that in minutes.

It's in my queue to add to CSS3-UI editor's draft:

http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-ui#issue-26
Comment on attachment 766563 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

sr=dbaron
Attachment #766563 - Flags: superreview?(dbaron) → superreview+
Assignee: nobody → fryn
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8879393c2552
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla27
Keywords: site-compat
Depends on: 879119
Blocks: 924598
CSS3-UI editor's draft updated with 'grab' and 'grabbing': http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ui/
Flags: needinfo?(tantek)
Blocks: 879119
No longer depends on: 879119
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.