880672 - Unprefix -moz-grab and -moz-grabbing

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)

Description

[Henri Sivonen (:hsivonen)]

These CSS cursor keywords should be unprefixed (and upstreamed to the spec).

Comment 1

[Justin Dolske [:Dolske]]

Frank -- didn't you talk with Tantek about this already? Or was that a different cursor?

Comment 2

[Frank Yan (:fryn)]

(In reply to Justin Dolske [:Dolske] from comment #1)
> Frank -- didn't you talk with Tantek about this already? Or was that a
> different cursor?

I talked to Tantek about it several times, explaining that there have been two interoperable implementations for years (Gecko and WebKit) and he agreed that we should add them to the CSS3 UI spec, but he hasn't followed through on adding them to the spec.

Comment 3

[Tantek Çelik]

Sorry, yes this is in my court to at least update the editor's draft accordingly:
http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-ui#issue-26
and get another CR/LC draft published by the CSSWG.
I did raise it to the WG on www-style, got no objections, one strong approval. I also raised it in a telcon (but can't find the minutes :( ) and I remember it being approved there too.

Comment 4

[Frank Yan (:fryn)]

Attachment: patch

Comment 5

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

Frank, do you still want review on this patch?  What's the status?

Comment 6

[Frank Yan (:fryn)]

Comment on attachment 766563 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

Review of attachment 766563 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

(In reply to Boris Zbarsky (:bz) from comment #5)
> Frank, do you still want review on this patch?  What's the status?

I do want review on this patch.

`grab` and `grabbing` have received approval from members of the CSS working group for inclusion in the CSS3 UI Module. It's simply not been entered into the editor's and working drafts yet, but there's no reason to keep waiting for that to happen.

Comment 7

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

Comment on attachment 766563 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

r=me, but needs sr from dbaron

Comment 8

[David Baron :dbaron: (⌚️UTC-4, no longer working on Mozilla)]

So I don't actually see any record of a group decision here; all I see is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0056.html .  Tantek, did you want to raise this?

Comment 9

[Tantek Çelik]

After Tab's affirmative response to that email:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0058.html
I raised it in the subsequent telcon, and there was no objection. Unfortunately I can't find any sign of that in minutes.

It's in my queue to add to CSS3-UI editor's draft:

http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-ui#issue-26

Comment 10

[David Baron :dbaron: (⌚️UTC-4, no longer working on Mozilla)]

Ah, it's in the minutes here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0428.html

Comment 11

[David Baron :dbaron: (⌚️UTC-4, no longer working on Mozilla)]

Comment on attachment 766563 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

sr=dbaron

Comment 12

[David Baron :dbaron: (⌚️UTC-4, no longer working on Mozilla)]

https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/8879393c2552

Comment 13

[Wes Kocher (:KWierso) (Not reading bugmail; email directly if needed)]

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8879393c2552

Comment 14

[Florian Scholz (Open Web Docs)]

Notes have been added to:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/cursor
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox/Releases/27

Comment 15

[Kohei Yoshino]

Added https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox/Releases/27/Site_Compatibility

Comment 16

[Tantek Çelik]

CSS3-UI editor's draft updated with 'grab' and 'grabbing': http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ui/