883915 - "Protocol SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is not supported" on Android 2.2 devices

Status: RESOLVED INVALID

(Firefox Health Report Graveyard :: Client: Android, defect, P1)

Description

[Nick Alexander :nalexander [he/him]]

From twalker, on a 2.2 HTC device:


06-17 11:36:53.607: D/GeckoPreferences(658): Broadcast: org.mozilla.fennec.HEALTHREPORT_UPLOAD_PREF, android.not_a_preference.healthreport.uploadEnabled, GeckoApp, true
06-17 11:36:53.627: D/GeckoSetPrefs(658): Broadcast pref.
06-17 11:36:53.657: I/GeckoHealth(658): fennec :: HealthReportBroadcastService :: Registering health report start broadcast receiver.
06-17 11:36:53.657: I/GeckoHealth(658): fennec :: BackgroundService :: Setting inexact repeating alarm for interval 60000
06-17 11:36:53.718: I/GeckoHealth(658): fennec :: SubmissionPolicy :: Need to wait 120000 before first upload.
06-17 11:38:53.717: I/GeckoHealth(658): fennec :: GeckoHealthGen :: Generating FHR document from 1355935133716; last ping 1367500000000
06-17 11:38:53.717: I/GeckoHealth(658): fennec :: GeckoProfileInfo :: Restoring ProfileInformationCache from file.
06-17 11:38:59.047: W/GeckoHealth(658): fennec :: TLSSocketFactory :: Setting enabled cipher suites failed: Protocol SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is not supported.

This looks a lot like https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717691.

Comment 1

[Tracy Walker [:tracy]]

I do not see this on Android 3.1 on a Samsung Galaxy 10 tablet.

Comment 2

[Richard Newman [:rnewman]]

Tracy: did I see you mention on IRC that you couldn't reproduce this?

Comment 3

[Nick Alexander :nalexander [he/him]]

I should have updated: this message is printed by the BaseResource code catching a known exception and fixing it up.  Not sure what causes the later failure; presumably the cert issue in Bug 828654 itself.

Comment 4

[Richard Newman [:rnewman]]

So I guess that's INVALID!

See Bug 884008 for the cert issue.

Comment 5

[Tracy Walker [:tracy]]

See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828654#c32 and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=763685 for what I saw after going back to test the 2.2 device.