Closed Bug 886288 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

deploy new tsvgx and tscrollx talos tests to m-c only

Categories

(Release Engineering :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: jmaher, Unassigned)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

we are turning on additional tests as a staging run on m-c only. This will run in parallel with the other tests. Once we observe these tests we will be ready to transition to the new tests as needed.
Callek, I am not sure if the mobile stuff will work, but I took my best guess at it.
Attachment #766654 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Comment on attachment 766654 [details] [diff] [review] [diff] [review] new configs for tsvgx and tscrollx ---------AUTOMATIC COMMENT--------- -- filter pep8-callek-june-2013 -- ---------AUTOMATIC COMMENT--------- $pep8 <dir> --diff --max-line-length=159 --show-source < attachment.diff /tmp/tmp.zbaY9yF2nI/mozilla-tests/config.py:189:160: E501 line too long (169 > 159 characters) 'suites': GRAPH_CONFIG + ['--activeTests', 'tspaint_places_generated_med:tspaint_places_generated_max', '--setPref', 'hangmonitor.timeout=0', '--mozAfterPaint'], ^
(In reply to Joel Maher (:jmaher) from comment #0) > we are turning on additional tests as a staging run on m-c only. This will > run in parallel with the other tests. Once we observe these tests we will > be ready to transition to the new tests as needed. Can you explain why m-c only is wanted/needed/useful, as opposed to try or cedar instead?
we want to run these side by side for a while. m-c is a lower volume tree and we can gain a few runs/day to get enough data.
Comment on attachment 766654 [details] [diff] [review] new configs for tsvgx and tscrollx Review of attachment 766654 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I'm r+ing provisionally, if the file I'm about to attach and request feedback from you looks as you intended. ::: mozilla-tests/mobile_config.py @@ +163,5 @@ > + ('mochitest-gl', ( > + {'suite': 'mochitest-plain', > + 'testPath': 'content/canvas/test/webgl/test_webgl_conformance_test_suite.html', > + }, > + )), as discussed on IRC, please drop this hunk
Attachment #766654 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek) → review+
Attached patch dump-master diff (obsolete) — Splinter Review
This is a dump-master diff (clean vs patched) of attachment 766654 [details] [diff] [review], when it omits the mentioned hunk. I used a high -U value so that its easier to see what each line references
Attachment #768861 - Flags: feedback?(jmaher)
Attached patch intended diffSplinter Review
last attachment only listed one master, this is more like it. (its a list of steps, and jobs, as buildbot sees it)
Attachment #768861 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #768861 - Flags: feedback?(jmaher)
Comment on attachment 768861 [details] [diff] [review] dump-master diff Review of attachment 768861 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- lots of data here, but the job names and commands look as expected.
Attachment #768861 - Flags: review+
In production
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: