Closed
Bug 913174
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Represent Android x86 emulator test jobs with "S#" rather than "U"
Categories
(Tree Management Graveyard :: TBPL, defect)
Tree Management Graveyard
TBPL
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: armenzg, Assigned: RyanVM)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
4.13 KB,
patch
|
emorley
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
I think if I follow the steps on bug 820882 I should be able to get you a patch.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
I have no idea what I'm doing.
Attachment #800339 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Does this work the way you would expect when loading Ash in TBPL locally (by opening index.html in the browser)?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
FTR, I filed this bug because I had run a sendchange incorrectly and obviously tbpl would not show them.
I can see them now with the letter "U".
I don't know how to change the letter from U to something else.
I was thinking of naming them like S1, S2, S3, S4 & S5 and group them if possible.
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM UTC-4] from comment #3)
> Does this work the way you would expect when loading Ash in TBPL locally (by
> opening index.html in the browser)?
oooohh I didn't know.
It seems that I don't need the patch actually.
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Summary: I can't see Android x86 emulator test jobs → Represent Android x86 emulator test jobs with "S#" rather than "U"
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 800339 [details] [diff] [review]
androidx86.tbpl.diff
We'll ideally want the test jobs on the same row as the builds, whereas this patch will put them on another row (the existing /android x86/ regex catches these).
TBPL (presuming all works correctly!) will display unknown job types/platforms generically - eg "Other" for platform, and "M", "T", "U", or "?" for job types depending on which of the generic regexps catch it. As such, we should never need a TBPL patch to even be able to see the job - they're just for aesthetics :-)
What are these job types? Mochitest?
Attachment #800339 -
Flags: review?(emorley) → review-
Updated•11 years ago
|
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Sorry! I forgot to remove the review request after I determined in comment 4 that it was not needed.
We run 4 test suites per job so we do not necessary have to have all suites within to be of the same category.
We have 5 sets of tests [1]
- set1: m-1 to m-4
- set2: m-4 to m-8
- set3: r-1 to r3 + crashtest
- set4: m-gl, xpcshell & robocop{1,2}
- set5: jsreftest-[1-3]
These sets are probably going to change a bit since if all four run successfully they could generate to much output for us to handle (more than 50MB). Breaking them up is the easy way but we have other more time consuming options (We don't want to bump the maxLogSize due to its perf hit on the masters).
For now, I think the best naming would be "S#" (# being a decimal) but I'm open to other options if this is not wanted.
[1] http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/file/default/mozilla-tests/mobile_config.py#l671
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ed Morley [:edmorley UTC+1] from comment #5)
> What are these job types? Mochitest?
These are the unholy concatenation of multiple different jobs in one "result".
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
"S" is already in use for static analysis builds, so I would prefer to avoid duplicating it for something that's entirely unrelated.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Still not a huge fan, but it gets the job done. I'm all ears to any suggested changes. I also went ahead and added the conditional 4.2 to the x86 regex to accommodate the changes in bug 823900.
Attachment #801992 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #800339 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 801992 [details] [diff] [review]
Add support for Android x86 test sets
Yuck, really not a fan of grouping Android test suites together, but seeing as that's the path we're heading down :-/
Attachment #801992 -
Flags: review?(emorley) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
In production
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Webtools → Tree Management
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Tree Management → Tree Management Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•