Closed
Bug 938821
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Remove reflection from ContentProviderTest and extending classes
Categories
(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: Testing, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 30
People
(Reporter: mcomella, Assigned: nalexander)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [mentor=mcomella][lang=java])
Attachments
(10 files, 1 obsolete file)
961 bytes,
patch
|
mcomella
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
6.36 KB,
patch
|
mcomella
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
82.58 KB,
patch
|
mcomella
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
8.74 KB,
patch
|
mcomella
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
98.99 KB,
patch
|
mcomella
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
9.50 KB,
patch
|
mcomella
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
7.70 KB,
patch
|
mcomella
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
14.52 KB,
patch
|
mcomella
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
8.00 KB,
patch
|
mcomella
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
9.25 KB,
patch
|
mcomella
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Reflection is used in setUp in order to get instances of the extending classes - we should just pass those classes in directly.
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Component: General → Testing
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [mentor=mcomella][lang=java]
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
FRI, hopefully bug 949208 will address at least part of this.
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Can I take this bug?
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(michael.l.comella)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Of course! :)
Let me know if you need a better description of what to do.
Assignee: nobody → isurae
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(michael.l.comella)
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Hi Michael,
In testHomeListsProvider there is reference to org.mozilla.gecko.db.HomeListsProvider. However I can't HomeLIstsProvider class in the source.
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Isura Edirisinghe from comment #6)
> Hi Michael,
>
> In testHomeListsProvider there is reference to
> org.mozilla.gecko.db.HomeListsProvider. However I can't HomeLIstsProvider
> class in the source.
It has been renamed to HomeProvider.java now, and it's functionality has changed quite a bit since that test was written, which is why it's disabled until we get the chance to update it. If you want to take on updating that test, you could go for it, but otherwise I would say you don't need to worry about fixing it.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
Fixing testHomeListsProvider is bug 964464.
Isura, as Margaret mentioned, you don't need to worry about it (unless you want to!).
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8368310 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8368310 [details] [diff] [review]
938821.patch
Review of attachment 8368310 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
We want to remove all instances of reflection, not just the instantiation.
I find reflection is easiest to find by looking for which reflection classes are imported by searching for ".reflect." or similar (e.g. `java.lang.reflect.Method`) and replace their uses with compile-time equivalents. Additionally, search for the `ClassLoader` class, which does not need to be imported.
Don't forget to remove the imports!
::: mobile/android/base/tests/ContentProviderTest.java
@@ +174,2 @@
> String authorityField) throws Exception {
> mProviderContract = mClassLoader.loadClass("org.mozilla.gecko.db.BrowserContract");
We should remove any use of ClassLoaders.
@@ +174,4 @@
> String authorityField) throws Exception {
> mProviderContract = mClassLoader.loadClass("org.mozilla.gecko.db.BrowserContract");
> mProviderAuthority = (String) mProviderContract.getField(authorityField).get(null);
> + mProviderClass = providerClass;
We shouldn't need to store this class - we should be able to call it directly. It seems the only use is newInstance(), which means we can just call `new ProviderClass(...);` instead.
Attachment #8368310 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review-
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Okay it's clear now! I thought the bug was only referring to the TODO comment :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8372911 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
This is rather artificial, since the test is currently disabled it
merely needs to compile.
Attachment #8372912 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8372913 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8372914 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8372915 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8372916 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8372917 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8372918 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8372919 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8372920 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella)
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•11 years ago
|
||
Isura: I'd like to apoligise for taking an assigned bug; I was working in the area, moved on this, and didn't realize you were already looking into it.
mcomella: these transformations are essentially mechanical. They're broken into pieces for my sanity, if not yours. The proof is in the pudding, a green try build:
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=48c4ace2b5ab
Assignee: isurae → nalexander
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8372911 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•11 years ago
|
||
mcomella: you might find it easier to look at these commits (and the ones for Bug 969922) at:
https://github.com/ncalexan/gecko-dev/tree/bug-938821-remove-reflection
Reporter | ||
Comment 24•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8372912 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 2: Remove getContentUri and get*Column from testHomeListsProvider.
Review of attachment 8372912 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
r+ w/ comment.
::: mobile/android/base/tests/testHomeListsProvider.java
@@ +7,5 @@
>
> public class testHomeListsProvider extends ContentProviderTest {
> + private static class Contract {
> + public static final Uri CONTENT_URI = null;
> + public static final Uri CONTENT_FAKE_URI = null;
Add a comment explaining that these are not init because they were added in a refactor where the disabled test only needed to compile.
Attachment #8372912 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8372913 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8372914 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8372915 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8372916 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8372917 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8372918 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 25•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8372919 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 9: Remove reflection from ContentProviderTest.authority.
Review of attachment 8372919 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: mobile/android/base/tests/testHomeListsProvider.java
@@ +32,5 @@
> }
>
> @Override
> public void setUp() throws Exception {
> + // This test is disabled, so this just needs to compile.
Nice, though I still think we should add the comment in patch #2's review as well.
Attachment #8372919 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 26•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8372920 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 10: Remove reflection from ContentProviderTest.
Review of attachment 8372920 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
r+ w/ nits.
::: mobile/android/base/tests/ContentProviderTest.java
@@ +173,5 @@
>
> + /**
> + * Factory function that makes new ContentProvider instances.
> + * <p>
> + * We want a fresh provider each test, so this is invoked in
nit: "...so this should be invoked...". This comment's existence does not make it so. ;)
@@ +176,5 @@
> + * <p>
> + * We want a fresh provider each test, so this is invoked in
> + * <code>setUp</code> before each individual test.
> + */
> + protected static Callable<ContentProvider> sBrowserProviderCallable = new Callable<ContentProvider>() {
nit: Might just be splinter but indentation of javadoc. Tabs?
@@ +213,5 @@
> }
>
> @Override
> public void setUp() throws Exception {
> + throw new Exception("You should call setUp(authority, databaseName) instead");
nit: UnsupportedOperationException
::: mobile/android/base/tests/testBrowserProviderPerf.java
@@ +9,5 @@
>
> import org.mozilla.gecko.GeckoProfile;
> import org.mozilla.gecko.db.BrowserContract;
> import org.mozilla.gecko.db.BrowserDB;
> +import org.mozilla.gecko.db.BrowserProvider;
nit: I don't think this import is needed.
::: mobile/android/base/tests/testDistribution.java
@@ +1,5 @@
> package org.mozilla.gecko.tests;
>
> import org.mozilla.gecko.*;
> import org.mozilla.gecko.db.BrowserContract;
> +import org.mozilla.gecko.db.BrowserProvider;
nit: I don't think this import is needed.
Attachment #8372920 -
Flags: review?(michael.l.comella) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 27•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8368310 [details] [diff] [review]
938821.patch
Isura, I apologize for setting this up as a mentor bug. I didn't realize it was so arduous! :(
If you want to continue working on the test framework, bug 943706 is available and, more challengingly, bug 970624.
Attachment #8368310 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•11 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/be5b8d98c85d
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/387133d0df05
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/bd79dac304bb
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/1f920fcbc4d7
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/d8516ad95228
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/8b4375f03b3c
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/4a83ace2b971
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/611f026b232e
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/ee591d0ba0b6
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/7e57a8a526d7
Comment 29•11 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/be5b8d98c85d
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/387133d0df05
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/bd79dac304bb
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1f920fcbc4d7
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d8516ad95228
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8b4375f03b3c
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/4a83ace2b971
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/611f026b232e
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ee591d0ba0b6
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7e57a8a526d7
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 30
Updated•4 years ago
|
Product: Firefox for Android → Firefox for Android Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•