Closed
Bug 997576
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
[NFC] Testcase for reading empty NFC tag
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: NFC, defect)
Tracking
(tracking-b2g:backlog)
People
(Reporter: dimi, Assigned: dimi)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [p=2])
Attachments
(2 files, 4 obsolete files)
Write a test case for empty NFC tag because of bug 997094
Blocks: b2g-nfc
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [p=2]
Target Milestone: --- → 2.0 S1 (9may)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Target Milestone: 2.0 S1 (9may) → 2.0 S2 (23may)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Target Milestone: 2.0 S3 (6june) → 2.0 S6 (18july)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8450797 -
Flags: review?(tzimmermann)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8450797 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8450797 -
Flags: review?(tzimmermann)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8450816 -
Flags: review?(tzimmermann)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8450819 -
Flags: review?(tzimmermann)
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8450816 [details] [diff] [review]
NFC add tag clear command v1
Review of attachment 8450816 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This looks very good already. Thanks for the patch.
::: hw/nfc-tag.c
@@ +79,5 @@
> {
> ssize_t offset = 0;
> uint8_t* data;
>
> assert(tag);
Please use 'assert(ndef_msg || !len);'. This tests for either an NDEF message, or no message.
@@ +91,5 @@
>
> data[offset++] = NDEF_MESSAGE_TLV;
> data[offset++] = len;
>
> + if (len) {
I'm not sure, but I think you can just use '0' as length argument for memcpy.
@@ +92,5 @@
> data[offset++] = NDEF_MESSAGE_TLV;
> data[offset++] = len;
>
> + if (len) {
> + assert(ndef_msg);
Should be removed with comment above addressed.
@@ +103,5 @@
> memset(data + offset, 0, sizeof(tag->t.t1.format.data) - offset);
> }
>
> static void
> set_t2t_data(struct nfc_tag* tag, const uint8_t* ndef_msg, ssize_t len)
See my comments for |set_t1t_data|.
@@ +128,5 @@
> memset(data + offset, 0, sizeof(tag->t.t2.format.data) - offset);
> }
>
> static void
> set_t3t_data(struct nfc_tag* tag, const uint8_t* ndef_msg, ssize_t len)
See my comments for |set_t1t_data|.
@@ +158,4 @@
> }
>
> static void
> set_t4t_data(struct nfc_tag* tag, const uint8_t* ndef_msg, ssize_t len)
See my comments for |set_t1t_data|.
Attachment #8450816 -
Flags: review?(tzimmermann) → review+
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8450819 [details] [diff] [review]
Testcase v1
Review of attachment 8450819 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This looks good. Thank you.
::: dom/nfc/tests/marionette/test_nfc_read_tag.js
@@ +9,5 @@
> +// TODO : Get this from emulator console command.
> +const T1T_RE_INDEX = 2;
> +const T2T_RE_INDEX = 3;
> +const T3T_RE_INDEX = 4;
> +const T4T_RE_INDEX = 5;
Would it make sense to move these constants to head.js in another cleanup bug? There could also be P2P_RE_INDEX_*.
@@ +103,5 @@
> + testUrlT1TDiscover,
> + testUrlT2TDiscover,
> + testUrlT3TDiscover,
> + testUrlT4TDiscover
> +];
Would it make sense to first run the Url test and afterwards run the Empty tests? This way, the 'clear' operation would really *clear* an NDEF message from the tag, and not just set an empty message.
Attachment #8450819 -
Flags: review?(tzimmermann) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8450816 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8450866 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Thomas Zimmermann [:tzimmermann] [:tdz] from comment #7)
> Comment on attachment 8450819 [details] [diff] [review]
> Testcase v1
>
> Review of attachment 8450819 [details] [diff] [review]:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This looks good. Thank you.
>
> ::: dom/nfc/tests/marionette/test_nfc_read_tag.js
> @@ +9,5 @@
> > +// TODO : Get this from emulator console command.
> > +const T1T_RE_INDEX = 2;
> > +const T2T_RE_INDEX = 3;
> > +const T3T_RE_INDEX = 4;
> > +const T4T_RE_INDEX = 5;
>
> Would it make sense to move these constants to head.js in another cleanup
> bug? There could also be P2P_RE_INDEX_*.
>
I will create another cleanup bug for it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8452102 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8450819 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Address Thomas's comment
Attachment #8452102 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8452104 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
Flags: in-testsuite+
Keywords: checkin-needed
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•10 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: backlog → ---
tracking-b2g:
--- → backlog
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•