Closed Bug 997576 Opened 11 years ago Closed 10 years ago

[NFC] Testcase for reading empty NFC tag

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: NFC, defect)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(tracking-b2g:backlog)

RESOLVED FIXED
2.0 S6 (18july)
tracking-b2g backlog

People

(Reporter: dimi, Assigned: dimi)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [p=2])

Attachments

(2 files, 4 obsolete files)

Write a test case for empty NFC tag because of bug 997094
Please this into backlog.
blocking-b2g: --- → backlog
Whiteboard: [p=2]
Target Milestone: --- → 2.0 S1 (9may)
Target Milestone: 2.0 S1 (9may) → 2.0 S2 (23may)
defer to sprint3.
Target Milestone: 2.0 S2 (23may) → 2.0 S3 (6june)
Target Milestone: 2.0 S3 (6june) → 2.0 S6 (18july)
Attached patch Add tag clear command (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8450797 - Flags: review?(tzimmermann)
Attachment #8450797 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8450797 - Flags: review?(tzimmermann)
Attached patch NFC add tag clear command v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8450816 - Flags: review?(tzimmermann)
Attached patch Testcase v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8450819 - Flags: review?(tzimmermann)
Comment on attachment 8450816 [details] [diff] [review] NFC add tag clear command v1 Review of attachment 8450816 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- This looks very good already. Thanks for the patch. ::: hw/nfc-tag.c @@ +79,5 @@ > { > ssize_t offset = 0; > uint8_t* data; > > assert(tag); Please use 'assert(ndef_msg || !len);'. This tests for either an NDEF message, or no message. @@ +91,5 @@ > > data[offset++] = NDEF_MESSAGE_TLV; > data[offset++] = len; > > + if (len) { I'm not sure, but I think you can just use '0' as length argument for memcpy. @@ +92,5 @@ > data[offset++] = NDEF_MESSAGE_TLV; > data[offset++] = len; > > + if (len) { > + assert(ndef_msg); Should be removed with comment above addressed. @@ +103,5 @@ > memset(data + offset, 0, sizeof(tag->t.t1.format.data) - offset); > } > > static void > set_t2t_data(struct nfc_tag* tag, const uint8_t* ndef_msg, ssize_t len) See my comments for |set_t1t_data|. @@ +128,5 @@ > memset(data + offset, 0, sizeof(tag->t.t2.format.data) - offset); > } > > static void > set_t3t_data(struct nfc_tag* tag, const uint8_t* ndef_msg, ssize_t len) See my comments for |set_t1t_data|. @@ +158,4 @@ > } > > static void > set_t4t_data(struct nfc_tag* tag, const uint8_t* ndef_msg, ssize_t len) See my comments for |set_t1t_data|.
Attachment #8450816 - Flags: review?(tzimmermann) → review+
Comment on attachment 8450819 [details] [diff] [review] Testcase v1 Review of attachment 8450819 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- This looks good. Thank you. ::: dom/nfc/tests/marionette/test_nfc_read_tag.js @@ +9,5 @@ > +// TODO : Get this from emulator console command. > +const T1T_RE_INDEX = 2; > +const T2T_RE_INDEX = 3; > +const T3T_RE_INDEX = 4; > +const T4T_RE_INDEX = 5; Would it make sense to move these constants to head.js in another cleanup bug? There could also be P2P_RE_INDEX_*. @@ +103,5 @@ > + testUrlT1TDiscover, > + testUrlT2TDiscover, > + testUrlT3TDiscover, > + testUrlT4TDiscover > +]; Would it make sense to first run the Url test and afterwards run the Empty tests? This way, the 'clear' operation would really *clear* an NDEF message from the tag, and not just set an empty message.
Attachment #8450819 - Flags: review?(tzimmermann) → review+
Attachment #8450816 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8450866 - Flags: review+
(In reply to Thomas Zimmermann [:tzimmermann] [:tdz] from comment #7) > Comment on attachment 8450819 [details] [diff] [review] > Testcase v1 > > Review of attachment 8450819 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > This looks good. Thank you. > > ::: dom/nfc/tests/marionette/test_nfc_read_tag.js > @@ +9,5 @@ > > +// TODO : Get this from emulator console command. > > +const T1T_RE_INDEX = 2; > > +const T2T_RE_INDEX = 3; > > +const T3T_RE_INDEX = 4; > > +const T4T_RE_INDEX = 5; > > Would it make sense to move these constants to head.js in another cleanup > bug? There could also be P2P_RE_INDEX_*. > I will create another cleanup bug for it.
Attached patch Testcase v2 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8452102 - Flags: review+
Attachment #8450819 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch Testcase v3Splinter Review
Address Thomas's comment
Attachment #8452102 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8452104 - Flags: review+
Keywords: checkin-needed
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
blocking-b2g: backlog → ---
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: