99765 - Indent Twice the content will move a little bit on screen

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 61949

(Core :: DOM: Editor, defect, P3)

Description

[wkfx2003-bugzilla]

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4+)
Gecko/20010914
BuildID:    2001091403

.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. New Message
2. Type "a" in the body, leave the cursor after "A"
3. Press "Indent Text" button on format toolbar twice

Actual Results:  "A" moved down a little bit

Expected Results:  "A" remains in the same horizontal level

Comment 1

[Jean-Francois Ducarroz]

over to editor

Comment 2

[kinmoz]

This is a dup of bug 61271 that was marked INVALID.

dbaron, should the top margins of nested blockquotes at the very top of the
document be applied? I noticed that if you have one blockquote at the top of the
doc, the top-margin isn't applied. But if you nest one underneath it, you get
the top-margin, and if you nest more underneath that one, you still only get the
the top-margin that was applied after the 2nd blockquote.

Comment 3

[David Baron :dbaron: (⌚️UTC-4, no longer working on Mozilla)]

You don't see the margin after the first indent because of a rule in quirk.css
(look for selectors body > blockquote:first-child and td >
blockquote:first-child).  We could remove blockquote from that rule to solve the
problem.  Those rules are a not-quite-complete attempt to emulate 4.x's quirk of
not displaying outer margins on body and TD.  Nobody has yet thought of a better
way to emulate this quirk without causing significantly worse problems (i.e.,
ignoring author-specified rather than UA-specified margins).

The reason adding a third indent doesn't add anything is that all adjacent
vertical margins collapse.

Comment 4

[David Baron :dbaron: (⌚️UTC-4, no longer working on Mozilla)]

Well, an easy way.  We could start adding values to margin all over the place,
but that's hard...

Comment 5

[kinmoz]

--> 0.9.7

Comment 6

[dcary]

I'm pretty sure this is a dup of bug 61949.
(But how can that be, if this has already been assigned,
and that one is still NEW ?)

Comment 7

[Kathleen :Brade]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 61949 ***