Closed
Bug 1006957
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Handle buffer ownership correctly between SurfaceStream and CanvasClient.
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: Layers, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: sotaro, Assigned: sotaro)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 18 obsolete files)
80.43 KB,
patch
|
sotaro
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
920 bytes,
patch
|
sotaro
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
81.06 KB,
patch
|
sotaro
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #950079 +++
This bug is created based on Bug 950079 Comment 17.
Buffer ownership handling between SurfaceStream and CanvasClient has a problem. It could cause the problem to Fence delivery from Compositor to SurfaceStream.
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.0?
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: 2.0? → ---
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → sotaro.ikeda.g
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: --- → 1.4?
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
CanvasClientSurfaceStream does not explicitly handle buffer return to SurfaceStream. Post new buffer to Compositor side by the following call implicitly expect synchronous buffer return to the SurfaceStream. But the following call requests async transaction.
> GetForwarder()->UseTexture(this, mBuffer);
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
> > GetForwarder()->UseTexture(this, mBuffer);
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/gfx/layers/client/CanvasClient.cpp#182
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Bug 988956 might be necessary to fix the problem.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
I am going to use AsyncTransactionTracker::WaitComplete() to wait transaction complete.
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/gfx/layers/ipc/AsyncTransactionTracker.h
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Can we please get:
1) STRs
2) DUT
3) User impact of not taking fix
4) Regression or not from previous releases
Flags: needinfo?(sotaro.ikeda.g)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Preeti Raghunath(:Preeti) from comment #5)
> Can we please get:
>
> 1) STRs
Same to Bug 1006164.
> 2) DUT
What is DUT?
> 3) User impact of not taking fix.
Rarely saw black flicker during WebGL like WMW app.
> 4) Regression or not from previous releases
This is a regression caused by new b2g hardware specfic characteristic.
Flags: needinfo?(sotaro.ikeda.g)
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
Blocking for 1.4.
Can we please discuss low risk fix here and low risk landing?
blocking-b2g: 1.4? → 1.4+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Preeti Raghunath(:Preeti) from comment #7)
> Blocking for 1.4.
>
> Can we please discuss low risk fix here and low risk landing?
Bug 950079 is low risk solution for WMW. About this bug, I am thinking only one way of the fix. I think there are no other choice for low risk fix.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Confirmed the patch black flickering is fixed.
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8424186 -
Flags: feedback?(nical.bugzilla)
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8424186 [details] [diff] [review]
patch - Handle buffer ownership between SurfaceStream and CanvasClient.
Review of attachment 8424186 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I am struggling a bit with the logic around process ID, I suppose there is always one parent process so we don't really need to track its ID, so I suppose we are looking at the the child process ID here. But we create the LayerTransactionParent querying the current process ID, which makes it look like we are tracking the parent ID, so I am a bit confused. I think it would help a lot if you renamed all the [m|a]ProcessId and aOtherProcessID variables into [m|a][Child|Parent]ProcessId to make it clear which side's ID we are tracking.
I'll catch up with you on irc or skype today to get a better understanding of the overall thing.
::: gfx/layers/client/TextureClient.h
@@ +297,5 @@
> return mReleaseFenceHandle;
> }
>
> /**
> + * Set AsyncTransactionTracker of RemoveTextureFromCompositableAsync() transaction.
nit: trailing space
::: gfx/layers/ipc/CompositableTransactionParent.cpp
@@ +187,5 @@
> + GetProcessId(),
> + OpReplyRemoveTexture(true, // isMain
> + op.holderId(),
> + op.transactionId()));
> +
nit: trailing spaces
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Nicolas Silva [:nical] from comment #11)
> Comment on attachment 8424186 [details] [diff] [review]
> patch - Handle buffer ownership between SurfaceStream and CanvasClient.
>
> Review of attachment 8424186 [details] [diff] [review]:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I am struggling a bit with the logic around process ID, I suppose there is
> always one parent process so we don't really need to track its ID, so I
> suppose we are looking at the the child process ID here. But we create the
> LayerTransactionParent querying the current process ID, which makes it look
> like we are tracking the parent ID, so I am a bit confused. I think it would
> help a lot if you renamed all the [m|a]ProcessId and aOtherProcessID
> variables into [m|a][Child|Parent]ProcessId to make it clear which side's ID
> we are tracking.
It is tracking LayerTransactionchild's process id. I am going to update the code to make it clear.
>
> I'll catch up with you on irc or skype today to get a better understanding
> of the overall thing.
>
> ::: gfx/layers/client/TextureClient.h
> @@ +297,5 @@
> > return mReleaseFenceHandle;
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > + * Set AsyncTransactionTracker of RemoveTextureFromCompositableAsync() transaction.
>
> nit: trailing space
>
> ::: gfx/layers/ipc/CompositableTransactionParent.cpp
> @@ +187,5 @@
> > + GetProcessId(),
> > + OpReplyRemoveTexture(true, // isMain
> > + op.holderId(),
> > + op.transactionId()));
> > +
>
> nit: trailing spaces
Will update in a next patch.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Nicolas Silva [:nical] from comment #11)
> Comment on attachment 8424186 [details] [diff] [review]
> patch - Handle buffer ownership between SurfaceStream and CanvasClient.
>
> Review of attachment 8424186 [details] [diff] [review]:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I am struggling a bit with the logic around process ID, I suppose there is
> always one parent process so we don't really need to track its ID, so I
> suppose we are looking at the the child process ID here. But we create the
> LayerTransactionParent querying the current process ID, which makes it look
> like we are tracking the parent ID, so I am a bit confused. I think it would
> help a lot if you renamed all the [m|a]ProcessId and aOtherProcessID
> variables into [m|a][Child|Parent]ProcessId to make it clear which side's ID
> we are tracking.
The patch tracks child side's process id. When LayerTransactionParent(CompositableParentManager) receives an async transaction message, it sends back an async transaciton response message via ImageBridge parent. The messge is handled to ImageBridgeChild. ImageBridgeChild notify the transaction complete to AsyncTransactionTrackersHolder.
By this way, AsyncTransactionTracker provide a sync wait capability by using async transaction. By changing the sync wait place from gecko ipc transaction to AsyncTransactionTracker, we could put off sync wait.
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Apply the comments.
Attachment #8424186 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8424186 -
Flags: feedback?(nical.bugzilla)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8425469 -
Flags: feedback?(nical.bugzilla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
nical, can I get the feedback to the patch soon?
Flags: needinfo?(nical.bugzilla)
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8425469 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v2 - Handle buffer ownership between SurfaceStream and CanvasClient
Review of attachment 8425469 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for renaming the ProcessIds, I think it makes things clearer
Attachment #8425469 -
Flags: feedback?(nical.bugzilla) → feedback+
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
Thank for the quick feed back! I am going to update the patch for a review until tomorrow.
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(nical.bugzilla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
Some nits update.
Attachment #8425469 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•11 years ago
|
||
This bug fix seems to have a good effect to the performance.
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•11 years ago
|
||
Fix build failure in some platforms.
Attachment #8426727 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•11 years ago
|
||
Fix build failure.
Attachment #8426760 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8426766 -
Flags: review?(nical.bugzilla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•11 years ago
|
||
Fix windows build failure.
Attachment #8426766 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8426766 -
Flags: review?(nical.bugzilla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8426779 -
Flags: review?(nical.bugzilla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•11 years ago
|
||
Fix build failure on ICS.
Attachment #8426779 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8426779 -
Flags: review?(nical.bugzilla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8426897 -
Flags: review?(nical.bugzilla)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8426897 -
Flags: review?(nical.bugzilla) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•11 years ago
|
||
Revert ConnectImageBridgeInParentProcess()'s argument name. Carry "r=nical".
Attachment #8426897 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8427024 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 30•11 years ago
|
||
A patch for b2g v1.4. Carry "r=nical".
Attachment #8427041 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 31•11 years ago
|
||
On master, the problem is fixed. But on v1.4, the problem is exist on hw composer composition:-( On OpenGL composition case, the problem is fixed even in b2g v1.4.
On current master, hw composer is not used in almost all situations by some reasons. On b2g v1.4, Hw composer is used in WMW app. If we disable the hw composer, the problem is gone with the patch.
Assignee | ||
Comment 32•11 years ago
|
||
Release Fences are always sent on main thread, but RemoveTextureAsync transaction response is sent via ImageBridge. Therefore, release fence is arrived to child side after the transaction response's receival in child side.
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•11 years ago
|
||
Need to send related Fence object via ImageBridge too.
Assignee | ||
Comment 34•11 years ago
|
||
I locally fixed the black flash problem in Comment 31. But it change how to deliver Fence from compositor to child side. More code change becomes necessary. I am updating the patch.
Assignee | ||
Comment 35•11 years ago
|
||
Patch for b2g v1.4. Fix flickering problem on HWComposer composition.
Attachment #8427041 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 36•11 years ago
|
||
Sorry, this patch is correct patch for b2g v1.4.
Attachment #8427311 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 37•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8427024 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8427321 -
Attachment description: patch v9 for b2g v1.4 - Handle buffer ownership between SurfaceStream and CanvasClient → patch v10 for b2g v1.4 - Handle buffer ownership between SurfaceStream and CanvasClient
Assignee | ||
Comment 39•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 40•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8427506 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v10 - Handle buffer ownership between SurfaceStream and CanvasClient
Nical, can you review again? I changed how to deliver fence.
Attachment #8427506 -
Flags: review?(nical.bugzilla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 41•11 years ago
|
||
Fix build failure on other platforms.
Attachment #8427506 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8427506 -
Flags: review?(nical.bugzilla)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8427668 -
Flags: review?(nical.bugzilla)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8427668 -
Flags: review?(nical.bugzilla) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 42•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 43•11 years ago
|
||
Update the patch for b2g v1.4. Carry "r=nical".
Attachment #8427321 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8427739 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 44•11 years ago
|
||
Wait check-in until Bug 924622's check-in result becomes clear. This bug's patch conflicts with Bug 924622's patch.
Assignee | ||
Comment 46•11 years ago
|
||
![]() |
||
Comment 47•11 years ago
|
||
Backed out for crashes like https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=40320805&tree=Mozilla-Inbound
Comment 48•11 years ago
|
||
Backed out with https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/d29af2ac48cf
Lots of Android crashes, eg https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=40323080&tree=Mozilla-Inbound&full=1
Assignee | ||
Comment 49•11 years ago
|
||
By the Bug 924622 fix, shutdown sequence is changed, it seems to be affected to the crash.
Assignee | ||
Comment 50•11 years ago
|
||
Need to move layers::AsyncTransactionTrackersHolder::Finalize() call to more later than nsCycleCollector_shutdown() in mozilla::ShutdownXPCOM().
Assignee | ||
Comment 51•11 years ago
|
||
Change shutdown. Carry "r=nical".
Attachment #8427668 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8428256 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 52•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 53•11 years ago
|
||
Update the patch for b2g v1.4.
Attachment #8427739 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8428271 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 54•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 55•11 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla32
Comment 56•11 years ago
|
||
This is causing a B2G OS crash when I try to make a webrtc call using H.264 OMX. It works on the checkin before this landed (my patches for OMX H.264 cleanup landed a few hours after this, and had been tested before this landed). I reverified using the pre-checkin patches and this rev and the previous rev; previous rev works, this one crashes the phone.
You need this:
pref("media.peerconnection.video.h264_enabled", true);
or equivalent user pref to enable it.
We'll need to back this out or land a fix very soon.
Assignee | ||
Comment 57•11 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the notification. I am going to check it soon.
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8428271 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 58•11 years ago
|
||
I locally confirmed the fix. I am going to upload the patch soon.
Assignee | ||
Comment 59•11 years ago
|
||
WebRTC crash fix. Carry "r=nical".
Attachment #8428805 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 60•11 years ago
|
||
set REOPENED depend on Comment 56.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8428805 -
Attachment description: patch_1006957_fix → WebRTC crash fix
Assignee | ||
Comment 61•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 62•11 years ago
|
||
:jesup, can you confirm the fix by attachment 8428805 [details] [diff] [review]?
Flags: needinfo?(rjesup)
Assignee | ||
Comment 64•11 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the confirmation!
Assignee | ||
Comment 65•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8428859 -
Flags: review+
Comment 66•11 years ago
|
||
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 67•11 years ago
|
||
status-b2g-v1.4:
--- → fixed
status-b2g-v2.0:
--- → fixed
status-firefox30:
--- → wontfix
status-firefox31:
--- → wontfix
status-firefox32:
--- → fixed
Comment 68•11 years ago
|
||
Backed out for OSX asserts/crashes.
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g30_v1_4/rev/542755035aab
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=40550325&tree=Mozilla-B2g30-v1.4
Assignee | ||
Comment 69•11 years ago
|
||
Hmm, b2g v1.4 does not have Bug 924622 fix. It might affect to the crash.
Comment 70•11 years ago
|
||
FWIW, I'm trying to talk nical into writing backport patches for 30 and 31 :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 71•11 years ago
|
||
The crash happens because there is a cases that ImageBridgeParent is not destroyed until nsCycleCollector_shutdown(). I am going to add a workaround to prevent the crash for b2g-v1.4.
Assignee | ||
Comment 72•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM UTC-4] from comment #70)
> FWIW, I'm trying to talk nical into writing backport patches for 30 and 31 :)
Thanks!
Assignee | ||
Comment 73•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sotaro Ikeda [:sotaro] from comment #71)
> The crash happens because there is a cases that ImageBridgeParent is not
> destroyed until nsCycleCollector_shutdown(). I am going to add a workaround
> to prevent the crash for b2g-v1.4.
I am just going to add a pointer check to AsyncTransactionTrackersHolder::ClearAllAsyncTransactionTrackers().
Assignee | ||
Comment 74•11 years ago
|
||
Add pointer check to AsyncTransactionTrackersHolder::ClearAllAsyncTransactionTrackers().
Attachment #8428859 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 75•11 years ago
|
||
The following is the crash log that got from Comment 68. On gecko 30, ImageBridgeParent is destroyed by using Task. ImageBridge is not deleted within ShutdownXPCOM(). By Bug 924622, ImageBridgeParent becomes to be deleted within ShutdownXPCOM().
08:14:42 INFO - Crash dump filename: /var/folders/Qp/Qp6yrDnSFsmnaUw0Wilc2k+++-k/-Tmp-/tmpa_1xFr.mozrunner/minidumps/F152F458-763B-47A7-A999-3340310D2F72.dmp
08:14:42 INFO - Operating system: Mac OS X
08:14:42 INFO - 10.6.8 10K549
08:14:42 INFO - CPU: amd64
08:14:42 INFO - family 6 model 23 stepping 10
08:14:42 INFO - 2 CPUs
08:14:42 INFO - Crash reason: EXC_BAD_ACCESS / KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS
08:14:42 INFO - Crash address: 0x8
08:14:42 INFO - Thread 10 (crashed)
08:14:42 INFO - 0 XUL!mozilla::BlockingResourceBase::CheckAcquire(mozilla::CallStack const&) [BlockingResourceBase.cpp:6e420584d8bf : 94 + 0x0]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x0000000000000000 r12 = 0x000000011c97a198
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x000000011c97a180 r14 = 0x000000011e080a60
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011c0c6088 rip = 0x00000001019123f3
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e0809c0 rbp = 0x000000011e080a50
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: given as instruction pointer in context
08:14:42 INFO - 1 XUL!mozilla::OffTheBooksMutex::Lock() [BlockingResourceBase.cpp:6e420584d8bf : 224 + 0x7]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x0000000000000000 r12 = 0x000000011c97a198
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x000000011c97a180 r14 = 0x0000000000000000
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011c0c6088 rip = 0x00000001019129ae
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080a60 rbp = 0x000000011e080a70
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 2 XUL!mozilla::layers::AsyncTransactionTrackersHolder::ClearAllAsyncTransactionTrackers() [Mutex.h:6e420584d8bf : 173 + 0x7]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011c0c6088 r12 = 0x000000011c97a198
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x000000011c97a180 r14 = 0x0000000000000000
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011c0c6088 rip = 0x00000001022d6e27
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080a80 rbp = 0x000000011e080aa0
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 3 XUL!mozilla::layers::AsyncTransactionTrackersHolder::~AsyncTransactionTrackersHolder() [AsyncTransactionTracker.cpp:6e420584d8bf : 185 + 0x7]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011c0c6088 r12 = 0x000000011c97a198
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x000000011c97a180 r14 = 0x000000011c0c6050
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011c0c5d60 rip = 0x00000001022d6926
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080ab0 rbp = 0x000000011e080ac0
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 4 XUL!mozilla::layers::ImageBridgeParent::~ImageBridgeParent() [CompositableTransactionParent.h:6e420584d8bf : 29 + 0xb]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011c0c5d60 r12 = 0x000000011c97a198
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x000000011c97a180 r14 = 0x000000011c0c6050
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011c0c5d60 rip = 0x00000001022e84a4
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080ad0 rbp = 0x000000011e080b10
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 5 XUL!_ZThn752_N7mozilla6layers17ImageBridgeParentD0Ev [ImageBridgeParent.cpp:6e420584d8bf : 63 + 0x7]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011c0c5d60 r12 = 0x000000011c97a198
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x000000011c97a180 r14 = 0x00007fff5fbfe497
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x00007fff5fbfe498 rip = 0x00000001022e8368
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080b20 rbp = 0x000000011e080b30
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 6 XUL!mozilla::layers::DeleteImageBridgeSync [StaticPtr.h:6e420584d8bf : 158 + 0xb]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x0000000000009403 r12 = 0x000000011c97a198
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x000000011c97a180 r14 = 0x00007fff5fbfe497
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x00007fff5fbfe498 rip = 0x00000001022e5410
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080b40 rbp = 0x000000011e080b60
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 7 XUL!MessageLoop::DeferOrRunPendingTask(MessageLoop::PendingTask const&) [message_loop.cc:6e420584d8bf : 344 + 0x8]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011e080cf8 r12 = 0x000000011c97a198
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x000000011c97a180 r14 = 0x0000000158a00c10
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011e080bb0 rip = 0x0000000101ca3079
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080b70 rbp = 0x000000011e080ba0
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 8 XUL!MessageLoop::DoWork() [message_loop.cc:6e420584d8bf : 430 + 0xa]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011e080cf8 r12 = 0x000000011c97a198
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x000000011c97a180 r14 = 0x000000011e080bb8
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011e080bb0 rip = 0x0000000101ca338a
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080bb0 rbp = 0x000000011e080be0
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 9 XUL!base::MessagePumpDefault::Run(base::MessagePump::Delegate*) [message_pump_default.cc:6e420584d8bf : 34 + 0x8]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011e080c18 r12 = 0x000000011c97a198
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x000000011c97a180 r14 = 0x000000011e080cf8
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011e080c20 rip = 0x0000000101ca5e51
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080bf0 rbp = 0x000000011e080c70
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 10 XUL!MessageLoop::Run() [message_loop.cc:6e420584d8bf : 226 + 0x8]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011e080cf8 r12 = 0x000000011e080df8
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x0000000000009403 r14 = 0x000000011e080cf8
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011c07d5e8 rip = 0x0000000101ca29a6
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080c80 rbp = 0x000000011e080cc0
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 11 XUL!base::Thread::ThreadMain() [thread.cc:6e420584d8bf : 162 + 0x7]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011c07d5c0 r12 = 0x000000011e080df8
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x0000000000009403 r14 = 0x000000011e080cf8
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011c07d5e8 rip = 0x0000000101ca8ca0
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080cd0 rbp = 0x000000011e080f00
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 12 XUL!ThreadFunc [platform_thread_posix.cc:6e420584d8bf : 39 + 0x5]
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011e081000 r12 = 0x0000000000000000
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x0000000000009403 r14 = 0x0000000101c93150
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011c07d5c0 rip = 0x0000000101c9315a
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080f10 rbp = 0x000000011e080f10
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 13 libSystem.B.dylib + 0x39fd5
08:14:42 INFO - rbx = 0x000000011e081000 r12 = 0x0000000000000000
08:14:42 INFO - r13 = 0x0000000000009403 r14 = 0x0000000101c93150
08:14:42 INFO - r15 = 0x000000011c07d5c0 rip = 0x00007fff86a74fd6
08:14:42 INFO - rsp = 0x000000011e080f20 rbp = 0x000000011e080f50
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: call frame info
08:14:42 INFO - 14 libSystem.B.dylib + 0x39e88
08:14:42 INFO - rip = 0x00007fff86a74e89 rsp = 0x000000011e080f60
08:14:42 INFO - rbp = 0x000000011e080f78
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: stack scanning
08:14:42 INFO - 15 XUL + 0x39314f
08:14:42 INFO - rip = 0x0000000101c93150 rsp = 0x000000011e081050
08:14:42 INFO - Found by: stack scanning
Assignee | ||
Comment 76•11 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 77•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sotaro Ikeda [:sotaro] from comment #76)
> https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=dadffb68157d
tryserver result is not good. Need to add more pointer check.
Assignee | ||
Comment 78•11 years ago
|
||
Add more pointer checks.
Attachment #8430199 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8430338 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 79•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 80•11 years ago
|
||
FYI, you can safely ignore the mochitest-e10s and Android debug results (they were never intended to run on Gecko 30 anyway). As a general rule of thumb, you can safely ignore any test results for things you don't see running on a normal b2g30 run on TBPL.
Assignee | ||
Comment 81•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM UTC-4] from comment #80)
> FYI, you can safely ignore the mochitest-e10s and Android debug results
> (they were never intended to run on Gecko 30 anyway). As a general rule of
> thumb, you can safely ignore any test results for things you don't see
> running on a normal b2g30 run on TBPL.
Thanks. From it, attachment 8430338 [details] [diff] [review] seems good enough to check-in without bug 924622.
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 82•11 years ago
|
||
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 83•11 years ago
|
||
Bug 1006164 is now resolved for us. Thanks Sotaro.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•