Closed
Bug 107155
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
topozone.com - TOPOZONE doesn't display maps
Categories
(Tech Evangelism Graveyard :: English US, defect, P1)
Tech Evangelism Graveyard
English US
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Feb
People
(Reporter: gschueler, Assigned: bc)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [bae:20011126][DOCTYPE][TOOL][DYNAPI][aok])
Attachments
(1 file)
|
20.13 KB,
text/html
|
Details |
all parts of the map are loaded onto the same spot blow the designated area.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.5+) Gecko/20011009
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Confirmed on linux. Not a blocker.
Severity: blocker → normal
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows NT → All
Hardware: PC → All
*** Bug 110295 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Assignee | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [bae:20011126]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 111867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Any progress on this one? I notice from a comment from Bug#:111867 that there
appear to be issues with TopoZone's js & html. Has TopoZone been contacted?
--Doug
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
roberts, no not yet, sorry, but have been really swamped. I will send them a
note tonight.
you can tell when a site has been contacted when the Status changes to Assigned
and the target milestone is set for follow up testing.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
Error: is is not defined
Source File: http://www.topozone.com/script/dynapi/src/dynapi.js
Line: 221
Error: setting a property that has only a getter
Source File: http://www.topozone.com/map.asp
Line: 98
map displays fine in NS62 but is incorrectly displayed in Mozilla. Obvious
Server Side sniffing issues.
Contact info info@topozone.com. Sent message and will followup in Jan.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Whiteboard: [bae:20011126] → [bae:20011126][USERAGENT]
Target Milestone: --- → Jan
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
I took the liberty of contacting them with the previous comments on this bug.
They stated that eventhough it did not fully pass the test it should not be
broken in a typical browser. However, the developer had me test out an alternate
link where he had made some modifications. These worked great. He mentioned he
was going to test with other browsers and if all is good update the pages. He
was quite helpful but did maintain it was not a problem in other browsers.
K
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
ok, i looked again and did a diff on the source from mozilla and the source from
ns6.2. The only difference was in an object tag which I would not think would
cause the difference in the layout, so I was wrong when I attributed the problem
to server side sniffing:
<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"
codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=4,0,2,0"
width="468" height="60">
<param name="movie" value="/TopoNet/banner.swf">
<param name="quality" value="best">
<param name="play" value="true">
<embed src="banner.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="468"
height="60"
pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"
quality="best" play="true">
</object>
So, the next candidate is the dynapi script or the other script
http://www.topozone.com/script/maptools.js. I can not find anything in
particular that stands out in maptools.js.
Kevin, since you have a contact with the developer can you ask him what version
of dynapi he is using? It is not in the source file.
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
I've made the request and will post the response as soon as I get it.
K
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
Go, team: way to hustle! Can't wait til I can't see my TopoZone maps in Mozilla.
--Doug
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
Oops: One too many brown ales. Meant to say: "Can't wait til I _can_ see my
Topozone maps in Mozilla".
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
Got that object tag fixed yet?
--Doug
| Assignee | ||
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
Ah, I am full of crap. This site works in NS 6.2 and Mozilla 0.9.4 but not in
0.9.5 or later.
DOCTYPE <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Strict//EN">
http://www.bath.ac.uk/%7Epy8ieh/cgi/compat-test.pl?DOCTYPE=%3C%21DOCTYPE+HTML+PUBLIC+%22-%2F%2FW3C%2F%2FDTD+HTML+4.0+Strict%2F%2FEN%22%3E&MODE=full
=> STRICT Mode.
Kevin, Can you contact your developer and ask if he can remove the DOCTYPE? That
will invoke quirks mode in NS6.2 and in recent post 0.9.4 Mozilla builds.
I am attaching the source with a base href and the DOCTYPE removed. This
displays correctly in recent Mozilla builds.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
updating whiteboard=> DOCTYPE
Whiteboard: [bae:20011126][USERAGENT] → [bae:20011126][DOCTYPE]
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
I never got a response to the question about the dynapi version from TOPOZONE.
I'll ask again along with the question about the DOCTYPE.
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
I've not heard back from Ed McNierney <ed@topozone.com> on my last two requests.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
I sent another note to the info address and ed explaining my mistaken earlier
analysis and explaining the DOCTYPE issue.
Comment 20•24 years ago
|
||
Just in from Ed at Topozone:
I'm using the current (2.5.6) release. I got an email this morning from
Robert Clary at Netscape telling me that if I remove the DOCTYPE
statement from my HTML, my page should display just fine.
[edit]
So I guess I just need to include it and remove it on the
same page and everything will be fine <g>....
Comment 21•24 years ago
|
||
Did Ed at Topozone give an indication on when he might get around to this?
--Doug
Comment 22•24 years ago
|
||
He said he wouldn't have time to work on this till next week.
Comment 23•24 years ago
|
||
I've been in communication with Ed @ Topozone (ed@topozone.com).
It seems he's been getting some conflicting advice regarding this issue:
"I've got one group of Mozilla
developers telling me that all the pages on my site MUST pass the W3C
HTML validator (which *requires* the DOCTYPE tag) and another telling me
I must *remove* the DOCTYPE tag. I can assure you I will do at least
one of those things...."
Maybe this should get sorted out?
--Doug
| Assignee | ||
Comment 24•24 years ago
|
||
I sent a message to him detailing that he is invoking standards mode with his
DOCTYPE. I recommended that he either remove the DOCTYPE or remove the URI. I
gave him references to the mozilla.org DOCTYPE/quirks article.
He has not replied to me.
Comment 25•24 years ago
|
||
Ok: There's apparently been some confusion wrt Ed @ Topozone. He seems to
think somebody on the Mozilla team is going to give hime a specific
recommendation on how to handle the DOCTYPE issue. Before this is addressed
with him again, though, I have a request: could somebody please explain to me
why NS6.2 (based on Mozilla 9.4.1) can render the TopoZone mapes correctly, and
newer versions of Mozilla cannot? Are the newer Mozillas more
standards-complient, or is there a bug in the current Mozilla? If it is a
standards issue, and TopoZone is producing non-complient html, could someone
plese explain to me (and to Ed) _exactly_ what the fix for his site should be?
Thanks,
--Doug
| Assignee | ||
Comment 26•24 years ago
|
||
The issue is that a bug was fixed in Mozilla after Netscape 6.2 was released
that changed whether an HTML 4.01 Transitional DOCTYPE with URI invoked Quirks
or Standards mode or not. See bug 42525 and bug 55264 for the gory details.
There are several approaches Ed can take. Remove the DOCTYPE altogether to
invoke Quirks mode, Remove the URI from the DOCTYPE to invoke Quirks mode,
change the layout of his page so that it lays out as he intended for downlevel
browsers that do not support Standards mode as well as for modern browsers that
do. It is up to him to make a choice depending on factors such as difficulty,
cost, etc. He can contact me directly if he wants to discuss this. Handling this
issue via an intermediary in bugzilla is just not efficient.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 27•24 years ago
|
||
not fixed as of today. :-(
Blocks: 54458
Whiteboard: [bae:20011126][DOCTYPE] → [bae:20011126][DOCTYPE][TOOL][DYNAPI]
Comment 28•24 years ago
|
||
I spoke with Ed @ topozone last week. It doesn't sound like it will be fixed
any time soon. Topozone has a browser compatibilty upgrade planned some time in
the next couple of months, but they have to do compatibility testing on IE,
Opera, whatever the most popular Mac browser is, and a few other broswers
besides Mozilla which I hadn't even heard of before thay can implement the
DOCTYPE change.
--Doug
| Assignee | ||
Comment 29•24 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the feedback Doug. Will follow up in Feb. If you hear anything else,
please comment the bug. For now you can use NS6.2.1 !
Target Milestone: Jan → Feb
Comment 30•24 years ago
|
||
You're welcome, Bob. Looks like Netscape 6.2 it is (until the next branch :-{).
--Doug
| Assignee | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [bae:20011126][DOCTYPE][TOOL][DYNAPI] → [bae:20011126][DOCTYPE][TOOL][DYNAPI][aok]
Comment 31•24 years ago
|
||
Ed (Ed@topoZone) made a change: Topozone's maps now display properly in Mozilla
0.9.7!
--Doug
| Assignee | ||
Comment 32•24 years ago
|
||
yay! and they are using dynapi 2!
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 34•23 years ago
|
||
modified URL since this happened with other maps.
Summary: TOPOZONE doesn't display maps → topozone.com - TOPOZONE doesn't display maps
Comment 35•23 years ago
|
||
I believe this one should be closed out. A couple of months ago TopoZone
upgraded their system, and maps have been rendering fine with Mozilla since.
--Doug
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Tech Evangelism → Tech Evangelism Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•