1083124 - [Call Log] Call log is not updated when user delete contact

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 976990

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Dialer, defect)

Description

[promise09th]

1. Title : Call log is not updated when user delete contact
2. Precondition : Call logs exist
3. Tester's Action : 
 1) Enter call log
 2) Long-press 2nd call log list (when you use 1st call log list, issue is not reproduced)
 3) Select add contact
 4) Save contact
 5) Home
 6) Enter contact
 7) Delete contact
 8) Back to Home and enter call log
4. Detailed Symptom : Call log is not updated
5. Expected : Call log is updated normally
6. Reproducibility: Y
1) Frequency Rate : 80%
7. Mozilla Flame : Reproduce (v2.0)
8. Gaia revision : 9725d188

Comment 1

[promise09th]

Attachment: Bug_1083124.3gp

Comment 2

[Gabriele Svelto [:gsvelto]]

Confirmed on master using the STR from comment 0.

Comment 3

[Johan Lorenzo [:jlorenzo] - On PTO - Back on March 18th]

Per comment 0 and 2.

Comment 4

[Johan Lorenzo [:jlorenzo] - On PTO - Back on March 18th]

Gabriele, could this be related to bug 1081463?

Comment 5

[Rachelle Yang [:ryang][[e-mail]]]

Hi Anthony, not sure of Gabriele is occupied...

Could you please kindly help look into or find someone on this issue?

This issue is reproducible on 2.1 and master as well. It's a generic bug.

Thank you very much !!

Comment 6

[Anthony Ricaud (:rik)]

I'll let Gabriele take care of this.

Comment 7

[Gabriele Svelto [:gsvelto]]

(In reply to Johan Lorenzo [:jlorenzo] (QA) from comment #4)
> Gabriele, could this be related to bug 1081463?

I'm not sure. I've still got a couple of major issues on my plate but I'll try to have a look. Worst case we'll triage and assign this on Thursday.

To the reporter, if this is important remember to flag it as 2.0? so that it will be triaged appropriately.

Comment 8

[promise09th]

Dear Gabriele Svelto

Our QE team find this issue. So, I think this is important issue and should fix it

Thank you

Comment 9

[Rachelle Yang [:ryang][[e-mail]]]

[Blocking Requested - why for this release]:

Set it to 2.0? For triage.

Comment 10

[Doug Sherk (:drs) (inactive)]

(In reply to Johan Lorenzo [:jlorenzo] (QA) from comment #4)
> Gabriele, could this be related to bug 1081463?

No, I strongly believe that these are completely unrelated. Though I don't have any evidence yet.

I also don't think this is a regression, though I'm less sure about that. I don't think we ever handled this correctly.

qawanted for checks on v1.4.

Comment 11

[Pi Wei Cheng [:piwei] (inactive)]

(In reply to Doug Sherk (:drs) (use needinfo?) from comment #10)
> qawanted for checks on v1.4.

Issue is reproducible on Flame v165 base image (v1.4).

Following STR at comment 0, the deleted contact still displays a name in call log. But if I kill the Dialer/Phone app via card view and relaunch then call log is correctly updated to show only the phone number. This behavior is the same as on v188 base image (v2.0).

Comment 12

[Doug Sherk (:drs) (inactive)]

(In reply to Pi Wei Cheng [:piwei] from comment #11)
> (In reply to Doug Sherk (:drs) (use needinfo?) from comment #10)
> > qawanted for checks on v1.4.
> 
> Issue is reproducible on Flame v165 base image (v1.4).
> 
> Following STR at comment 0, the deleted contact still displays a name in
> call log. But if I kill the Dialer/Phone app via card view and relaunch then
> call log is correctly updated to show only the phone number. This behavior
> is the same as on v188 base image (v2.0).

Thanks. In this case, I'm pretty confident in saying that this isn't a regression. I think we just never handled this correctly.

Comment 13

[Rachelle Yang [:ryang][[e-mail]]]

[Blocking Requested - why for this release]:
Per comment 12, this bug happened from 1.4, and still exits on 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2.
nominate the bug to 2.1? 
Thank you very much!!

Comment 14

[Johan Lorenzo [:jlorenzo] - On PTO - Back on March 18th]

Triage: It doesn't really make sense to block 2.1 if 2.0 still have this issue (and if we shipped 1.4 with it). This is a bad bug that need to be fixed in the next releases.

Comment 15

[Anthony Ricaud (:rik)]

Sounds like bug 976990.

Comment 16

[bhavana bajaj [:bajaj]]

(In reply to Anthony Ricaud (:rik) from comment #15)
> Sounds like bug 976990.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 976990 ***

Agree we do not need to block here, but this should be prioritize to fix. I'll track the other bug so the dialer team and fix it in 2.2